High performance cellulose acetate propionate composites reinforced with exfoliated graphene

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 3412-3418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil Woo Jeon ◽  
Ji-Eun An ◽  
Young Gyu Jeong
Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1701
Author(s):  
Kirsi Immonen ◽  
Pia Willberg-Keyriläinen ◽  
Jarmo Ropponen ◽  
Asta Nurmela ◽  
Sini Metsä-Kortelainen ◽  
...  

The increasing environmental awareness is driving towards novel sustainable high-performance materials applicable for future manufacturing technologies like additive manufacturing (AM). Cellulose is abundantly available renewable and sustainable raw material. This work focused on studying the properties of thermoplastic cellulose-based composites and their properties using injection molding and 3D printing of granules. The aim was to maximize the cellulose content in composites. Different compounds were prepared using cellulose acetate propionate (CAP) and commercial cellulose acetate propionate with plasticizer (CP) as polymer matrices, microcellulose (mc) and novel cellulose-ester additives; cellulose octanoate (C8) and cellulose palmitate (C16). The performance of compounds was compared to a commercial poly(lactic acid)-based cellulose fiber containing composite. As a result, CP-based compounds had tensile and Charpy impact strength properties comparable to commercial reference, but lower modulus. CP-compounds showed glass transition temperature (Tg) over 58% and heat distortion temperature (HDT) 12% higher compared to reference. CAP with C16 had HDT 82.1 °C. All the compounds were 3D printable using granular printing, but CAP compounds had challenges with printed layer adhesion. This study shows the potential to tailor thermoplastic cellulose-based composite materials, although more research is needed before obtaining all-cellulose 3D printable composite material with high-performance.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 849-851
Author(s):  
Titus H. J. Huisman

Testing of cord blood or newborn blood samples for hemoglobin abnormalities should include clinically important hemoglobinopathies other than sickle cell anemia (SS), such as SC, SD, SO, S-β- thalassemia (thal), EE, SE, and α-thal, and should place the quality of the testing procedures (ie, accuracy of diagnosis) above quantity (ie, number of samples tested over a given period). There is no single method available that is suitable for the identification of each of the numerous abnormalities; thus, at least two, and often more than two, procedures must be used to reach a definitive diagnosis. For this reason, blood samples collected in vacutainers with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as anticoagulant are preferred to those collected on filter papers. The latter approach also has the disadvantage that, under a less than optimal transport system, hemoglobin is readily modified (oxidation, glycosylation, protein-protein interaction), producting extra bands or peaks in electrophoretic or chromatographic separations that interfere with an appropriate identification of various genetically determined hemoglobin variants. In our laboratories, in which hemoglobin identification has been routine for more than 25 years, we consider the following procedures acceptable primary testing methods: starch gel electrophoresis at pH 8.9, cellulose acetate electrophoresis at pH 8.5 to 8.9, isoelectric focusing, and fast cation exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The following five methods are excellent confirmatory testing procedures: citrate agar electrophoresis at pH 6.1, cation or anion exchange macrochromatography, isoelectric focusing, cation exchange HPLC, and immunologic procedures. Combinations of these techniques will often lead to acceptable data, and the general approach followed in our institute is given in Fig 1. Cellulose acetate electrophoresis at alkaline pH is still the primary testing procedure, and citrate agar electrophoresis at pH 6.1 and micro-HPLC procedures are the main confirmatory methods.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (26) ◽  
pp. 23261-23270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andinet Ejigu ◽  
Lewis W. Le Fevre ◽  
Kazunori Fujisawa ◽  
Mauricio Terrones ◽  
Andrew J. Forsyth ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document