Sodium levels on admission are associated with mortality risk in hospitalized patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Akirov ◽  
Talia Diker-Cohen ◽  
Tali Steinmetz ◽  
Oren Amitai ◽  
Ilan Shimon
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (12) ◽  
pp. 1465.e11-1465.e19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Akirov ◽  
Hiba Masri-Iraqi ◽  
Alaa Atamna ◽  
Ilan Shimon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márlon Juliano Romero Aliberti ◽  
Claudia Szlejf ◽  
Claudia Kimie Suemoto ◽  
Murilo Bacchini Dias ◽  
Wilson Jacob-Filho ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between frailty and death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: Prospective cohort study with patients ≥ 50 years hospitalized with COVID-19. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale and the frailty index. Patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥ 5 were considered frail. The primary endpoints were mortality at 30 and 100 days after hospital admission. We used Cox proportional hazard models to investigate the association between frailty and mortality. We also explored whether frailty predicted different mortality levels among patients within strata of similar age and acute disease severity (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score). RESULTS: A total of 1,830 patients were included (mean age 66 years; 58% men; 27% frail according to Clinical Frailty Scale score). The mortality risk at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.7; 95% CI 1.4 - 2.1; p <0.001) and 100 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.7; 95% CI 1.4 - 2.1; p <0.001) was almost double for frail patients. The Clinical Frailty Scale also predicted different mortality levels among patients within strata of similar age and acute disease severity. Frailty intensified the effect of acute disease severity on the risk of death (p for interaction = 0.01). Of note, the Clinical Frailty Scale achieved outstanding accuracy to identify frailty according to the frailty index (area under the ROC curve = 0.94; 95% CI 0.93 - 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Our results encourage the use of the Clinical Frailty Scale in association with measures of acute disease severity to determine prognosis and promote adequate resource allocation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-807.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocio Laguna-Goya ◽  
Alberto Utrero-Rico ◽  
Paloma Talayero ◽  
Maria Lasa-Lazaro ◽  
Angel Ramirez-Fernandez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sztaniszlav ◽  
A Magnuson ◽  
I L Bryngelsson ◽  
N Edvardsson ◽  
K Sztaniszlav ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrythmia. Both its incidence and prevalence increased significantly during the last decades. AF is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Purpose The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the trends of all-cause mortality in patients first-ever hospitalized for AF, and the effect of age, sex, stroke risk, and education level on mortality over time. Methods In this observational retrospective cohort study, we enrolled the patients who were hospitalized primarily and for the first time because of AF between 1st January 1995 and 31st December 2004. In regard to the date of the index admission patients were divided into four cohorts and they were followed up to five years. Patients were compared with an age and sex matched control population. All data were collected from Swedish national registries. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression with trend analysis were used for statistical evaluation. Results In total 64 489 AF patients (mean age 72±10.1 year) were included in this study. The control group comprised 116 893 individuals. 81.9% of the women and 58.5% of the men were older than 65 years of age. 65.5% of women and 58.5% of the men had a stroke risk of CHADS2-VA2Sc ≥2. We found a significantly decreasing trend of the relative risk for all-cause mortality in AF patients over time: trend HR: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96, p&lt;0.001) in women and trend HR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89–0.93 p&lt;0.001) in men. The mortality trends between AF patients and their controls did not show significant difference: trend HR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96–1.02, p=0.59) in women and trend HR: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97–1.03, p=0.98) in men. The subpopulation analysis showed that the mortality risk remained unchanged over the time in women aged 18–69 years (trend HR: 0.91 – 95% CI: 0.82–1.02, p=0.099), in patients with low stroke risk (trend HR: 1.08 – 95% CI: 0.92–1.26, p=0.36 in women and trend HR: 0.95 – 95% CI: 0.87–1.05, p=0.30 in men) and in patients with post-secondary level of education (trend HR: 0.93 – 95% CI 0.83–1.04, p=0.23 in women and trend HR: 1.04 – 95% CI: 0.96–1.12, p=0.32 in men). Conclusion The all-cause mortality risk of the AF hospitalized patients was higher compared to control population and had a decreasing tendency during the time of the study. However, this trend is not significantly different from the control population. We found unchanged mortality trend in younger patients, in those with lower stroke risk, and in patients with higher education level. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Endocrine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Akirov ◽  
Alexander Gorshtein ◽  
Ilana Shraga-Slutzky ◽  
Ilan Shimon

