scholarly journals Clinical evidence for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma: Current paradigms and emerging treatment options

2020 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 102072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Koufopoulou ◽  
Paulo A.P. Miranda ◽  
Paulina Kazmierska ◽  
Sohan Deshpande ◽  
Priyanka Gaitonde
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 262-262
Author(s):  
Shinji Urakami ◽  
Junji Yonese ◽  
Yasuhisa Fujii ◽  
Shinya Yamamoto ◽  
Takeshi Yuasa ◽  
...  

262 Background: We had previously reported the phase I/II study of a combination regimen of gemcitabine, etoposide, and cisplatin (GEP) in second-line treatment for patients with advanced UC. This study sought to examine the combination chemotherapy of GEP as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) to assess efficacy, feasibility, prognostic factors, and the impact of postchemotherapy surgery on outcomes. Methods: Forty-two patients were treated with GEP as first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC. GEP was recycled every 4 weeks. Etoposide and cisplatin were given on days 1 through 3 at doses of 60 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2, respectively, and gemcitabine was given on days 1, 8, and 15 at a dose of 800 mg/m2. Results: The median patient age was 64 years. Twenty-three male patients and 19 female patients were included. The primary cancer site is urinary bladder in 21 patients, and upper urinary tract in 21 patients. Nineteen had visceral/bone metastases, 16 had disease restricted to lymph nodes, and the remaining 7 had unresectable disease at primary site. The median number of GEP courses was 4. Thirty of 42 assessable patients (71.4%) demonstrated objective responses. At a median follow-up of 14.6 months, the median overall survival time (OS) was 16.2 months. Twenty-four of 30 responders underwent postchemotherapy surgeries. Median OS in the patients with postchemotherapy surgery was 25.4 months. In the multivariable analysis, anemia and visceral/bone metastasis were significant pretreatment prognostic factors for OS. In addition, being male and anemic were independent poor prognostic factors in patients with postchemotherapy surgery. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 84%, 73% and 57%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: GEP as first-line chemotherapy in combined-multimodality treatment is active and moderately tolerable for advanced UC. Postchemotherapy surgery may yield favorable outcomes in patients who achieved objective responses. Anemia and visceral/bone metastasis were independent pretreatment predictors for OS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nedal Bukhari ◽  
Humaid O. Al-Shamsi ◽  
Faisal Azam

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been the standard of care in the first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Treatment of metastatic disease following progression on platinum-based regimens has evolved significantly in the last few years. Clinical trials are currently ongoing to determine how best to use and sequence these treatments. In this minireview, we will review current first-line treatment options in both cisplatin fit and cisplatin unfit patients and advances in first- and second-line treatments including chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This review reports key findings from the clinical trials especially highlighting the importance of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of bladder/urothelial carcinomas.


2005 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ardavanis ◽  
D Tryfonopoulos ◽  
A Alexopoulos ◽  
C Kandylis ◽  
G Lainakis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianzheng Wang ◽  
Qingli Li ◽  
Huifang Lv ◽  
Caiyun Nie ◽  
Beibei Chen ◽  
...  

The prognosis of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma is dismal. Platinum-based chemotherapy is still the main first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma, while immunotherapy can be used as a first-line treatment option for people who cannot tolerate platinum. Immunotherapy is preferred in the second-line treatment of bladder urothelial carcinoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (Ddurvalumab and avelumab) have not been approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer in China. We describe a patient with advanced urothelial carcinoma experienced disease progression after gemcitabine chemotherapy. Following a treatment of domestic PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab), the patient achieved a durable complete response with mild toxicity. This case indicates that PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab might be a second-line treatment choice for advanced urothelial carcinoma.


Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristotle Bamias ◽  
Lia A. Moulopoulos ◽  
Aggelos Koutras ◽  
Gerassimos Aravantinos ◽  
George Fountzilas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document