Gemcitabine plus cisplatin, followed by docetaxel, is an active first-line treatment against advanced urothelial carcinoma,

2007 ◽  
Vol &NA; (1570) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
&NA;
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 262-262
Author(s):  
Shinji Urakami ◽  
Junji Yonese ◽  
Yasuhisa Fujii ◽  
Shinya Yamamoto ◽  
Takeshi Yuasa ◽  
...  

262 Background: We had previously reported the phase I/II study of a combination regimen of gemcitabine, etoposide, and cisplatin (GEP) in second-line treatment for patients with advanced UC. This study sought to examine the combination chemotherapy of GEP as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) to assess efficacy, feasibility, prognostic factors, and the impact of postchemotherapy surgery on outcomes. Methods: Forty-two patients were treated with GEP as first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC. GEP was recycled every 4 weeks. Etoposide and cisplatin were given on days 1 through 3 at doses of 60 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2, respectively, and gemcitabine was given on days 1, 8, and 15 at a dose of 800 mg/m2. Results: The median patient age was 64 years. Twenty-three male patients and 19 female patients were included. The primary cancer site is urinary bladder in 21 patients, and upper urinary tract in 21 patients. Nineteen had visceral/bone metastases, 16 had disease restricted to lymph nodes, and the remaining 7 had unresectable disease at primary site. The median number of GEP courses was 4. Thirty of 42 assessable patients (71.4%) demonstrated objective responses. At a median follow-up of 14.6 months, the median overall survival time (OS) was 16.2 months. Twenty-four of 30 responders underwent postchemotherapy surgeries. Median OS in the patients with postchemotherapy surgery was 25.4 months. In the multivariable analysis, anemia and visceral/bone metastasis were significant pretreatment prognostic factors for OS. In addition, being male and anemic were independent poor prognostic factors in patients with postchemotherapy surgery. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 84%, 73% and 57%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: GEP as first-line chemotherapy in combined-multimodality treatment is active and moderately tolerable for advanced UC. Postchemotherapy surgery may yield favorable outcomes in patients who achieved objective responses. Anemia and visceral/bone metastasis were independent pretreatment predictors for OS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 102072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Koufopoulou ◽  
Paulo A.P. Miranda ◽  
Paulina Kazmierska ◽  
Sohan Deshpande ◽  
Priyanka Gaitonde

2005 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ardavanis ◽  
D Tryfonopoulos ◽  
A Alexopoulos ◽  
C Kandylis ◽  
G Lainakis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianzheng Wang ◽  
Qingli Li ◽  
Huifang Lv ◽  
Caiyun Nie ◽  
Beibei Chen ◽  
...  

The prognosis of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma is dismal. Platinum-based chemotherapy is still the main first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma, while immunotherapy can be used as a first-line treatment option for people who cannot tolerate platinum. Immunotherapy is preferred in the second-line treatment of bladder urothelial carcinoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (Ddurvalumab and avelumab) have not been approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer in China. We describe a patient with advanced urothelial carcinoma experienced disease progression after gemcitabine chemotherapy. Following a treatment of domestic PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab), the patient achieved a durable complete response with mild toxicity. This case indicates that PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab might be a second-line treatment choice for advanced urothelial carcinoma.


Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristotle Bamias ◽  
Lia A. Moulopoulos ◽  
Aggelos Koutras ◽  
Gerassimos Aravantinos ◽  
George Fountzilas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS588-TPS588
Author(s):  
Feng BI ◽  
Han-Zhong Li ◽  
Shaoxing Zhu ◽  
Qing Zou ◽  
Jia Tang ◽  
...  

TPS588 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Checkpoint inhibitors (ie, anti-PD-1 antibodies) are first-line treatment options for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Combining anti-PD-1 treatment with chemotherapy may have synergistic effects and has demonstrated antitumor activity in a variety of tumor types. Tislelizumab, an investigational monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity for PD-1, was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages in order to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. Previous reports showed tislelizumab, as a single agent or combined with chemotherapy, was generally well tolerated and had antitumor activity in patients with advanced UC. Methods: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT03967977) will compare the efficacy and safety/tolerability of tislelizumab vs placebo, both in combination with cisplatin/carboplatin and gemcitabine. Adult Chinese patients (n≈420) with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced/metastatic UC who are eligible for (but have not received) systemic anticancer therapy for advanced UC, therapies targeting PD-1/L1, or other antibody/drug targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways, will be randomized 1:1 to receive tislelizumab (200 mg Q3W) or placebo (Q3W) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 administered on Day 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) or carboplatin (AUC 4.5) administered on Day 1 or 2 of each 3-week cycle. Patients must provide a fresh biopsy or archival tissue for central assessment of PD-L1 expression. Overall survival (OS) is the primary endpoint. Investigator-assessed overall response rate (RECIST v1.1), duration of response, progression-free survival, and OS rates at Year 1 and 2 are secondary endpoints. Safety/tolerability, assessed by monitoring incidence and severity of adverse events, and health-related quality-of-life measures will also be evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT03967977.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document