scholarly journals Construct and discriminant validity of STarT Back Screening Tool – Brazilian version

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Pilz ◽  
Rodrigo A. Vasconcelos ◽  
Paulo P. Teixeira ◽  
Wilson Mello ◽  
Freddy B. Marcondes ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Pilz ◽  
Rodrigo A. Vasconcelos ◽  
Freddy B. Marcondes ◽  
Samuel S. Lodovichi ◽  
Wilson Mello ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Evdokia Billis ◽  
Fousekis Konstantinos ◽  
Tsekoura Maria ◽  
Lampropoulou Sofia ◽  
Matzaroglou Charalampos ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Sanz Simon ◽  
Renata Thomas Ávila ◽  
Gilson Vieira ◽  
Cássio Machado de Campos Bottino

ABSTRACT Metamemory measures provide subjective memory information and are relevant to investigate memory ability in aging. However, there is a lack of metamemory instruments available in Brazil. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ), which evaluates different dimensions of subjective memory functioning, such as Feelings, Abilities and Strategies used in everyday life. Methods: The MMQ was translated into Portuguese and administered to 30 Brazilian elderly subjects. The participants underwent cognitive tests, mood scales and metamemory instruments. Results: Analyses revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach's a coefficient ranged from 0.75 to 0.89) and test-retest validity for each MMQ dimensions (positive correlations between two applications ranged from 0.75 to 0.8). Convergent validity evidence for the MMQ was confirmed by significant positive correlations (0.47 to 0.68) with dimensions of the Metamemory in Adulthood scale (MIA) (i.e., the Ability, Control, Self-efficacy and Strategy dimensions). Discriminant validity revealed no associations between the MMQ and cognitive performance, suggesting a weak metamemory-objective memory correspondence. Moreover, there was a negative correlation between MMQ-Ability subscale scores and mood symptoms (-0.63 for anxious symptoms, and -0.54 for depressive symptoms); and the Brazilian MMQ was comparable with MMQ translations to other languages. Conclusion: The Brazilian MMQ exhibits good psychometric properties and appears promising for clinical and research purposes. Additional studies are needed to further examine the psychometric properties of the Brazilian MMQ in a larger sample.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0259232
Author(s):  
Karolinne Souza Monteiro ◽  
Thayla Amorim Santino ◽  
Smita Pakhale ◽  
Louise Balfour ◽  
Karla Morganna Pereira Pinto de Mendonça

Background Information on the level of knowledge about cystic fibrosis (CF) among affected people and their families is still scarce. Objective This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt and analyze the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of Cystic Fibrosis Knowledge Scale (CFKS). Materials and methods The translation and cross-cultural adaptation involved the stages of translation, synthesis of translations, reverse translation, synthesis of reverse translations, review by a multi-professional committee of experts and pre-testing. The reliability, viability, construct, predictive, concurrent and discriminant validity were investigated. Results The sample consisted of 40 individuals with cystic CF, 47 individuals with asthma, 242 healthcare workers and 81 students from the health area. The Brazilian version of the CFKS presented high internal consistency (α = 0.91), moderate floor and ceiling effects, without differences in the test-retest scores. An analysis of factorial exploration identified three dimensions. Confirmatory factor analysis led to an acceptable data-model fit. There was good predictive validity, with a difference in the scores among all the evaluated groups (p <0.001), as well as good discriminant validity since individuals with asthma had greater knowledge of asthma compared to CF (r = 0.401, p = 0.005; r2 = 0.162). However, there was no difference between the diagnosis time and knowledge about CF (r = -0.25, p = 0.11; r2 = 0.06), either between treatment adherence and knowledge about CF (r = -0.04, p = 0.77; r2 = 0.002). Conclusion The Brazilian version of the CFKS indicated that the scale is able to provide valid, reliable and reproducible measures for evaluating the knowledge about CF.


Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. E123-E128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Bruyère ◽  
Maryline Demoulin ◽  
Charlotte Beaudart ◽  
Jonathan C. Hill ◽  
Didier Maquet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 725-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávia Cordeiro Medeiros ◽  
Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa ◽  
Indiara Soares Oliveira ◽  
Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 846-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Porcerelli ◽  
Christopher J. Hopwood ◽  
John R. Jones

A growing body of research supports the validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in evaluating community and psychiatric samples. Although maladaptive personality also has significant relevance in primary care settings, research on the PID-5 in primary care samples is limited. In this study, the authors examined the intercorrelations, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the brief form of the PID-5 (PID-5-BF) in 100 primary care outpatients. Results are consistent with findings in other samples in suggesting that PID-5 domains are moderately intercorrelated and associated with a variety of mental health variables. Smaller associations with physical health variables support the discriminant validity of the instrument. Overall, results suggest that the PID-5-BF can provide a useful psychiatric screening tool in primary care settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document