Targeted Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Impacts Reward Expectancy-Related Reward Circuitry Activity and Affect in Bipolar Disorder and Healthy Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. S38
Author(s):  
Mary Phillips ◽  
Michele Bertocci ◽  
Henry Chase ◽  
Simona Graur ◽  
Richelle Stiffler ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. S92
Author(s):  
Mary Phillips ◽  
Michele Bertocci ◽  
Henry Chase ◽  
Fabio Ferrarelli ◽  
Richelle Stiffler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Francesca Criscuolo ◽  
Filippo Cantu ◽  
Irene Taurino ◽  
Sandro Carrara ◽  
Giovanni De Micheli

Author(s):  
Andre Russowsky Brunoni ◽  
Bernardo de Sampaio Pereira Júnior ◽  
Izio Klein

Bipolar disorder is a prevalent condition, with few therapeutic options and a high degree of refractoriness. This justifies the development of novel non-pharmacological treatment strategies, such as the non-invasive techniques of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), as well as the invasive techniques of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). In this chapter, we provide a summary of the development of the techniques as well as the studies carried out with patients with bipolar disorder. Although many promising results regarding the efficacy of theses techniques were described, the total number of studies is still low, highlighting the need of further studies in larger samples as to provide a definite picture regarding the use of clinical neuromodulation in bipolar disorder.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Favilla ◽  
Ashwin B. Parthasarathy ◽  
John A. Detre ◽  
Arjun G. Yodh ◽  
Michael T. Mullen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Ann Leow ◽  
James R. Tresilian ◽  
Aya Uchida ◽  
Dirk Koester ◽  
Tamara Spingler ◽  
...  

AbstractSensorimotor adaptation is an important part of our ability to perform novel motor tasks (i.e., learning of motor skills). Efforts to improve adaptation in healthy and clinical patients using non-invasive brain stimulation methods have been hindered by interindividual and intra-individual variability in brain susceptibility to stimulation. Here, we explore unpredictable loud acoustic stimulation as an alternative method of modulating brain excitability to improve sensorimotor adaptation. In two experiments, participants moved a cursor towards targets, and adapted to a 30° rotation of cursor feedback, either with or without unpredictable acoustic stimulation. Acoustic stimulation improved initial adaptation to sensory prediction errors in Study 1, and improved overnight retention of adaptation in Study 2. Unpredictable loud acoustic stimulation might thus be a potent method of modulating sensorimotor adaptation in healthy adults.


EP Europace ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i144-i145
Author(s):  
A Gauthey ◽  
C De Meester ◽  
S Marchandise ◽  
C Scavee ◽  
J B Le Polain De Waroux

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3034-3034
Author(s):  
Francesco Gatto ◽  
Sinisa Bratulic ◽  
Ilaria Teresa Rita Cavarretta ◽  
Massimo Alfano ◽  
Francesca Maccari ◽  
...  

3034 Background: Non-invasive liquid biopsies promise to enable early cancer detection and improve patient outcomes. However, virtually all liquid biopsies rely on genomic biomarkers, with limited sensitivity to early-stage tumors and poor detection of cancers shedding little cell-free DNA, like genitourinary or brain tumors. Here, we explored the use of plasma and urine glycosaminoglycan (GAGs) profiles, or GAGomes, as biomarkers reflective of tumor metabolism to serve as an alternative pan-cancer liquid biopsy. Methods: In this case-control study, we enrolled retrospective and prospective cohorts from Sweden and Italy. Included cases were treatment-naïve early-stage/low-grade cancers or metastatic/high-grade cancers across 14 histological types. Included controls were healthy 22-78 y/o adults with no history of cancer. We measured GAGomes – encompassing 17 chondroitin sulfate (CS), heparan sulfate (HS), and hyaluronate (HA) disaccharides - using a standardized UHPLC-MS/MS-based kit in a central blind laboratory. We tested the top GAGome features different in cancer using Bayesian estimation. These were used to design one plasma and one urine GAG score for the binary classification of cancer vs. control in a discovery set. We computed the area-under-the-curve (AUC), and sensitivity at 98% specificity of each GAG score in the validation set. A subset analysis was performed in early-stage/low-grade cancers only. In the subset of cases with survival records, we used multivariable Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) on each GAG score adjusted for cancer type, age, and gender. Results: GAGomes were measured in 753 plasma samples (460 cancers across 14 types, median age = 66 y/o, 51% female vs. 293 healthy adults, median age = 58 y/o, 57% female) and 559 urine samples (219 cancers across 5 types, median age = 69 y/o, 23% female vs. 340 healthy adults, median age = 56 y/o, 60% female). In the discovery set, the urine GAG score had an AUC = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85, 124 cancers across 5 types vs. 184 controls) while the plasma GAG score had an AUC = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86, 153 cancers across 14 types vs. 282 controls). In the validation set, the urine GAG score had an AUC = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84, 95 cancers across 5 types vs. 156 controls) with 35% sensitivity at 98% specificity. The plasma GAG score had an AUC = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.88, 178 cancers across 14 types vs. 140 controls) with 41% sensitivity at 98% specificity. In the subset of early-stage/low-grade cancers, the AUC was 0.78 and 0.72 in plasma and urine, respectively. The plasma and urine GAG scores were independent predictors of OS regardless of cancer type (HR = 1.39, p = 0.005 in plasma [ N = 283, 11 types, 67 deaths, median follow-up 17 months] and HR = 1.53, p = 0.016 in urine [ N = 161, 4 types, 32 deaths, median follow-up 15 months]). Conclusions: GAGomes were sensitive non-invasive metabolic biomarkers for any-stage cancer, including genitourinary and brain tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document