Back muscle strength is associated with bone mineral density change in healthy premenopausal women: Sendai bone health concept study

Bone ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S82
Author(s):  
K.N. Kishimoto ◽  
K. Niu ◽  
H. Guo ◽  
J. Uchimaru ◽  
K. Sato ◽  
...  
1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Itoi ◽  
Yuichiro Yamada ◽  
Minoru Sakurai ◽  
Kozo Sato ◽  
Fumio Kasama

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-356
Author(s):  
Manny Felix ◽  
Jeff McCubbin ◽  
Janet Shaw

Many women with mild to moderate mental retardation (MMR) exhibit low levels of physical activity, muscle strength, and muscle mass, which place these individuals at risk for osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD), the primary index of osteoporosis, of the femoral neck and the whole body was measured in premenopausal women with (M age = 28.14 ± 8.43) and without (M age = 29.64 ± 10.86) mental retardation (MMR and NMR, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed no differences (p > .05) between groups (MMR = 16, NMR = 16) for BMD values. Significant differences existed (p < .05) between groups on body composition and muscle strength variables. In the MMR group, significant positive relationships (p < .05) were found between lean muscle mass and both femoral neck (r = .74) and whole body (r = .81) BMD. Unaccounted lifestyle factors may have contributed to nonsignificant BMD values between groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 674.2-675
Author(s):  
A. Efremova ◽  
N. Toroptsova ◽  
N. Demin ◽  
O. Dobrovolskaya ◽  
O. Nikitinskaya

Background:Chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases are risk factors of bone loss and fractures. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has been recognized to be another potential inflammatory joint disease that may affect bone tissue.Objectives:to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and risk factors of low BMD in women with SSc.Methods:173 women, among them 110 postmenopausal (median age 60[55,63] years) and 63 premenopausal (median age 35[31,44] years). BMD was measured at lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic 4500A). Low BMD was diagnosed if the T-score was < -1.0 standard deviation (SD) in postmenopausal women and if the Z-score was < -2.0 SD in premenopausal women. The relationship between BMD and SSc patients’ characteristics was evaluated using univariate linear regression analysis.Results:Low BMD was found in 66% patients: 79% - in postmenopausal and 18% - in premenopausal women. Among postmenopausal persons osteoporosis was discovered in 47% and osteopenia – in 32% cases. In postmenopausal woman BMD of LS, FN and TH were associated with body mass index (BMI) (β=0.27, p=0.010; β=0.47, p<0,001 and β=0.45, p<0,001, respectively), duration of glucocorticoids (GCs) using (β=-0.31, p=0.008; β=-0.34, p=0.003 and β=-0.27, p=0.022, respectively); BMD of FN and TH with C-reactive protein (β= -0.32, p=0.016 and β= -0.29, p=0.029, respectively) and LS BMD with current and cumulative GCs dose (β= -0.24, p=0.039 and β= -0.29, p=0.014, respectively). In premenopausal women BMD of LS, FN and TH were associated with BMI (β=0.51, p<0,001; β=0.45, p=0.003 and β=0.47, p=0.002, respectively), duration of GCs using (β= -0.45, p=0.004; β= -0.47, p=0.003 and β= -0.48, p=0.002, respectively) and GCs cumulative dose (β= -0.48, p=0.002; β= -0.51, p=0.001 and β= -0.46, p=0.004, respectively); BMD of FN and TH with 25(ОН)D level (β=0.52, p=0.008 and β=0.54, p=0.005, respectively), and LS BMD with SSc duration (β= -0.44, p=0.004).Conclusion:Low BMD was diagnosed in 66% of women with SSc. Low BMI, GCs cumulative dose and duration of GCs using were independent risk factors for low BMD in both premenopausal and postmenopausal persons. Additional factors as SSc duration and low vitamin D level were found out for premenopausal and current GCs dose and C-reactive protein level for postmenopausal women.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. e19050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Chen ◽  
Qi Su ◽  
Yulan Tu ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Xinji Chen ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Turner ◽  
J. M. Maillet ◽  
C. Mallinckrodt ◽  
L. Cordain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document