Author(s):  
Ming-Shun Hsieh ◽  
Kung-Chuan Cheng ◽  
Meng-Lun Hsieh ◽  
Jen-Huai Chiang ◽  
Vivian Chia-Rong Hsieh

Here we aimed to assess the mortality risk and distribution of deaths from different complications and etiologies for non-alcoholic liver cirrhosis (NALC) adult inpatients and compare them with that of the general hospitalized adult population. Hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of NALC and aged between 30 and 80 years of age from 1999 to 2010 were identified using a population-based administrative claims database in Taiwan. They were matched with a general, non-NALC population of hospitalized patients. Causes of death considered were variceal hemorrhage, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, jaundice, and hepatorenal syndrome. A total of 109,128 NALC inpatients were included and then matched with 109,128 inpatients without NALC. Overall mortality rates were 21.2 (95% CI: 21.0–21.4) and 6.27 (95% CI: 6.17–6.37) per 100 person-years, respectively. Among complications that caused death in NALC patients, variceal hemorrhage was the most common (23.7%, 11.9 per 100 person-years), followed by ascites (20.9%, 10.4 per 100 person-years) and encephalopathy (18.4%, 9.21 per 100 person-years). Among all etiologies, mortality rates were highest for NALC patients with HBV infection (43.7%, 21.8 per 100 person-years), followed by HBV-HCV coinfection (41.8%, 20.9 per 100 person-years), HCV infection (41.2%, 20.6 per 100 person-years), and NAFLD (35.9%, 17.9 per 100 person-years). In this study, we demonstrated that mortality risks in NALC patients may differ with their etiology and their subsequent complications. Patients’ care plans, thus, should be formulated accordingly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 3140-3149
Author(s):  
Jingwen Li ◽  
Hu Luo ◽  
Gang Deng ◽  
Jinying Chang ◽  
Xiaoming Qiu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibault Fiolet ◽  
Anthony Guihur ◽  
Mathieu Rebeaud ◽  
Matthieu Mulot ◽  
Yahya Mahamat-Saleh

AbstractBackgroundGlobal COVID-19 deaths reached at least 400,000 fatalities. Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial drug that elicit immunomodulatory effects and had shown in vitro antiviral effects against SRAS-CoV-2. This drug divided opinion worldwide in the medical community but also in the press, the general public and in public health policies. The aim of this systematic review and this meta-analysis was to bring a new overview on this controversial drug and to assess whether hydroxychloroquine could reduce COVID-19 mortality risk in hospitalized patients.Methods and FindingsPubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MedRxiv and grey literature were searched until 10 June 2020. Only studies of COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (with or without azithromycin) compared with a comparative standard care group and with full-text articles in English were included. Studies reporting effect sizes as Odds Ratios, Hazard Ratio and Relative Risk for mortality risk and the number of deaths per groups were included. This meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42020190801). Independent extraction has been performed by two independent reviewers. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model.The initial search leaded to 112 articles, from which 16 articles met our inclusion criteria. 15 studies were retained for association between hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 survival including 15,081 patients (8,072 patients in the hydroxychloroquine arm and 7,009 patients in the standard care arm with respectively, 1,578 deaths and 1,423 deaths). 6 studies were retained for hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin. Hydroxychloroquine was not significantly associated with mortality risk (pooled Relative Risk RR=0.82 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.62-1.07, I2=82, Pheterogeneity<0.01, n=15)) within hospitalized patients, nor in association with azithromycin (pooled Relative Risk RR=1.33 (95% CI: 0.92-1.92, I2=75%, Pheterogeneity<0.01, n=6)), nor in the numerous subgroup analysis by study design, median age population, published studies (vs unpublished articles), level of bias risk. However, stratified analysis by continents, we found a significant decreased risk of mortality associated with hydroxychlroquine alone but not with azithromycin among European (RR= 0.62 (95%CI: 0.41-0.93, n=7)) and Asian studies (RR=0.36 (95%CI:0.18-0.73, n=1)), with heterogeneity detected across continent (Pheterogeneity between=0.003). These finding should be interpreted with caution since several included studies had a low quality of evidence with a small sample size, a lack of adjustment on potential confounders or selection and intervention biases.ConclusionOur meta-analysis does not support the use of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin to reduce COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients. It raises the question of the hydroxychloroquine use outside of clinical trial. Additional results from larger randomised controlled trials are needed


2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 2230-2241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Akirov ◽  
Talia Diker-Cohen ◽  
Hiba Masri-Iraqi ◽  
Ilan Shimon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document