What works in auditory working memory? A neural oscillations perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 1640 ◽  
pp. 193-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wilsch ◽  
Jonas Obleser
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Semprini ◽  
Gaia Bonassi ◽  
Federico Barban ◽  
Elisa Pelosin ◽  
Riccardo Iandolo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate A. Yurgil ◽  
Miguel A. Velasquez ◽  
Jenna L. Winston ◽  
Noah B. Reichman ◽  
Paul J. Colombo

2010 ◽  
Vol 473 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud Stephane ◽  
Nuri F. Ince ◽  
Michael Kuskowski ◽  
Arthur Leuthold ◽  
Ahmed H. Tewfik ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud Stephane ◽  
Arthur Leuthold ◽  
Michael Kuskowski ◽  
Kate McClannahan ◽  
Tinting Xu

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Senoussi ◽  
Pieter Verbeke ◽  
Tom Verguts

Why can't we keep as many items as we want in working memory? It has long been debated whether this resource limitation is a bug (a downside of our fallible biological system) or instead a feature (an optimal response to a computational problem). We propose that the resource limitation is a consequence of a useful feature. Specifically, we propose that flexible cognition requires time-based binding, and time-based binding necessarily limits the number of (bound) memoranda that can be stored simultaneously. Time-based binding is most naturally instantiated via neural oscillations, for which there exists ample experimental evidence. We report simulations that illustrate this theory and that relate it to empirical data. We also compare the theory to several other (feature and bug) resource theories.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Franconeri ◽  
Lace M. Padilla ◽  
Priti Shah ◽  
Jeffrey M. Zacks ◽  
Jessica Hullman

Effectively designed data visualizations allow viewers to use their powerful visual systems to understand patterns in data across science, education, health, and public policy. But ineffectively designed visualizations can cause confusion, misunderstanding, or even distrust—especially among viewers with low graphical literacy. We review research-backed guidelines for creating effective and intuitive visualizations oriented toward communicating data to students, coworkers, and the general public. We describe how the visual system can quickly extract broad statistics from a display, whereas poorly designed displays can lead to misperceptions and illusions. Extracting global statistics is fast, but comparing between subsets of values is slow. Effective graphics avoid taxing working memory, guide attention, and respect familiar conventions. Data visualizations can play a critical role in teaching and communication, provided that designers tailor those visualizations to their audience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 108063
Author(s):  
Liping Pan ◽  
Dandan Guo ◽  
Jiajing Wang ◽  
Yuhan Hao ◽  
Lulin Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document