scholarly journals Dissecting teleost B cell differentiation using transcription factors

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 898-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patty Zwollo
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pier Paolo Piccaluga ◽  
Claudio Agostinelli ◽  
Fabio Fuligni ◽  
Simona Righi ◽  
Claudio Tripodo ◽  
...  

The interferon-inducible DNA sensor IFI16 is involved in the modulation of cellular survival, proliferation, and differentiation. In the hematopoietic system, IFI16 is consistently expressed in the CD34+ stem cells and in peripheral blood lymphocytes; however, little is known regarding its regulation during maturation of B- and T-cells. We explored the role of IFI16 in normal B-cell subsets by analysing its expression and relationship with the major transcription factors involved in germinal center (GC) development and plasma-cell (PC) maturation.IFI16mRNA was differentially expressed in B-cell subsets with significant decrease inIFI16mRNA in GC and PCs with respect to naïve and memory subsets.IFI16mRNA expression is inversely correlated with a few master regulators of B-cell differentiation such asBCL6, XBP1, POU2AF1, andBLIMP1. In contrast,IFI16expression positively correlated withSTAT3, REL, SPIB, RELA, RELB, IRF4, STAT5B, andSTAT5A. ARACNE algorithm indicated a direct regulation ofIFI16byBCL6,STAT5B, andRELB, whereas the relationship betweenIFI16and the other factors is modulated by intermediate factors. In addition, analysis of the CD40 signaling pathway showed thatIFI16gene expression directly correlated with NF-κB activation, indicating that IFI16 could be considered an upstream modulator of NF-κB in human B-cells.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4341-4341
Author(s):  
Nikki R. Kong ◽  
Li Chai ◽  
Astar Winoto ◽  
Robert Tjian

Abstract Hematopoiesis is a multi-step developmental process that requires an intricate coordination of signal relays and transcriptional regulation to give rise to all blood lineages in the organism. Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) can be driven to differentiate along three main lineages: myeloid, erythroid, and lymphoid. One of the earliest lineage decisions for HSPCs is whether to adopt the lymphoid or myeloid fate. Despite the discovery of several transcription factors required for different lineages of hematopoietic differentiation, the understanding of how gene expression allows HSPCs to adopt the lymphoid fate still remains incomplete. A study using an inducible hematopoietic-specific (Mx1-Cre) KO mouse line found that Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2C (MEF2C) is required for multi-potent HSPCs to differentiate into the lymphoid lineage (Stehling-Sun et al, 2009). However, the mechanisms of how MEF2C is activated and in turn, drives lymphoid fate specification are not known. Through a candidates approach with co-expression and co-immunoprecipitation, we have identified Early B Cell Factor 1 (EBF1) to be a specific interacting partner of MEF2C, and not other B cell specific transcription factors such as E12, E47, or PAX5. Genome-wide survey of MEF2C and EBF1 binding sites via chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) in a proB cell line revealed that these two sequence-specific transcription factors co-occupy the promoters and intragenic regions of many B cell specific genes such as Il7ra, Myb, Foxo1, Ets1, Ebf1 itself, and Pou2af1. Regulatory regions of Il7ra and Foxo1 derived from the ChIP-seq data, as well as an artificial enhancer containing trimerized MEF2C and EBF1 binding sites, were examined in luciferase reporter assays and found to be sufficient to drive transcription from a minimal reporter in 293T cells. Further, this activation was co-dependent on MEF2C and EBF1 expression. The functional relevance of MEF2C binding was further supported by gene expression analyses of MEF2C-regulated B lineage genes in Mx1-Cre Mef2c KO mice compared to WT mice. Consistent with ChIP-seq and luciferase reporter assays, Myb, Ebf1, Il7ra, and Foxo1 all had significantly decreased expression levels in MEF2C-null HSPCs as well as B lineage progenitor cells, compared to sex-matched littermate control mice. Interestingly, myeloid gene expression in Mef2c-KO mice was increased compared to WT control. MEF2C ChIP-seq in a murine HSPC line revealed that it binds myeloid lineage gene targets that are not regulated by MEF2C in proB cells. These results suggest that MEF2C can repress myeloid gene expression in HSPCs. To elucidate the mechanism of this functional switch, we tested the requirement for MAPK pathways to phosphorylate and activate MEF2C at three previously identified residues in order to drive B cell differentiation. Inhibition of p38 MAPK (p38i), but not ERK1/2/5, decreased the potential of HSPCs to differentiate into B220+CD19+ B cells cultured with cytokines that drive this particular lineage fate. Instead, p38i-treated progenitor cells gave rise to more myeloid cells. 65% of this phenotype was rescued by over-expressing a phosphomimetic mutant of MEF2C that can bypass p38 inhibition. Furthermore, MEF2C is known to bind class II HDAC proteins to repress gene expression, providing a possible mechanism for its repression of myeloid transcription program. Supporting this mechanism, phosphomimetic and HDAC-binding double mutant of MEF2C can rescue p38 inhibition phenotype almost 100%. Taken together, this study elucidated the molecular mechanisms of a key lymphoid-specific lineage fate determinant, MEF2C. We discovered that p38 MAPK converts MEF2C from a transcriptional repressor to an activator by phosphorylation in B cell specification, which can be applied to understanding other cell differentiation processes regulated by this important stress-induced signaling pathway. Furthermore, we identified MEF2C’s binding and co-activating partner EBF1, several novel B cell specific targets that it activates in proB cells, and a novel myeloid transcription program that it represses in hematopoietic progenitors. Therefore, these results expanded our understanding of the intricate transcription network that regulates B cell differentiation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Gutiérrez del Burgo ◽  
Tirso Pons ◽  
Enrique Vázquez de Luis ◽  
Carlos Martínez-A ◽  
Ricardo Villares

