scholarly journals Identifying patients with bacterial infections using a combination of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, TRAIL, and IP-10 in the emergency department: a prospective observational cohort study

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1297-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. van der Does ◽  
P.P.M. Rood ◽  
C. Ramakers ◽  
S.C.E. Schuit ◽  
P. Patka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Cohort Study ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Observational Cohort

scholarly journals Serum C-Reactive Protein on the Prognosis of Oncology Patients with Acute Renal Failure: An Observational Cohort Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Ramon Perez Valdivieso ◽  
Maira Bes-Rastrollo ◽  
Pablo Monedero ◽  
Luis Lopez Olaondo ◽  
Jokin de Irala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Acute Renal Failure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Observational Cohort

scholarly journals Is There a Need for an Observation Period in the Emergency Department after Mild Accidental Pediatric Blunt Head Injury?.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Cohort Study ◽  
Status Change ◽  
Observational Period ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Observation Period

1. Introduction: The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of a clinical status change during the ED observation period requiring a change in disposition. 2. Methods and Materials: This IRB approved prospective observational cohort study enrolled patients aged birth to 15 years old being evaluated within 6 hours of accidental blunt head injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) >14 and normal neurological examination. The medical record was reviewed for a change in clinical status during the ED observational period. 3. Results: One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled into this study. One patient had a clinical status change (emesis) during the ED observation period representing a 0.8% clinical status change. No patient regardless of observation length or intervention(s) chosen by the provider had a change in disposition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document