Race and ethnicity in educational intervention research: A systematic review and recommendations for sampling, reporting, and analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 100356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa M. Gaias ◽  
Mylien T. Duong ◽  
Michael D. Pullmann ◽  
Stephanie K. Brewer ◽  
Michelle Smilansky ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hazavehei ◽  
Khadije Ezzati Rastegar ◽  
Mitra Dogonchi ◽  
Nooshin Salimi ◽  
Elham Gheisvandi

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112110386
Author(s):  
Violeta J. Rodriguez ◽  
Dominique L. La Barrie ◽  
Miriam C. Zegarac ◽  
Anne Shaffer

The limited inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities in the development and validation of parenting measures limits our understanding of whether parenting constructs are valid in racial and ethnic minorities. Tests of measurement invariance/equivalence (MI/E) of parenting measures can help evaluate the validity of parenting constructs among racial/ethnic minorities. This systematic review summarized studies on MI/E of parenting constructs by race/ethnicity and evaluated the strength of the evidence. A literature search was conducted using various databases and references to retrieve studies from the United States. Indeed, 10 studies were identified that tested for MI/E of eight parenting scales by race/ethnicity. Only one scale showed moderate evidence of MI/E, five showed weak evidence of MI/E, and two showed no evidence of MI/E. Most studies (80%) used factor analytic methods to test for MI/E, but only two studies (20%) examined all levels of invariance. These findings show that differences exist in how racial/ethnic minorities perceive parenting constructs. Further research is needed to develop more inclusive parenting measures, to protect against the ways in which biased measures may pathologize or misrepresent parenting practices among racial/ethnic minorities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-117
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hazavehei ◽  
Sahar Khoshravesh ◽  
Zahra Taheri-Kharameh

Background One of the most common problems that the elderly with chronic diseases, especially diabetes, faces is lack or poor medical adherence. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of interventions in increasing medical adherence in the elderly with type 2 diabetes. Methods The databases of Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and web of science were searched until April 2017 free from time and language limitation. In review, only randomized controlled trial (RCT) design studies were investigated. The studies of interest were evaluated from three perspectives: educational intervention with or without theories/models of health education and promotion, educational intervention (individual or group education), and noneducational intervention to increase medical adherence. The qualification of RCTs was evaluated through Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. Results Finally, five studies were considered in this systematic review. Educational interventions were used in all of the studies, and in three of these studies, noneducational interventions such as support group, psychiatric consultation, and phone consultation were implemented along with educational intervention. In all studies, medical adherence in the intervention group increased when compared with the control group or basic conditions ( p < .05). All RCTs had high risk of bias. Conclusion This review provides evidence which must be considered in the elderly with diabetes a combination of the educational and noneducational methods to increase medical adherence. It is necessary to conduct studies with higher quality to assess the efficacy of interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document