Modulating oscillatory brain activity correlates of behavioral inhibition using transcranial direct current stimulation

2012 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liron Jacobson ◽  
Adi Ezra ◽  
Uri Berger ◽  
Michal Lavidor
Neuroreport ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1307-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Antal ◽  
Edina T. Varga ◽  
Tamas Z. Kincses ◽  
Michael A. Nitsche ◽  
Walter Paulus

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darías Holgado ◽  
Thomas Zandonai ◽  
Luis F. Ciria ◽  
Mikel Zabala ◽  
James Hopker ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesTo test the hypothesis that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) influences performance in a 20-min time-trial self-paced exercise and electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillatory brain activity in a group of trained male cyclists.DesignThe study consisted of a pre-registered (https://osf.io/rf95j/), randomised, sham-controlled, single-blind, within-subject design experiment.Methods36 trained male cyclists, age 27 (6.8) years, weight 70.1 (9.5) Kg; VO2max: 54 (6.13) ml.min−1.kg−1, Maximal Power output: 4.77 (0.6) W/kg completed a 20-min time-trial self-paced exercise in three separate sessions, corresponding to three stimulation conditions: anodal, cathodal and sham. tDCS was administered before each test during 20-min at a current intensity of 2.0 mA. The anode electrode was placed over the DLPFC and the cathode in the contralateral shoulder. In each session, power output, heart rate, sRPE and EEG (at baseline and during exercise) was measured.ResultsThere were no differences (F = 0.31, p > 0.05) in power output between the stimulation conditions: anodal (235 W [95%CI 222 - 249 W]; cathodal (235 W [95%CI 222 - 248 W] and sham (234 W [95%CI 220 - 248 W]. Neither heart rate, sRPE nor EEG activity were affected by tDCS (all Ps > 0.05).ConclusiontDCS over the left DLFC did not affect self-paced exercise performance in trained cyclists. Moreover, tDCS did not elicit any change on oscillatory brain activity either at baseline or during exercise. Our data suggest that the effects of tDCS on endurance performance should be taken with caution.


IBRO Reports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. S440
Author(s):  
Bernis Sutcubasi ◽  
Emine Elif Tulay ◽  
Zeynep Kucuk ◽  
Zeynep Tarman ◽  
Baris Metin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davinia Fernández-Espejo ◽  
Davide Aloi ◽  
Antonio Incisa della Rocchetta ◽  
Damon Hoad ◽  
Richard Greenwood ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Therapeutic options for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) are very limited, and patients often show little to no progress over time. It is widely recognized that some PDOC patients retain a higher level of cognition that may be apparent on the basis of their external responses, and simply are unable to produce purposeful motor behaviours. This dissociation has been linked to specific impairments in the motor network that lead to a reduction in thalamo-cortical coupling. Here, we will assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate thalamo-cortical coupling and improve patients’ responsiveness. We will focus on characterising the mechanisms of action of tDCS and the bases for potential individual differences in responsiveness to the stimulation across participants.Methods: This is a multi-centre double-blind randomised crossover feasibility study. It is divided into two streams: (a) MRI stream: 5 PDOC patients will complete 5 anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation sessions (paired with passive mobilisation of the thumb) in separate weeks. We will measure brain activity and connectivity with functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography (EEG). We will look at brain structures to assess differences associated with responsiveness. (b) Bedside stream: 10 patients will complete one session of anodal or cathodal stimulation and one session of sham. We will measure brain activity and connectivity with EEG and we will conduct follow up assessments at 3 and 6 months. In both streams we will also look at changes in the clinical profile of patients with the Coma Recovery Scale Revised and in command following behaviour with electromyography and motion tracking. We will assess feasibility on measures of eligibility, recruitment, retention, and completion of tests.Discussion: This feasibility study is the first step towards developing personalised tDCS interventions to restore external responsiveness in PDOC patients. Our results will inform the design of a future trial fully powered for characterising neural, behavioural, and clinical effects of tDCS in PDOC as well as the mechanisms underlying individual differences in responsiveness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
Samuel Gowan ◽  
Brenton Hordacre

Stroke remains a global leading cause of disability. Novel treatment approaches are required to alleviate impairment and promote greater functional recovery. One potential candidate is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which is thought to non-invasively promote neuroplasticity within the human cortex by transiently altering the resting membrane potential of cortical neurons. To date, much work involving tDCS has focused on upper limb recovery following stroke. However, lower limb rehabilitation is important for regaining mobility, balance, and independence and could equally benefit from tDCS. The purpose of this review is to discuss tDCS as a technique to modulate brain activity and promote recovery of lower limb function following stroke. Preliminary evidence from both healthy adults and stroke survivors indicates that tDCS is a promising intervention to support recovery of lower limb function. Studies provide some indication of both behavioral and physiological changes in brain activity following tDCS. However, much work still remains to be performed to demonstrate the clinical potential of this neuromodulatory intervention. Future studies should consider treatment targets based on individual lesion characteristics, stage of recovery (acute vs. chronic), and residual white matter integrity while accounting for known determinants and biomarkers of tDCS response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document