ABSTRACTThe development of hematopoietic lineages is based on a complex balance of transcription factors whose expression depends on the epigenetic signatures that characterize each differentiation step. The B cell lineage arises from hematopoietic stem cells through the stepwise silencing of stemness genes and balanced expression of mutually regulated transcription factors, as well as DNA rearrangement. Here we report the impact on B cell differentiation of the lack of DIDO3, a reader of chromatin status, in the mouse hematopoietic compartment. We found reduced DNA accessibility in hematopoietic precursors, leading to severe deficiency in the generation of successive B cell differentiation stages. The expression of essential transcription factors and differentiation markers is affected, as is the somatic recombination process.One Sentence Summary: Epigenetic control of early hematopoiesis


Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 2633
Author(s):  
Casper Marsman ◽  
Tineke Jorritsma ◽  
Anja ten Brinke ◽  
S. Marieke van Ham

The flow cytometric detection of intracellular (IC) signaling proteins and transcription factors (TFs) will help to elucidate the regulation of B cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. However, the simultaneous detection of signaling proteins or TFs with membrane markers (MMs) can be challenging, as the required fixation and permeabilization procedures can affect the functionality of conjugated antibodies. Here, a phosphoflow method is presented for the detection of activated NF-κB p65 and phosphorylated STAT1, STAT3, STAT5 and STAT6, together with the B cell differentiation MMs CD19, CD27 and CD38. Additionally, a TF-flow method is presented that allows the detection of the B cell TFs PAX5, c-MYC, BCL6 and AID and antibody-secreting cell (ASC) TFs BLIMP1 and XBP-1s, together with MMs. Applying these methods on in vitro-induced human B cell differentiation cultures showed significantly different steady-state levels, and responses to stimulation, of phosphorylated signaling proteins in CD27-expressing B cell and ASC populations. The TF-flow protocol and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) analysis revealed heterogeneity in TF expression within stimulated CD27- or CD38-expressing B cell subsets. The methods presented here allow for the sensitive analysis of STAT, NF-κB p65 signaling and TFs, together with B cell differentiation MMs, at single-cell resolution. This will aid the further investigation of B cell responses in both health and disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Laramée ◽  
Hannah Raczkowski ◽  
Peng Shao ◽  
Carolina Batista ◽  
Devanshi Shukla ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1911-1922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanak Maitra ◽  
Michael Atchison

