Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town

Desalination ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 204 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ortiz ◽  
R.G. Raluy ◽  
L. Serra
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 14823-14834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Saad ◽  
Nilay Elginoz ◽  
Fatos Germirli Babuna ◽  
Gulen Iskender

2016 ◽  
Vol 507 ◽  
pp. 165-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan W. Holloway ◽  
Leslie Miller-Robbie ◽  
Mehul Patel ◽  
Jennifer R. Stokes ◽  
Junko Munakata-Marr ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 1804-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga Stasiulaitiene ◽  
Dainius Martuzevicius ◽  
Vytautas Abromaitis ◽  
Martynas Tichonovas ◽  
Jonas Baltrusaitis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 424-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elorri Igos ◽  
Alice Dalle ◽  
Ligia Tiruta-Barna ◽  
Enrico Benetto ◽  
Isabelle Baudin ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Takeshita ◽  
Hooman Farzaneh ◽  
Mehrnoosh Dashti

In this paper, a comprehensive life-cycle assessment (LCA) is carried out in order to evaluate the multiple environmental-health impacts of the biological wastewater treatment of the fish-processing industry throughout its life cycle. To this aim, the life-cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling (LIME) was considered as the main LCA model. The proposed methodology is based on an endpoint modeling framework that uses the conjoint analysis to calculate damage factors for human health, social assets, biodiversity, and primary production, based on Indonesia’s local data inventory. A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is integrated with the LIME modeling framework to evaluate the damage on human health caused by five major biological treatment technologies, including chemical-enhanced primary clarification (CEPC), aerobic-activated sludge (AS), up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB), ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO) in this industry. Finally, a life-cycle costing (LCC) is carried out, considering all the costs incurred during the lifetime. The LCA results revealed that air pollution and gaseous emissions from electricity consumption have the most significant environmental impacts in all scenarios and all categories. The combined utilization of the UF and RO technologies in the secondary and tertiary treatment processes reduces the health damage caused by microbial diseases, which contributes significantly to reducing overall environmental damage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document