Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, insulin index, insulin load and risk of diabetes-related cancers: A systematic review of cohort studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 22-31
Author(s):  
Motahare Hatami Marbini ◽  
Fatemehsadat Amiri ◽  
Zohreh Sajadi Hezaveh
2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Sadeghi ◽  
Omid Sadeghi ◽  
Mahmoud Khodadost ◽  
Aliyar Pirouzi ◽  
Banafsheh Hosseini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maryam Kazemi ◽  
Amir Hadi ◽  
Roger A Pierson ◽  
Marla E Lujan ◽  
Gordon A Zello ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) exhibit cardiometabolic (e.g., insulin resistance) and associated reproductive disruptions. Lifestyle modification (e.g., diet) is recommended as the first-line therapy to manage PCOS; however, a favorable dietary regimen remains unclear beyond energy restriction. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to summarize evidence on impacts of dietary glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) on cardiometabolic and reproductive profiles to update the International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. Databases of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through 30 October 2019, and confirmed on 25 March 2020, to identify RCTs (≥8 wk) comparing the effects of diets with lower (LGI/LGL) and higher (HGI/HGL) GI/GL on glucoregulatory outcomes, lipid profile, anthropometrics, and androgen status in PCOS. The primary outcome was HOMA-IR. Data were pooled by random-effects models and expressed as weighted mean differences and 95% CIs. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane tool. Ten RCTs (n = 403) were eligible. Eight evaluated LGI and 2 LGL diets. LGI diets decreased HOMA-IR (−0.78; −1.20, −0.37; I2 = 86.6%), fasting insulin (−2.39; −4.78, 0.00 μIU/mL; I2 = 76.8%), total cholesterol (−11.13; −18.23, −4.04 mg/dL; I2 = 0.0%), LDL cholesterol (−6.27; −12.01, −0.53 mg/dL; I2 = 0.0%), triglycerides (−14.85; −28.75, −0.95 mg/dL; I2 = 31.0%), waist circumference (−2.81; −4.40, −1.23 cm; I2 = 53.9%), and total testosterone (−0.21; −0.32, −0.09 nmol/L; I2 = 8.6%) compared with HGI diets (all: P ≤ 0.05) without affecting fasting glucose, HDL cholesterol, weight, or free androgen index (all: P ≥ 0.07). Some results were contradictory and only described narratively for 2 RCTs that evaluated LGL diets, since inclusion in meta-analyses was not possible. LGI diets improved glucoregulatory outcomes (HOMA-IR, insulin), lipid profiles, abdominal adiposity, and androgen status, conceivably supporting their inclusion for dietary management of PCOS. Further RCTs should confirm these observations and address whether LGI diets improve more patient-pressing complications, including ovulatory cyclicity, infertility, and cardiovascular disease risk in this high-risk population. This review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO as CRD42020175300.


2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 921-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farnaz Shahdadian ◽  
Parvane Saneei ◽  
Alireza Milajerdi ◽  
Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

ABSTRACT Background Previous findings on the association of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) with mortality are conflicting. Objectives The aim of this study was to summarize earlier findings on the association between dietary GI and GL and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed of electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google scholar, up to September 2018. Prospective cohort studies that reported GI and GL as the exposure and all-cause or CVD mortality as the outcome were included in the analysis. The random-effects model was used to estimate pooled RR and 95% CIs of all-cause and CVD mortality. Results Eighteen cohort studies with a total of 251,497 participants, reporting 14,774 cases of all-cause mortality and 3658 cases of CVD mortality, were included in the present analysis. No significant association was found between dietary GI and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.19) and CVD mortality (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.20). In addition, dietary GL was not associated with all-cause mortality (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.27) or CVD mortality (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.25). However, the highest dietary GI, in comparison to the lowest one, significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality in women (RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.35). No evidence for a nonlinear association between dietary GI or GL and all-cause and CVD mortality was found (P > 0.05). Conclusions This meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies showed no significant association between either dietary GI or GL and all-cause and CVD mortality in men, but a positive association of GI with all-cause mortality in women.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 2333-2340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehran Rahimlou ◽  
Nava Morshedzadeh ◽  
Soheila Karimi ◽  
Sima Jafarirad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document