ABSTRACT PU.1 and BSAP are transcription factors crucial for proper B-cell development. Absence of PU.1 results in loss of B, T, and myeloid cells, while absence of BSAP results in an early block in B-cell differentiation. Both of these proteins bind to the immunoglobulin κ chain 3′ enhancer, which is developmentally regulated during B-cell differentiation. We find here that BSAP can repress 3′ enhancer activity. This repression can occur in plasmacytoma lines or in a non-B-cell line in which the enhancer is activated by addition of the appropriate enhancer binding transcription factors. We show that the transcription factor PU.1 is a target of the BSAP-mediated repression. Although PU.1 and BSAP can physically interact through their respective DNA binding domains, this interaction does not affect DNA binding. When PU.1 function is assayed in isolation on a multimerized PU.1 binding site, BSAP targets a portion of the PU.1 transactivation domain (residues 7 to 30) for repression. The BSAP inhibitory domain (residues 358 to 385) is needed for this repression. Interestingly, the coactivator protein p300 can eliminate this BSAP-mediated repression. We also show that PU.1 can inhibit BSAP transactivation and that this repression requires PU.1 amino acids 7 to 30. Transfection of p300 resulted in only a partial reversal of PU.1-mediated repression of BSAP. When PU.1 function is assayed in the context of the immunoglobulin κ chain 3′ enhancer and associated binding proteins, BSAP represses PU.1 function by a distinct mechanism. This repression does not require the PU.1 transactivation or PEST domains and cannot be reversed by p300 expression. The possible roles of BSAP and PU.1 antagonistic activities in hematopoietic development are discussed.


Author(s):  
Casper Marsman ◽  
Tineke Jorritsma ◽  
Anja ten Brinke ◽  
Marieke van Ham

Flow cytometric detection of intracellular (IC) signaling proteins and transcription factors (TFs) will help elucidate the regulation of B cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. However, simultaneous detection of signaling proteins or TFs, with membrane markers (MM) can be challenging as required fixation and permeabilization procedures can affect functionality of conjugated antibodies. Here, a phosphoflow method is presented for detection of activated NF-κB p65 and phosphorylated STAT1, STAT3, STAT5 and STAT6 together with B cell differentiation MM CD19, CD27 and CD38. Additionally, a TF-flow method is presented that allows detection of B cell TFs; PAX5, c-MYC, BCL6, AID and antibody-secreting cell (ASC) TFs BLIMP1 and XBP-1s together with MM. Applying these methods on in vitro induced human B cell differentiation cultures showed significantly different steady-state levels, and responses to stimulation, of phosphorylated signaling proteins in CD27-expressing B cell and ASC populations. The TF-flow protocol and UMAP analysis revealed heterogeneity in TF-expression within stimulated CD27 or CD38-expressing B cell subsets. The methods presented here allow for sensitive analysis of STAT and NF-κB p65 signaling and TFs together with B cell differentiation MM at single-cell resolution. This will aid further investigation of B cell responses in both health and disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 214 (7) ◽  
pp. 2059-2071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenia Ubieta ◽  
Mireia Garcia ◽  
Bettina Grötsch ◽  
Steffen Uebe ◽  
Georg F. Weber ◽  
...  

The role of AP-1 transcription factors in early B cell development and function is still incompletely characterized. Here we address the role of Fra-2 in B cell differentiation. Deletion of Fra-2 leads to impaired B cell proliferation in the bone marrow. In addition, IL-7–stimulated pro–B cell cultures revealed a reduced differentiation from large pre–B cells to small B cells and immature B cells. Gene profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analyses unraveled a transcriptional reduction of the transcription factors Foxo1, Irf4, Ikaros, and Aiolos in Fra-2–deficient B cells. Moreover, expression of IL7Rα and Rag 1/2, downstream targets of Irf4 and Foxo1, were also reduced in the absence of Fra-2. Pro–B cell proliferation and small pre–B cell differentiation were fully rescued by expression of Foxo1 and Irf4 in Fra-2–deficient pro–B cells. Hence, Fra-2 is a key upstream regulator of Foxo1 and Irf4 expression and influences proliferation and differentiation of B cells at multiple stages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document