scholarly journals Effect of Axial Ligand on the Binding Mode of M-Meso-Tetrakis(N-Methylpyridinium-4-Yl)Porphyrin to DNA and their Efficiency as an Acceptor in DNA-Mediated Energy Transfer

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 279a
Author(s):  
Seog K. Kim ◽  
Yoon Jung Jang
2003 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. 766-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir S. Chirvony

Photophysical properties of meso-tetrakis(4-N-methylpyridiniumyl)porphyrin ( TMpyP 4) and its metallocomplexes M (II) TMpy P4 ( M = Zn , Cu , Ni , Co ) bound to natural DNA and synthetic poly-, oligo- and mononucleotides are considered with a primary emphasis placed upon intermolecular interaction of the photoexcited porphyrins with the nearest environment. Quenching of the fluorescent S 1 (but not triplet T 1) state due to guanine to porphyrin electron transfer is observed for TMpyP 4 intercalated between GC base pairs of the double-strand helixes, whereas in the case of TMpyP 4 complexed with guanosine monophosphate (GMP) both S 1 and T 1 states of the porphyrin are quenched. Furthermore, a dependence of the efficiency of TMpyP 4 triplet state quenching by the dissolved molecular oxygen from air on the porphyrin localization enables one to readily distinguish porphyrin groove binding mode from intercalation. Excited states of the TMpyP 4 complexes with transition metals, in spite of their very short lifetimes, also interact with nucleic acid components by means of an axial ligand binding/release to/from the metal. A possible structure of the five-coordinate excited complex (“exciplex”) formed in case of CuTMpyP 4 groove binding to some single- and double-strand polynucleotides is discussed.


Author(s):  
R.D. Leapman ◽  
P. Rez ◽  
D.F. Mayers

Microanalysis by EELS has been developing rapidly and though the general form of the spectrum is now understood there is a need to put the technique on a more quantitative basis (1,2). Certain aspects important for microanalysis include: (i) accurate determination of the partial cross sections, σx(α,ΔE) for core excitation when scattering lies inside collection angle a and energy range ΔE above the edge, (ii) behavior of the background intensity due to excitation of less strongly bound electrons, necessary for extrapolation beneath the signal of interest, (iii) departures from the simple hydrogenic K-edge seen in L and M losses, effecting σx and complicating microanalysis. Such problems might be approached empirically but here we describe how computation can elucidate the spectrum shape.The inelastic cross section differential with respect to energy transfer E and momentum transfer q for electrons of energy E0 and velocity v can be written as


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document