The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study

Cognition ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 218 ◽  
pp. 104938
Author(s):  
Eva Gutierrez-Sigut ◽  
Marta Vergara-Martínez ◽  
Manuel Perea
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Cues ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Deaf Readers ◽  
The Impact

The impact of task demand on visual word recognition

Neuroscience ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yang ◽  
J. Zevin
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Task Demand ◽  
The Impact

The impact of orthographic connectivity on visual word recognition in Arabic: A cross-sectional study

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1413-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaid Khateb ◽  
Manal Khateb-Abdelgani ◽  
Haitham Y. Taha ◽  
Raphiq Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

DIFFERENCES IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION BETWEEN L1 AND L2 SPEAKERS

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-339
Author(s):  
Pauline Schröter ◽  
Sascha Schroeder
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Reading Development ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
School Students ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
L2 Processing ◽  
The Impact

AbstractInvestigating the impact of linguistic characteristics on visual word recognition in children, we studied whether differences in native (L1) and second language (L2) processing already emerge at the beginning of reading development. German elementary school students in grades 2 to 6 completed a battery of standardized tests and a lexical decision task (LDT). Though L1 speakers outperformed L2 speakers on German skills, groups did not differ in their overall performance on the LDT. However, results from mixed-effect models revealed greater effects for word frequency and length in L2 over L1 speakers, indicating qualitative differences in the sensitivity to linguistic information between groups. This distinction persisted across all grades and after controlling for differences in vocabulary size and reading fluency. Findings extend evidence provided for adult L2 processing, suggesting that varying language exposure shapes the development of the word-recognition system already in the early stages of reading development.

scholarly journals Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Readers: Lexicality Is Modulated by Communication Mode

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e59080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Barca ◽  
Giovanni Pezzulo ◽  
Marianna Castrataro ◽  
Pasquale Rinaldi ◽  
Maria Cristina Caselli
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Communication Mode ◽  
Deaf Readers

scholarly journals Embodied Semantic Effects in Visual Word Recognition

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Connell ◽  
Dermot Lynott
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Semantic Content ◽  
Sensory Experience ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Object Interaction ◽  
Sensorimotor Information ◽  
The Impact

We review the range of embodied semantic effects that have been found in visual word recognition paradigms (lexical decision, naming). Many different embodied effects have been elicited by distinct measures of sensorimotor information, and are associated with different theoretical accounts of why semantic content affects how quickly a word can be recognised. We discuss effects due to imageability, body-object interaction, relative embodiment, sensory experience, and modality-specific perceptual strength. Finally, we discuss the impact of embodied semantic effects on current models of visual word recognition.

Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 2334-2344
Author(s):  
Orna Peleg ◽  
Galia Ben-hur ◽  
Osnat Segal
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Phonological Coding ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Deaf Readers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multiple Meanings

Purpose Studies on reading in individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss (deaf) raise the possibility that, due to deficient phonological coding, deaf individuals may rely more on orthographic–semantic links than on orthographic–phonological links. However, the relative contribution of phonological and semantic information to visual word recognition in deaf individuals was not directly assessed in these studies. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to examine the interplay between orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations during visual word recognition, in deaf versus hearing adults. Method Deaf and hearing participants were asked to perform a visual lexical decision task in Hebrew. The critical stimuli consisted of three types of Hebrew words, which differ in terms of their relationship between orthography, phonology, and semantics: unambiguous words, homonyms, and homographs. Results In the hearing group, phonological effects were more pronounced than semantic effects: Homographs (multiple pronunciations) were recognized significantly slower than homonyms or unambiguous words (one pronunciation). However, there was no significant difference between homonyms (multiple meanings) and unambiguous words (one meaning). In contrast, in the deaf group, there was no significant difference among the three word types, indicating that visual word recognition, in these participants, is driven primarily by orthography. Conclusion While visual word recognition in hearing readers is accomplished mainly via orthographic–phonological connections, deaf readers rely mainly on orthographic–semantic connections.

Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 14-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Taft ◽  
Joe Xu ◽  
Sonny Li
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document