scholarly journals Low Integrated Area of Desaturation Index after ASV Therapy is Strong Indicator to Predict Cardiovascular Events in Heart Failure Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. S184
Author(s):  
Atsushi Umeyama ◽  
Noriaki Takama ◽  
Keita Goto ◽  
Masahiro Nakajima ◽  
Kyosuke Higuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Desaturation Index ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Strong Indicator

scholarly journals Creatinine Levels at Admission as Predictors of In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Heart Failure Patient

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Farida Hanum Margolang ◽  
Refli Hasan ◽  
Abdul Halim Raynaldo ◽  
Harris Hasan ◽  
Ali Nafiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Background: Acute heart failure is a global health problem with high morbidity and mortality. Short term and long term prognosis of these patients is poor. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during hospitalization was needed to improve outcome. Creatinine levels at admission could be used as predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in acute heart failure patients because creatinine is a simple and routine biomarker of renal function examined in patients with acute heart failure. This study aimed to determine whether creatinine can be used as a predictor of major adverse adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute heart failure.Methods: This study is a prospective cohort study of 108 acute heart failure patients treated at H. Adam Malik Hospital from July 2018 to January 2019. Creatinine cut-off points were determined using the ROC curve, then bivariate and multivariate analyzes were performed to determine predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization.Results: From 108 study subjects, 24 (22.2%) subjects experienced major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization. The subjects who died were 20 people (83.4%), subjects with arrhythmia were 2 people (8.3%), and those who had stroke were 2 people (8.3 %). Through the ROC curve analysis, we found creatinine cut-off values of ≥1.7 mg / dl (AUC 0.899, 95% CI 0.840- 0.957, p <0.05). Creatinine ≥1.7 mg/dl could predict major adverse cardiovascular events with a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 79.5%. Multivariate analysis showed that creatinine ≥1.7 mg / dl was an independent factor to predict MACEs during hospitalization in this study (OR 18,310, p 0.001) as well as creatinine clearance and heart rate.Conclusion: Creatinine levels at admission is an independent predictor for major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization in acute heart failure patients.

scholarly journals Identifying Heart Failure Patients at High Risk for Near-Term Cardiovascular Events With Serial Health Status Assessments

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 115 (15) ◽  
pp. 1975-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Kosiborod ◽  
Gabriel E. Soto ◽  
Philip G. Jones ◽  
Harlan M. Krumholz ◽  
William S. Weintraub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Health Status ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Near Term

Predicting readmissions and cardiovascular events in heart failure patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mejhert ◽  
T. Kahan ◽  
H. Persson ◽  
M. Edner
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

scholarly journals 491 Short-term prognostic implications of left ventricular myocardial work indices in advanced heart failure patients treated with repetitive Levosimendan infusions

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Fazzari ◽  
Francesco Cannata ◽  
Daniele Banfi ◽  
Marta Pellegrino ◽  
Beniamino Pagliaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Global Work

Abstract Aims Repetitive Levosimendan treatment in advanced heart failure patients has not been investigated yet via myocardial work indices (MWI), which could more accurately detect the effects of this both inotropic and vasodilatory drug. The aims of this study were (1) to describe variations of myocardial work indices, as a consequence of repetitive Levosimendan infusions and (2) to assess the prognostic value of myocardial work parameters in these patients. Methods and results Fourteen patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent in-hospital levosimendan infusions were prospectively included. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment were performed before and after every Levosimendan infusion. The primary endpoint was a composite of any episode of decompensated HF, urgent HF rehospitalization, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and cardiovascular death at 4–6 weeks follow-up after each planned infusion. During follow-up (mean: 150 ± 99 days) a total of 37 infusions were performed and a total of 11 cardiovascular events occurred. Global constructive work (GCW), global work efficiency (GWE), and global work index (GWI) increased after Levosimendan infusion in 62.2%, 73.0%, and 70.3% of cases, with significant differences between patients with and without outcomes [delta GCW: −7.36 mmHg% (134.12) vs. 113.81 mmHg% (204.41), P = 0.007; delta GWE: −3.27% (8.38) vs. 4.30% (5.58), P = 0.002]. Delta value of GWE showed the largest area under curve (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00, P = 0.002) for outcome prediction with a cut-off point of 0.5%. Independent prognostic value of GWE variation was confirmed in multivariable regression models (OR: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.702–0.970, P = 0.02). Conclusions GWE and GCW provided incremental and independent prognostic value at short-term follow-up over traditional echocardiographic parameters. The differentiation of patients into ‘workers’, whose GWE improved after Levosimendan infusion, and ‘non-workers’, who failed to improve their GWE, permitted to identify patients at higher risk of forthcoming cardiovascular events. Monitoring these patients with MWI may have relevant clinical implications.

scholarly journals Heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction: clinical features and prognosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-301
Author(s):  
O V Bulashova ◽  
A A Nasybullina ◽  
E V Khazova ◽  
V M Gazizyanova ◽  
V N Oslopov
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Condition ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

Aim. To analyze clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and prognosis in patients with heart failure mid-range ejection fraction. Methods. The study included 76 patients with stable heart failure IIV functional class, with a mean age of 66.110.4 years. All patients were divided into 3 subgroups based on the left ventricular ejection fraction: the first group heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (below 40%), 21.1%; the second group patients with mid-range ejection fraction (from 40 to 49%), 23.7%; the third group patients with preserved ejection fraction (50%), 55.3%. The clinical characteristics of all groups were compared. The quality of life was assessed by the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ), the clinical condition was determined by using the clinical condition assessment scale (Russian Shocks). The prognosis was studied according to the onset of cardiovascular events one year after enrollment in the study. The endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for acutely decompensated heart failure, thrombotic complications. Statistical analysis was performed by using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. Normal distribution of the data was determined by the ShapiroWilk test, nominal indicators were compared between groups by using chi-square tests, normally distributed quantitative indicators by ANOVA. The KruskalWallis test was performed to comparing data with non-normal distribution. Results. Analysis showed that the most of clinical characteristics (etiological structure, age, gender, quality of life, results on the clinical condition assessment scale for patients with chronic heart failure and a 6-minute walk test, distribution by functional classes of heart failure) in patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) were similar to those in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). At the same time, they significantly differed from the characteristics of patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Echocardiographic data from patients with mid-range ejection fraction ranks in the middle compared to patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. In heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction, the incidence of adverse outcomes during the 1st year also was intermediate between heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and patients with reduced ejection fraction: for all cardiovascular events in the absence of significant differences (17.6; 10.8 and 18.8%, respectively), myocardial infarction (5,9; 0 and 6.2%), thrombotic complications (5.9; 5.4 and 6.2%). Heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction in comparison to patients with preserved ejection fraction and reduced ejection fraction had significantly lower cardiovascular mortality (0; 2.7 and 12.5%, p 0.05) and the number of hospitalization for acutely decompensated heart failure (0; 2,7 and 6.2%). Conclusion. Clinical characteristics of heart failure patients with mid-range and heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction are similar but significantly different from those in the group of patients with preserved ejection fraction; echocardiographic data in heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction is intermediate between those in patients with reduced ejection fraction and patients with preserved ejection fraction; the prognosis for all cardiovascular events did not differ significantly in the groups depending on the left ventricular ejection fraction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document