scholarly journals Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Modulates Monkey Visuomotor Behavior

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 2430-2433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Deffieux ◽  
Youliana Younan ◽  
Nicolas Wattiez ◽  
Mickael Tanter ◽  
Pierre Pouget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Visuomotor Behavior ◽  
Low Intensity

scholarly journals Low intensity focused ultrasound modulates monkey visuomotor behavior

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Deffieux ◽  
Nicolas Wattiez ◽  
Mickael Tanter ◽  
Pierre Pouget ◽  
Jean-Francois Aubry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Visuomotor Behavior ◽  
Low Intensity

Effects of External Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound on Inflammatory Markers in Neuropathic Pain

2021 ◽  
pp. 135977
Author(s):  
Abigail Hellman ◽  
Alicia Clum ◽  
Teresa Maietta ◽  
Adithya Srikanthan ◽  
Vraj Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Low Intensity

scholarly journals Noninvasive neuromodulation and thalamic mapping with low-intensity focused ultrasound

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 875-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Dallapiazza ◽  
Kelsie F. Timbie ◽  
Stephen Holmberg ◽  
Jeremy Gatesman ◽  
M. Beatriz Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Thalamic Nucleus ◽  
Acoustic Energy ◽  
Similar Degree ◽  
Thalamic Nuclei ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Tissue Heating ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Selective Mapping ◽  
Noninvasive Neuromodulation

OBJECTIVEUltrasound can be precisely focused through the intact human skull to target deep regions of the brain for stereotactic ablations. Acoustic energy at much lower intensities is capable of both exciting and inhibiting neural tissues without causing tissue heating or damage. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the effects of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) for neuromodulation and selective mapping in the thalamus of a large-brain animal.METHODSTen Yorkshire swine (Sus scrofa domesticus) were used in this study. In the first neuromodulation experiment, the lemniscal sensory thalamus was stereotactically targeted with LIFU, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were monitored. In a second mapping experiment, the ventromedial and ventroposterolateral sensory thalamic nuclei were alternately targeted with LIFU, while both trigeminal and tibial evoked SSEPs were recorded. Temperature at the acoustic focus was assessed using MR thermography. At the end of the experiments, all tissues were assessed histologically for damage.RESULTSLIFU targeted to the ventroposterolateral thalamic nucleus suppressed SSEP amplitude to 71.6% ± 11.4% (mean ± SD) compared with baseline recordings. Second, we found a similar degree of inhibition with a high spatial resolution (∼ 2 mm) since adjacent thalamic nuclei could be selectively inhibited. The ventromedial thalamic nucleus could be inhibited without affecting the ventrolateral nucleus. During MR thermography imaging, there was no observed tissue heating during LIFU sonications and no histological evidence of tissue damage.CONCLUSIONSThese results suggest that LIFU can be safely used to modulate neuronal circuits in the central nervous system and that noninvasive brain mapping with focused ultrasound may be feasible in humans.

Quantification of Displacement for Tactile Sensation in a Contact-type Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Haptic Device

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jeongbong Choi ◽  
Soonhyun Yook ◽  
In Young Kim ◽  
Mok Kun Jeong ◽  
Dong Pyo Jang
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Haptic Device ◽  
Tactile Sensation ◽  
Contact Type ◽  
Low Intensity

Modulating the Inflammatory Reflex in Rats Using Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 481-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey M. Wasilczuk ◽  
Kelsey C. Bayer ◽  
Jesse P. Somann ◽  
Gabriel O. Albors ◽  
Jennifer Sturgis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vagus Nerve ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Ultrasound Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

In vivo MRI visualization of release from liposomes triggered by local application of pulsed low-intensity non-focused ultrasound

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e901-e904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Rizzitelli ◽  
Pierangela Giustetto ◽  
Cinzia Boffa ◽  
Daniela Delli Castelli ◽  
Juan Carlos Cutrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Local Application ◽  
Low Intensity

scholarly journals Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates cortical and thalamic motor activity in awake sheep

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Chul Kim ◽  
Wonhye Lee ◽  
Jennifer Kunes ◽  
Kyungho Yoon ◽  
Ji Eun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Behavioral Observation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Motion Artifacts ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Hind Limbs ◽  
Brain Tissue Damage

AbstractTranscranial application of pulsed low-intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) modulates the excitability of region-specific brain areas, and anesthetic confounders on brain activity warrant the evaluation of the technique in awake animals. We examined the neuromodulatory effects of FUS in unanesthetized sheep by developing a custom-fit headgear capable of reproducibly placing an acoustic focus on the unilateral motor cortex (M1) and corresponding thalamic area. The efferent responses to sonication, based on the acoustic parameters previously identified in anesthetized sheep, were measured using electromyography (EMG) from both hind limbs across three experimental conditions: on-target sonication, off-target sonication, and without sonication. Excitatory sonication yielded greater amplitude of EMG signals obtained from the hind limb contralateral to sonication than that from the ipsilateral limb. Spurious appearance of motion-related EMG signals limited the amount of analyzed data (~ 10% selection of acquired data) during excitatory sonication, and the averaged EMG response rates elicited by the M1 and thalamic stimulations were 7.5 ± 1.4% and 6.7 ± 1.5%, respectively. Suppressive sonication, while sheep walked on the treadmill, temporarily reduced the EMG amplitude from the limb contralateral to sonication. No significant change was found in the EMG amplitudes during the off-target sonication. Behavioral observation throughout the study and histological analysis showed no sign of brain tissue damage caused by the acoustic stimulation. Marginal response rates observed during excitatory sonication call for technical refinement to reduce motion artifacts during EMG acquisitions as well as acoustic aberration correction schemes to improve spatial accuracy of sonication. Yet, our results indicate that low-intensity FUS modulated the excitability of regional brain tissues reversibly and safely in awake sheep, supporting its potential in theragnostic applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document