scholarly journals Patient-reported quality of life and toxicity in unilateral and bilateral radiotherapy for early-stage human papillomavirus associated tonsillar carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Lachlan McDowell ◽  
Georgina Casswell ◽  
Mathias Bressel ◽  
Karla Gough ◽  
Allison Drosdowsky ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CMENT.S40219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria K. Peltola ◽  
Joel S. Lehikoinen ◽  
Lauri T. Sippola ◽  
Kauko Saarilahti ◽  
Antti A. Mäkitie

Introduction The patient's role in toxicity reporting is increasingly acknowledged. There is also a need for developing modern communication methods between the patient and the medical personnel. Furthermore, the increasing number of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is reflected in the volume of treatment follow-up visits, which remains a challenge for the health care. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) measures may provide a cost-efficient way to organize follow-up for cancer patients. Materials and Methods We tested a novel ePRO application called Kaiku®, which enables real-time, online collection of patient-reported outcomes, such as side effects caused by treatment and quality of life. We conducted a pilot study to assess the suitability of Kaiku® for HNC patients at the Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Patients used Kaiku® during and one month after radiotherapy to report treatment-related side effects and quality of life. Two physicians and a nurse performed the practical electronic communication part of the study. Results Five of the nine patients agreed to participate in the study: three of them had local early-stage larynx cancer (T2N0, T1aN0, and T2N0) and the remaining two patients had early-stage base of tongue cancer (T2N0 and T1N2b). The degree of side effects reported by the patients via Kaiku® ranged from mild to life threatening. The number of outcome data points on patients' progress was significantly increased, which resulted in a better follow-up and improved communication between the patient and the care team. Conclusions Kaiku® seems to be a suitable tool to monitor side effects and quality of life during and after radiotherapy among HNC patients. Kaiku® and similar tools could be useful in organizing a cost-effective follow-up process for HNC patients. We recommend conducting a larger study to further assess the impact of an ePRO solution in routine clinical practice. • ePRO solutions may aid in the follow-up for cancer patients. • They seem suitable to monitor, for example, side effects and quality of life. • These systems ensure fast patient-driven reporting.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1148-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Lagerwaard ◽  
Neil K. Aaronson ◽  
Chad M. Gundy ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek ◽  
Ben J. Slotman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
Marina Caldana ◽  
Davide Lombardi ◽  
Silvia Urbani ◽  
Francesca Pellini ◽  
Sara Mirandola ◽  
...  

Background: In women undergoing breast surgery, Measurement of Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs) is important for improving the process of care, focusing on the patient's perspective. BREASTQ is a validated patient-reported outcome measure used increasingly in aesthetic and recostructive surgery. Only recently a breast conserving therapy module (BREASTQ-BCT) has been available. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life using BREAST-Q questionnaire in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus IORT.Methods: Women undergoing BCS plus IORT for an early-stage breast cancer for at least a year were invited by telephone to partecipate. We scheduled dedicated outpatient visits to our center. The medical interviewer collected medical history information and administered the BREASTQ-BCT in paper format. Data were inserted in a de-identified database. Univariate regression analysis was used to identify clinicopathological variables associated with "satisfaction with breast" domain score.Results: Overall, 38 women completed the questionnaire. The domains of the questionnaire that obtained the lowest scores were ‘satisfaction with IORT information’ and ‘satisfaction with breasts’ (median score 59, IQR 55-73 and 51-69.5). Weight of specimen and vascular invasion were risk factors for lower ‘Satisfaction with breasts’ at univariate analysis. There was a moderate-strong correlation between 'satisfaction with the breasts' and 'psychosocial wellbeing' and 'Sexual wellbeing'.Conclusions: In this retrospective study, without a pre-operative questionnaire, changes in individuals’ satisfaction and quality of life could not be identified. A prospective study comparing BCS plus external RT group and BCS plus IORT group could be informative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document