Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1542-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Marin Fronza ◽  
Frederick Allen Rueggeberg ◽  
Roberto Ruggiero Braga ◽  
Borys Mogilevych ◽  
Luis Eduardo Silva Soares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monomer Conversion ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Resin Composites

scholarly journals Marginal Adaptation and Micropermeability of Class II Cavities Restored with Three Different Types of Resin Composites—A Comparative Ten-Month In Vitro Study

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1660
Author(s):  
Sevda Mihailova Yantcheva
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Sem Analysis ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Gingival Margin ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Ageing Period

The development of composite materials is subject to the desire to overcome polymerization shrinkage and generated polymerization stress. An indicator characterizing the properties of restorative materials, with specific importance for preventing secondary caries, is the integrity and durability of marginal sealing. It is a reflection of the effects of polymerization shrinkage and generated stress. The present study aimed to evaluate and correlate marginal integrity and micropermeability in second-class cavities restored with three different types of composites, representing different strategies to reduce polymerization shrinkage and stress: nanocomposite, silorane, and bulk-fill composite after a ten-month ageing period. Thirty standardized class ΙΙ cavities were prepared on extracted human molars. Gingival margins were 1 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction. Cavities were randomly divided into three groups, based on the composites used: FiltekUltimate-nanocomposite; Filtek Silorane LS-silorane; SonicFill-bulk-fill composite. All specimens were subjected to thermal cycles after that, dipped in saline for 10-mounds. After ageing, samples were immersed in a 2% methylene blue. Thus prepared, they were covered directly with gold and analyzed on SEM for assessment of marginal seal. When the SEM analysis was completed, the teeth were included into epoxy blocks and cut longitudinally on three slices for each cavity. An assessment of microleakage on stereomicroscope followed. Results were statistically analyzed. For marginal seal evaluation: F.Ultimate and F.Silorane differ statistically with more excellent results than SonicFill for marginal adaptation to the gingival margin, located entirely in the dentin. For microleakage evaluation: F.Ultimate and F.Silorane differ statistically with less microleakage than SonicFill. Based on the results obtained: a strong correlation is found between excellent results for marginal adaptation to the marginal gingival ridge and micropermeability at the direction to the axial wall. We observe a more significant influence of time at the gingival margin of the cavities. There is a significant increase in the presence of marginal fissures (p = 0.001). A significant impact of time (p < 0.000) and of the material (p < 0.000) was found in the analysis of the microleakage.

The Silorane-based Resin Composites: A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. E24-E34 ◽  
Author(s):  
GA Maghaireh ◽  
NA Taha ◽  
H Alzraikat
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Physical And Mechanical Properties ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Tooth Structure

SUMMARY This article aims to review the research done on the silorane-based resin composites (SBRC) regarding polymerization shrinkage and contraction stresses and their ability to improve the shortcomings of the methacrylate-based resin composites (MRBC). Special attention is given to their physical and mechanical properties, bond strength, marginal adaptation, and cusp deflection. The clinical significance of this material is critically appraised with a focus on the ability of SBRC to strengthen the tooth structure as a direct restorative material. A search of English peer-reviewed dental literature (2003-2015) from PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted with the terms “low shrinkage” and “silorane composites.” The list was screened, and 70 articles that were relevant to the objectives of this work were included.

Polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics of resin-composites

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. e57
Author(s):  
H. Al-Sunbul ◽  
N. Silikas ◽  
D.C. Watts
Keyword(s):  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Kinetics Of

Polymerization Shrinkage Stress Kinetics and Related Properties of Bulk-fill Resin Composites

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
HM El-Damanhoury ◽  
JA Platt
Keyword(s):  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Stress Rate ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Microhardness Data ◽  
Knoop Microhardness ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Fill Materials

SUMMARY The present study assessed the polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics of five low-shrinkage light-cured bulk-fill resin composites: Surefil SDR flow (SF, Dentsply), Tetric EvoCeram Bulkfil (TE, Ivoclar Vivadent), Venus Bulk Fill (VB, Heraeus Kulzer), x-tra fil (XF, Voco), and experimental bulk fill (FB, 3M ESPE). Filtek Z250 (FZ, 3M ESPE) was used as a control. Real-time shrinkage stress of investigated composites was measured using a tensometer; maximum shrinkage stress, stress rate (Rmax), and time to reach maximum stress rate (tmax) were recorded. Flexural strength and modulus were measured using a standard procedure, and curing efficiency of 4-mm long specimens was determined using bottom/top percentage Knoop microhardness. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple range tests at a significance level of α=0.05. Results of shrinkage stress, Rmax, and tmax of all bulk-fill materials were significantly lower (p&lt;0.05) than those of the control except for XF. All tested bulk-fill materials were able to achieve acceptable curing efficiency (≥80% bottom/top percentage) at 4-mm depth. In conclusion, this study reports a significant reduction in polymerization shrinkage stress while maintaining comparable curing efficiency at 4 mm for some bulk-fill composites and supports their potential use in posterior clinical situations.

Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations with Different Cavity Liners

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. E210-E220 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Pecie ◽  
I Onisor ◽  
I Krejci ◽  
T Bortolotto
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group D

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to evaluate how cavity linings with different elastic modulus can influence the marginal adaptation (MA) of Class II composite restorations before and after thermo-mechanical loading. Materials and Methods: Forty Class II cavities with margins extending 1 mm below the cement-enamel junction were prepared in extracted human third molars. In each group except the control group, a lining material of 1-mm thickness was applied to the bottom of the cavity and polymerized before placing the resin composite Herculite XRV Ultra (group A: control; group B: Premise Flowable lining; group C: Herculite XRV Ultra lining; and group D: Optibond FL lining). MA was evaluated (with a scanning electron microscope) before and after loading (200,000 loading cycles). Statistical analysis was done using the Shapiro-Wilks test, the analysis of variance test, and Duncan post hoc test at p&lt;0.05. Results: Before loading, the percentages of continuous margins in dentin were superior (p&lt;0.05) for groups C and D (71.1% and 87.2%, respectively) compared to groups A and B (55.7% and 48.3%, respectively). After loading, group D (79.8%) was statistically superior in dentin compared to all of the other groups (43.6%, 35.9%, and 54.4%, respectively). In occlusal enamel, no significant difference was found between groups. The percentage of enamel fractures and the percentage of noncontinuous margins in proximal enamel were high, with no significant difference between liners. It can be concluded that for the materials used in this study, a 1-mm-thick lining with an extremely low elastic modulus (2-3 GPa) could redistribute shrinkage stress. The use of a flowable composite did not significantly improve MA.

A method to investigate the shrinkage stress developed by resin-composites bonded to a single flat surface

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. e27-e34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas V.S. Pabis ◽  
Tathy A. Xavier ◽  
Ecinele F. Rosa ◽  
Flávia P. Rodrigues ◽  
Josete B.C. Meira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flat Surface ◽  
Shrinkage Stress ◽  
Resin Composites
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document