scholarly journals What have we learnt about CO2 leakage from CO2 release field experiments, and what are the gaps for the future?

2020 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 102939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Roberts ◽  
Linda Stalker
Eos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleya Kaushik ◽  
Jake Graham ◽  
Kalyn Dorheim ◽  
Ryan Kramer ◽  
Jonathan Wang ◽  
...  

Surface and space-based observations, field experiments, and models all contribute to our evolving understanding of the ways that Earth’s many systems absorb and release carbon.


1949 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Taylor

Two examples are given of field trials for which randomized blocks would seem the most suitable design, but in which special considerations of the future of the trial or the nature of the treatments make complete randomization impossible or impracticable. A type of design which takes account of these difficulties is described, together with the appropriate methods of analysis.The author wishes to thank Mr S. C. Pearce for much valuable advice throughout this investigation.


1937 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Culpin

An account is given of methods which have been employed in laboratory and field studies of the actions of rolls on the soil. These studies have revealed little that is remarkable or unexpected concerning the actions of rolls on the soil, but they have clearly demonstrated that the exact actions of rolls differ widely according to the circumstances in which they are employed. When rolling is carried out in field experiments, it is necessary to perform tests to measure the exact effects produced on the soil. In this way it should gradually become more apparent when and how rolling is likely to be beneficial.Of the methods which have been described, the last two, viz. tests of the consolidation, moisture content and tilth by means of a sampling tube, and of the mechanical resistance to the penetration of a probe with the automatic “resistance” recorder, are well adapted to use in field experiments. These methods are being used in many field experiments involving cultivations, and it is hoped that it may at some time in the future be possible by such methods to relate cultivations and crop yields through a knowledge of the soil structure.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Blackshaw ◽  
K. Neil Harker ◽  
George W. Clayton ◽  
John T. O'Donovan

Field experiments were conducted at three locations in 2003 and 2004 to examine clethodim and quizalofop-P efficacy on spring wheat seedlings when applied alone or in tank mixtures with herbicides used to control broadleaf weeds. Clethodim at the recommended rate of 30 g/ha reduced spring wheat biomass by 63 to 98% and was only >90% in three of six site years. In contrast, quizalofop-P at the recommended rate of 36 g/ha reduced wheat biomass >90% in all cases. Clethodim or quizalofop-P could be tank mixed with 2,4-D ester, bromoxynil, or bromoxynil plus MCPA ester with little risk of reduced efficacy on wheat. However, 2,4-D amine was highly antagonistic to both herbicides. The commercial mixture of thifensulfuron plus tribenuron reduced clethodim, but not quizalofop-P, efficacy on wheat. Herbicide options exist for simultaneous control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant canola and glyphosate-resistant wheat if the latter technology were to be commercialized in the future.


2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Levitt ◽  
John A. List

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document