Micro- and macrocracking behaviors in granite and molded gypsum containing a single flaw

2021 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 123452
Author(s):  
Guokai Zhang ◽  
Mingyang Wang ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Songlin Yue ◽  
Zhu Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
M. A. Hussain ◽  
M. McKee ◽  
J. Frankel

Abstract In this paper we present some preliminary numerical simulations which allow us to predict a single flaw in a simply connected body. The purpose of this investigation was to detect flaws and cracks of engineering components using the method of electrical current computed tomography (ECCT), which is used in non-destructive testing technology. As in the previous paper, we have utilized the network analogy to detect a single flaw anywhere in the object. For detection of multiple flaws, the analysis has to be refined to give consistent results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huilin Le ◽  
Shaorui Sun ◽  
Pinnaduwa Hewa Shanthikumar Wijayan Kulatilake ◽  
Jihong Wei

Author(s):  
Shinji Konosu ◽  
Masato Kano ◽  
Norihiko Mukaimachi ◽  
Shinichiro Kanamaru

General components such as pressure vessels, piping, storage tanks and so on are designed in accordance with the construction codes based on the assumption that there are no flaws in such components. There are, however, numerous instances in which in-service single or multiple volumetric flaws (local thin areas; volumetric flaws) are found in the equipment concerned. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a Fitness for Service (FFS) rule, which is capable of judging these flaws. The procedure for a single flaw or multiple flaws has recently been proposed by Konosu for assessing the flaws in the p–M (pressure-moment) Diagram, which is an easy way to visualize the status of the component with flaws simultaneously subjected to internal pressure, p and external bending moment, M due to earthquake, etc. If the assessment point (Mr, pr) lies inside the p–M line, the component with flaws is judged to be safe. In this paper, numerous experiments and FEAs for a cylinder with external multiple volumetric flaws were conducted under (1) pure internal pressure, (2) pure external bending moment, and (3) subjected simultaneously to both internal pressure and external bending moment, in order to determine the plastic collapse load at volumetric flaws by applying the twice-elastic slope (TES) as recommended by ASME. It has been clarified that the collapse (TES) loads are much the same as those calculated under the proposed p–M line based on the measured yield stress.


Author(s):  
B. Bezensek ◽  
K. Miyazaki

Multiple flaws in vessels and pipes are frequently assessed as a larger single flaw in accordance with the flaw alignment and combination rules. In this paper the alignment of two through-wall flaws is examined for plates in tension and pipes in bending using detailed finite element (FE) modelling. The FE model is developed using the Gurson-Tvergaard damage model and accurately describes the flaw interaction and load capacity of a random experimental sample. Results suggests that two flaws should be aligned onto the same plane for the purpose of assessment when the separation between the parallel planes containing flaws equals the flaw length for both, plates in tension and pipes in bending.


Author(s):  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Hideo Kobayashi

Flaw evaluation for fully-plastic fracture uses the limit load criterion. As stainless steels are high toughness ductile materials, limit load criterion is applicable to stainless steel pipes. When a single circumferential flaw is detected in a stainless steel pipe during in-service inspection, the single flaw is evaluated in accordance with Article EB-4000 in the JSME Code or Appendix C in the ASME Code, Section XI. However, multiple flaws such as stress corrosion cracking are sometimes detected in the same circumferential cress-section in a pipe. If the distance between adjacent flaws is short, the multiple flaws are considered as a single flaw in compliance with combination rules. Failure stress is easily calculated by the equations given by Article EB-4000 or Appendix C. If the two flaws are separated by a large distance, it is not required to combine the two flaws. Each flaw is treated as independent. However, there are no equations for evaluating collapse stress for a pipe containing multiple independent flaws in Article EB-4000 and Appendix C. The present paper focus on a proposal of simple equations for evaluating collapse stresses for pipes containing multiple circumferential part-through wall flaws.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document