Diet and bowel symptoms among colon cancer survivors

10006 Background: The ACS Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines for Cancer Survivors include: 1) healthy body weight; 2) physical activity; and 3) a diet high in vegetables, fruits, and whole grains. It is not known whether colon cancer patients who follow these guidelines have improved DFS, RFS, or OS. Methods: We conducted a prospective study among 992 stage III colon cancer patients enrolled in an adjuvant chemotherapy trial in 1999-2001. Lifestyle was assessed twice. We applied a score developed by McCullough ML et al. to quantify adherence to the ACS guidelines based on BMI; physical activity; and intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and red/processed meats (range: 0-6; higher = more healthy behaviors). Alcohol is included in the ACS guidelines for cancer prevention, but not cancer survivors; we tested the score without and with alcohol using McCullough et al.’s cut points: 0 pts = >1/d for women, >2/d for men; 1 pt = no alcohol; 2 pts = >0-1/d for women, >0-2/d for men. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS, RFS, and OS adjusting for clinical, demographic, and lifestyle factors. Results: Over 7 y median follow-up, we observed 335 recurrences and 299 deaths (43 without recurrence). Compared to patients with 0-1 pt (262, 26%), patients with 5-6 pts (91, 9%) had 42% lower risk of death (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.99; p-trend: 0.01) and a trend toward improved DFS (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.06; p-trend: 0.03). When including alcohol in the score, the adjusted HR’s comparing patients with 6-8 pts (162; 16%) to 0-2 pts (187; 91%) were: 0.49 for OS (95% CI: 0.32, 0.76; p-trend: 0.002), 0.58 for DFS (95% CI: 0.40, 0.84; p-trend: 0.01), and 0.64 for RFS (95% CI: 0.44, 0.94; p-trend: 0.05). Conclusions: Colon cancer patients with a healthy body weight who engaged in physical activity, ate a diet high in whole grains, vegetables, and fruits and low in red/processed meats, and drank moderate alcohol had longer DFS and OS than patients who did not engage in these behaviors. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, K07CA197077, R01CA118553, P50CA127003, R35CA197735. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00003835.

Download Full-text

Differential utilization of preventive care among colon cancer survivors compared to non-cancer patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.577 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 577-577

Author(s):

Sally C Lau ◽

Richard M. Lee-Ying ◽

Davis Sam ◽

Winson Y. Cheung

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Cancer Survivors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Preventive Care ◽

Low Income ◽

Urban Areas ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽

To Receive

577 Background: With advances in diagnosis and treatment, many cancer patients survive more than 5 years. The care of these cancer survivors (CS) represent an area of unmet need. We aim to characterize the patterns of preventive care in colon CS compared to non-cancer controls (NCC) and identify areas of deficiencies within the context of a universal health care system. Methods: Adult patients with non-metastatic colon cancer treated at the BC Cancer Agency between 2000-2012 were included. An age and gender matched cohort constructed from the provincial database served as NCC. Areas of preventive care examined include vaccinations, cancer, osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) screening. Multivariate regressions were done to test for associations between CS and preventive care. Results: In total, 9381 colon CS and 47187 NCC, matched at a ratio of 1:5, were analyzed. Among CS, median age of diagnosis was 68, 58% were male and 47% had stage 3 disease. The median overall survivals were 12/10/8 years for stages 1/2/3 disease respectively. 61% of these survivors died from colon cancer, 12% from other cancers and 25% from non-cancer causes. Deaths from colon cancer are more common within 5 years of diagnosis, particularly stage 3 disease. CS were more likely to receive any preventive care. In CS compared to NCC, 90% vs 85%, 47% vs 39% and 53% vs 46% of eligible patients had CVD screening, cancer screening and other preventive care respectively. This remained significant in multivariate analyses (Table). Patients who were female, had higher income and resided in urban areas were more likely to receive screening. Among CS, patients > 65 years (OR1.2, p = 0.04 95%CI 1.0-1.4), females (OR 1.5, p < 0.01 95%CI 1.3-1.8) and stages 1 or 2 disease (OR 1.3, p < 0.01 95%CI 1.1-1.5) had higher uptake of screening. Conclusions: Many colon cancer patients are long term survivors. CS are more likely to receive screening than NCC but uptake is suboptimal in certain areas. Targeted education towards certain sub-groups such as males, ≤65 years, low income and rural area patients may improve long term health outcomes. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Improving service delivery to cancer survivors in primary care settings project.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.7_suppl.52 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 52-52

Author(s):

Lewis E. Foxhall

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Colon Cancer ◽

Cancer Survivors ◽

Care Management ◽

Survivorship Care ◽

Behavioral Counseling ◽

Colon Cancers ◽

Screening And Prevention

52 Background: An estimated 14 million cancer survivors live in the U.S., with up to 18 million expected by 2020. Methods: We established a partnership with three Texas family medicine training programs to provide interactive educational sessions focused on survivors’ needs for primary prevention and lifestyle counseling, surveillance and screening, and prevention of psychosocial and long-term effects. Surveys assessing resident and PCP knowledge, self-efficacy, and practices regarding survivorship care management were administered through REDCap in July 2016 and 2017. Results: Baseline response rates were 64% (60/94) and 59% (55/93) at follow-up. Compared to baseline, providers at follow-up were significantly more likely to report being “very confident” in their knowledge about: appropriate surveillance to detect recurrent breast cancer (5% vs 24%; p = 0.01); long-term physical effects of colon cancer and its treatment (8% vs 18%; p = 0.04); potential adverse psychosocial outcomes of colon cancer treatment (24% vs 44%; p = 0.01); appropriate screening for new primary breast (29% vs 61%; p < 0.001) and colon cancers (27% vs 51%; p = 0.01); and preventive lifestyle/behavioral counseling for breast (39% vs 59%; p = 0.03) and colon cancers (37% vs 59%; p = 0.01). Participants were also more likely to “strongly agree” that they have the skills necessary to: provide follow-up care related to the colon cancer and its treatment (10% vs 28%; p = 0.02); initiate appropriate screening for other new primary cancers for breast (28% vs 56%; p < 0.01) and colon cancer survivors (28% vs 58%; p < 0.01); and conduct lifestyle/behavioral counseling to prevent cancer for breast (33% vs 53%; p = 0.03) and colon cancer survivors (34% vs 55%; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest our project has improved provider knowledge, self-efficacy, and practices regarding survivorship care management, with the highest levels in areas pertaining to screening and prevention. We aim to continue this trajectory of improvement in subsequent project years and disseminate the project to other primary care training sites in Texas and beyond.

Download Full-text