scholarly journals Family history of cancer other than breast or ovarian cancer in first-degree relatives is associated with poor breast cancer prognosis

The Breast ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Long Song ◽  
Chuang Chen ◽  
Jing-Ping Yuan ◽  
Juan-Juan Li ◽  
Sheng-Rong Sun
2004 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 1378-1381 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Thalib ◽  
S Wedrén ◽  
F Granath ◽  
H-O Adami ◽  
B Rydh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Liu ◽  
Xiaomeng Hao ◽  
Zian Song ◽  
Xiangcheng Zhi ◽  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractFamily history is a major risk factor for breast cancer; approximately 5–10% cases of breast cancer are associated with a family history. Herein, we investigated the link between family history and breast cancer features to elucidate the importance of family history in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Data from 10,549 patients with breast cancer were collected from 2014 to 2017. Detailed information about the family history of the patients including the degree and number of relatives affected and the types of cancer was recorded. The tumors were pathologically and clinically classified based on the stage, grade, ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67 status, and subtypes, according to standard guidelines. Data were analyzed using χ2 test and multiple logistic regression. Patients with a family history of other cancer types were significantly older at diagnosis than patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer (p = 0.002) and those without a family history of cancer (p < 0.001). Patients without a family history of cancer were typically diagnosed at a later stage, including high frequency in N2 (p = 0.035) and TNM stage III (p = 0.015). Compared with patients with second-/third-degree relatives, those with first-degree relatives having breast/ovarian cancer had a higher median age (54.1, p < 0.001) at diagnosis and showed more advanced disease. No significant difference was found between ER, PR, and HER2 status in patients with and without a family history of cancer. Family history of breast cancer can influence the cancer characteristics of the patients at diagnosis, especially patient age, tumor stage, and grade.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2018-2018
Author(s):  
Loretta S. Li ◽  
Dezheng Huo ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Olufunmilayo Olopade

Abstract Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) occur in a subset of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation for various primary malignancies. Whether or not a patient develops t-MDS/t-AML can be influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of t-MDS/t-AML patients who had cytogenetic analyses performed at the University of Chicago Hospitals between 1972 and 2001 to determine if a family history of cancer could be associated with t-MDS/t-AML development. These included 141 males and 165 females whose median age was 51 years (range was from 3–83 years) at the time of primary diagnosis and 58 years (range was from 6–86 years) at the time of t-MDS/t-AML presentation. Out of 306 patients, data on first-degree family history of cancer was documented in 160 patients, but there was no statistically significant difference in the characteristics examined below between patients with self-reported family history of cancer and patients with undocumented family histories. A first-degree family history of any cancer was reported in 89 patients (55.6%). The prevalence of family history of specific sites were: 25 (15.6%) of breast cancer, 23 (14.4%) of lung cancer, 13 (8.1%) of colorectal cancer, 11 (6.9%) of hematologic malignancy, 10 (2.3%) of prostate cancer, 6 (3.8%) of stomach cancer, 5 (3.1%) of uterine cancer, 5 (3.1%) of CNS cancer, 5 (3.1%) of pancreas cancer, 4 (2.5%) of melanoma, 3 (1.9%) of oral-pharyngeal cancer, 3 (1.9%) of ovarian cancer, 3 (1.9%) of cervical cancer, 2 (1.3%) of vulvar cancer, 1 (0.6%) each of bladder cancer, sarcoma, renal cancer, or esophageal cancer. Of note, only a family history of breast cancer was associated with clinical presentation as show in Table 1 below. Patients with a family history of breast cancer were also more likely to have a chromosome 5 and/or 7 abnormality (84%) than patients without (62%, p=0.04). There was no significant association between family history of cancer at other sites and clonal cytogenetic abnormalities. A subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with a primary diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer. Of the 24 patients who had data on family history of cancer, 16.7% reported having a first degree relative with breast cancer. These findings suggest a possible genetic component linking family history of breast cancer and development of t-MDS/t-AML, as was previously reported by Rauscher et al. (2002) for de novo adult leukemia incidence. Further studies of family histories of cancer, in particular breast cancer among patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation, could potentially elucidate the genetic basis of leukemia and ultimately lead to new tools for risk assessment, early detection or prevention of secondary leukemia in cancer survivors.


