scholarly journals Anatomy of a Successful Practice-Changing Study: A Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Trials Network-National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Collaboration

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 858-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Philip L. McCarthy ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson ◽  
Shelly L. Carter ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (16) ◽  
pp. 3675-3684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Bosi ◽  
Daniele Laszlo ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Josy Reffeirs ◽  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Leukemic relapse is the most frequent cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). To identify prognostic factors affecting the outcome of second HSCT, we performed a retrospective study on patients with acute leukemia (AL) undergoing second HSCT who reported to the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy patients who received second HSCTs for AL experienced relapse after first HSCTs were performed from 1978 to 1997. Status at second HSCT, time between first and second HSCT, conditioning regimen, source of stem cells, treatment-related mortality (TRM), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse were considered. RESULTS: Engraftment occurred in 97% of patients. Forty-two patients were alive at last follow-up, with a 5-year OS rate of 26%. The 5-year probability for TRM, LFS, and relapse was 46%, 25%, and 59%, respectively. Grade ≥ 2 aGVHD occurred in 59% of patients, and chronic GVHD occurred in 32%. In multivariate analysis, diagnosis, interval to relapse after first HSCT > 292 days, aGVHD at first HSCT, complete remission status at second HSCT, use of total-body irradiation at second HSCT, acute GVHD at second HSCT, and use of bone marrow as source of stem cells at second HSCT were associated with better outcome. CONCLUSION: Second HSCT represents an effective therapeutic option for AL patients relapsed after allogeneic HSCT, with a 3-year LFS rate of 52% for the subset of patients who experienced relapse more than 292 days after receiving the first HSCT and who were in remission before receiving the second HSCT.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3394-3394
Author(s):  
John A Snowden ◽  
Robert Danby ◽  
Annalisa Ruggeri ◽  
David I Marks ◽  
Rachael E Hough ◽  
...  

Abstract In the UK, unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been used increasingly in adults since 2000. National guidelines were published in 2009 (Shaw et al, 2009) and two national prospective clinical trials have been established (EUDRACT registrations; RIC 2004-003845-41 and MAC 2009-011818-21). However, national trends and outcomes have never been comprehensively appraised. We have therefore analysed the demographic data and outcomes in adults (>18 years) undergoing UCBT in 23 UK transplant centres from 2000-2012 using the BSBMT and Eurocord databases. From the first adult UCBT in 2000 to the end of 2102 there were a total of 176 centre UCBT registrations with corresponding cord blood bank data, including 28 patients in the national prospective clinical trials which have been excluded from any further analysis. Outcomes were analysed for 148 patients with a median age of 40.8 (range 18-72) years, with acute leukaemia (n=80), myeloproliferative disorders/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (n=43), lymphoproliferative diseases (n=20) or bone marrow failure (n=5). Half the activity was between 2000-2008 and half between 2009-2012, reflecting a greater than doubling of activity in recent years. Various conditioning regimens were used, with the majority receiving a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Most patients (72%) received double cord blood units (dCBU) and the remainder a single CBU. Recorded median total cell dose infused was 3.61 x107/kg (range 0.41-34.35) for total nucleated cell count (TNC) and 1.69 x105/kg (range 0.13-14.97) for CD34+ cells. Engraftment of neutrophils to >0.5 x109/L occurred at a median of 22 (range 3-52) days and platelets to >20 x109/L at a median of 39 (range 10-117) days. Overall survival at 1 year was 46.4% (CI 38.8-55.5%) and 2 years was 40% (CI 32-49%), with an overall median survival of 27.1 (range 3.2-83.7) months. The incidence of grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 17.6% (CI 11.5-24.8%) and chronic GVHD at 1 year was 11.4% (CI 6.7-17.6%). In patients treated for malignant disease with remission status available (n=137), cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.0% (CI 6.4-16.9%) at 100 days and 24.6% (CI 17.5-32.4%) at 1 year, and treatment related mortality was 22.6% (CI 16.0-30.0%) at 100 days and 34.6% (CI 26.5-42.7%) at 1 year. In univariate analysis, overall survival (OS) at 2 years was strongly related to stage of disease; 54% for early (CR1, chronic phase, MDS subtype-RA, good remission) versus 47% for intermediate (CR2, accelerated phase, MDS transformation, PR) versus 21% for advanced (non-remission, other subtypes of MDS) (p=0.0001). There was no impact of gender, age, diagnosis, intensity of conditioning regimen, use of serotherapy in the conditioning regimen, CBU number, TNC or CD34+ dose, HLA or ABO matching, or year of UCBT (2000-08 versus 2009-12) on OS. In a subgroup analysis of acute leukaemia, the relationship between 2 year OS and disease status was stronger; 60% for early versus 43% for intermediate versus 0% for advanced (p=0.000008), with improved survival outcomes with the use of dCBU over single unit UCBT (50% vs 34%), although this did not achieve significance (p=0.15). This retrospective national analysis supports the evolution of UCBT as an effective treatment in adults without an otherwise available donor. Outcomes are comparable to similar patient groups treated with unrelated blood and marrow transplantation. The best outcomes are achieved in early and intermediate risk disease. The benefit of national guidelines is supported by more than doubling of activity since publication in 2009 without deterioration in outcomes. Whether the national prospective clinical trials will deliver improved UK outcomes will be determined following initial analysis in 2014. Reference Shaw BE, et al. Recommendations for a standard UK approach to incorporating umbilical cord blood into clinical transplantation practice: conditioning protocols and donor selection algorithms. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2009;44:7-12 Disclosures: Gluckman: Cord use: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria.


ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e000860
Author(s):  
Christoph E Heilig ◽  
Manuela Badoglio ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Stefan Fröhling ◽  
Simona Secondino ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe role of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) remains an unsettled issue. Prospective clinical trials failed to prove a benefit of the procedure but were limited by small and heterogeneous patient cohorts. Thus, it is unknown if ASCT may be a valuable treatment option in specific patient subgroups.MethodsThe purpose of this study was to investigate the value of ASCT according to histological subtype in STS patients who were registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database between 1996 and 2016.ResultsMedian progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort of 338 patients were 8.3 and 19.8 months, respectively, and PFS and OS at 5 years were 13% and 25%, respectively. Analysis of outcomes in different subgroups showed that younger age, better remission status before transplantation and melphalan-based preparative regimen were predictive of benefit from ASCT, whereas histology and grading had no statistically significant impact.ConclusionsOutcomes after ASCT compared favorably to those of recent trials on conventional chemotherapies and targeted therapies in STS, including histology-tailored approaches. ASCT, thus, should be reinvestigated in clinical trials focusing on defined patient subgroups.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica N. Peters ◽  
Essie Torres ◽  
Graham W. Warren ◽  
K. M. Cummings ◽  
Ellen R. Gritz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stephen S. Grubbs

Overview: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cooperative Group Program has been reviewed by three published studies in the last 7 years evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of this national oncology clinical trials system. The recommendations for improvement from these reports have prompted NCI to transform the Cooperative Group Program into a new NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) to improve the efficiency of large clinical trials and increase the speed of cancer translational research. The new NCTN offers community-based clinical investigators new opportunities to advance cancer research in their community setting but also presents challenges in promoting community-based research.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2736-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Smith ◽  
R S Ungerleider ◽  
E L Korn ◽  
L Rubinstein ◽  
R Simon

PURPOSE To describe the rationale for independent data monitoring committees (DMCs) for National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored phase III cooperative group clinical trials. DESIGN We review the necessity for interim monitoring of outcome data during the course of randomized clinical trials and summarize the reasons for establishing DMCs with requisite expertise and with appropriate independence from study investigators. RESULTS The important components of the policy for cooperative group DMCs are described with a focus on the makeup of these bodies and on the complementary roles of study committee leadership and DMCs in protecting patient safety during the conduct of randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSION The cooperative group DMCs that are independent of the study committees and that have the requisite expertise to examine accumulating data and to base decisions on monitoring guidelines that are specified in advance by the study committee provide a body able to protect patient safety, to protect the integrity of the clinical experiments on which patients have consented to participate, and to assure the public that conflicts of interest do not compromise either patient safety or trial integrity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document