Author(s):  
Alexander L. R. Grewcock ◽  
Karlijn E. P. E. Hermans ◽  
Matty P. Weijenberg ◽  
Piet A. Brandt ◽  
Caroline Loef ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urška Kotnik ◽  
Borut Peterlin ◽  
Luca Lovrecic

Abstract Background: An important number of breast and ovarian cancer cases is due to a strong genetic predisposition. The main tool for identifying individuals at risk is recognizing a suggestive family history of cancer. We present a prospective study on applying three selected clinical guidelines to a cohort of 1000 Slovenian women to determine the prevalence of at-risk women according to each of the guidelines and analyze the differences amongst the guidelines.Methods: Personal and family history of cancer was collected for 1000 Slovenian women. Guidelines by three organizations: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American College of Medical Genetics in cooperation with National Society of Genetic Counselors (ACMG/NSGC), and Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) were applied to the cohort. The number of women identified, the characteristics of the high-risk population, and the agreement between the guidelines were explored. Results: NCCN guidelines identify 16.7 % of women, ACMG/NSGC guidelines identify 7.1 % of women, and SGO guidelines identify 7.0 % of women from the Slovenian population, while 6.2 % of women are identified by all three guidelines as having high-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Conclusions: We identified 17.4 % of women from the Slovenian population as being at an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer using all of the guidelines. There are important differences between the guidelines. NCCN guidelines are the most inclusive, identifying more than twice the amount of women as high-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer as compared to the AGMG/NSCG and SGO guidelines in the Slovenian population.


2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Negri ◽  
C Pelucchi ◽  
S Franceschi ◽  
M Montella ◽  
E Conti ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Abildgaard ◽  
Magnus Glindvad Ahlström ◽  
Gedske Daugaard ◽  
Dorte Lisbet Nielsen ◽  
Anette Tønnes Pedersen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Current international guidelines recommend systemic hormone therapy (HT) to oophorectomized women until the age of natural menopause. Despite an inherited predisposition to estrogen-dependent malignancies, the guidelines also apply to women oophorectomized because of a family history of cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of HT on mortality and risk of cancer in women oophorectomized because of a family history of cancer. Methods A nationwide, population-based cohort was used to study women oophorectomized because of a family history of cancer (n = 2002). Comparison cohorts included women from the background population individually matched on age (n = 18 018). Oophorectomized women were subdivided into three groups: oophorectomized at 1) age 45 years or younger not using HT, 2) age 45 years or younger using HT, 3) older than age 45 years, and their respective population comparison cohorts. Results Women oophorectomized at age 45 years or younger using HT had increased overall mortality (mortality rate ratio [MRR] = 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53 to 7.79), mortality because of cancer (MRR = 5.67, 95% CI = 1.86 to 17.34), and risk of overall cancer (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 3.68, 95% CI = 1.93 − 6.98), primarily reflected in an increased risk of breast cancer (IRR = 4.88, 95% CI = 2.19 − 10.68). Women oophorectomized at age 45 years or younger not using HT and women oophorectomized at older than age 45 years did not have increased mortality, mortality because of cancer, or risk of overall cancer, but they had increased risk of breast cancer (IRR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.14 to 6.13, and IRR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.59, respectively). Conclusions Use of HT in women oophorectomized at age 45 years or younger with a family history of cancer is associated with increased mortality and risk of overall cancer and breast cancer. Our study warrants further investigation to establish the impact of HT on mortality and cancer risk in oophorectomized women with a family history of cancer.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 436-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulnar Azevedo S Mendonça ◽  
José Eluf-Neto

OBJECTIVE: Selecting controls is one of the most difficult tasks in the design of case-control studies. Hospital controls may be inadequate and random controls drawn from the base population may be unavailable. The aim was to assess the use of hospital visitors as controls in a case-control study on the association of organochlorinated compounds and other risk factors for breast cancer conducted in the main hospital of the "Instituto Nacional de Câncer" -- INCA (National Cancer Institute) in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). METHODS: The study included 177 incident cases and 377 controls recruited among female visitors. Three different models of control group composition were compared: Model 1, with all selected visitors; Model 2, excluding women visiting relatives with breast cancer; and Model 3, excluding all women visiting relatives with any type of cancer. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to test the associations. RESULTS: Age-adjusted OR for breast cancer associated with risk factors other than family history of cancer, except smoking and breast size, were similar in the three models. Regarding family history of all cancers, except for breast cancer, there was a decreased risk in Models 1 and 2, while in Model 3 there was an increased risk, but not statistically significant. Family history of breast cancer was a risk factor in Models 2 and 3, but no association was found in Model 1. In multivariate analysis a significant risk of breast cancer was found when there was a family history of breast cancer in Models 2 and 3 but not in Model 1. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that while investigating risk factors unrelated to family history of cancer, the use of hospital visitors as controls may be a valid and feasible alternative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document