Comment to: Non-specific clinical presentations are not prognostic and do not anticipate hospital length of stay or resource utilization: Author's reply

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Conway ◽  
Bernard Silke
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Presentations

Enterocutaneous Fistula Complicating Trauma Laparotomy: A Major Resource Burden

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro G.R. Teixeira ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Joseph Dubose ◽  
Ali Salim ◽  
Carlos Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Enterocutaneous Fistula ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Hollow Viscus

Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) is an uncommon and poorly studied postoperative complication. The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence and resource utilization of patients who developed an ECF after trauma laparotomy. All patients with an ECF occurring after trauma laparotomy at a Level I trauma center were identified through a review of both the Trauma Registry and the Morbidity and Mortality reports for a 9-year period ending in December 2006. Each ECF case was matched with a control (non-ECF) that did not develop this complication after laparotomy. The matching criteria were: age, gender, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score, and damage control laparotomy requiring an open abdomen. Outcomes analyzed were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, mortality, and total hospital charges. During the 9-year period, of 2373 acute trauma laparotomies performed, 36 (1.5%) patients developed an enterocutaneous fistula, and were matched to 36 controls. Patients with an ECF were 31 ± 12 years of age, were 97 per cent male, had a mean Injury Severity Score of 21 ± 10, and 75 per cent were penetrating. Eighty-nine per cent of the ECF patients had a hollow viscus injury. The most common was colon (69%), followed by small bowel (53%), duodenum (36%), and stomach (19%). Fifty-six per cent of the ECF patients had multiple hollow viscus injuries. The development of an ECF was associated with significantly increased ICU length of stay (28.5 ± 30.5 vs 7.6 ± 9.3 days, P = 0.004), hospital length of stay (82.1 ± 100.8 vs 16.2 ± 17.3 days, P < 0.001), and hospital charges ($539,309 vs $126,996, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the development of an enterocutaneous fistula after laparotomy for trauma resulted in a significant impact on resource utilization including longer ICU and hospital length of stay and higher hospital charges. Further investigation into the prevention and treatment of this costly complication is warranted.

scholarly journals Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abid D Khan ◽  
Anna J Elseth ◽  
Jacqueline A Brosius ◽  
Eliza Moskowitz ◽  
Sean C Liebscher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Head Ct ◽  
The Brain

BackgroundThe Brain Injury Guidelines provide an algorithm fortreating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) that does not mandate hospital admission, repeat head CT, orneurosurgical consult for all patients. The purposes of this study are toreview the guidelines’ safety, to assess resource utilization, and to proposeguideline modifications that improve patient safety and widespreadreproducibility.MethodsA multi-institutional review of TBI patients was conducted. Patients with ICH on CT were classified as BIG 1, 2, or 3 based on the guidelines. BIG 3 patients were excluded. Variables collected included demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, number of head CTs, type of injury, progression of injury, and neurosurgical interventions performed.Results269 patients met inclusion criteria. 98 were classifiedas BIG 1 and 171 as BIG 2. The median length of stay (LOS) was 2 (2,4)days and the ICU LOS was 1 (0,2) days. Most patients had a neurosurgeryconsultation (95.9%) and all patients included had a repeat head CT. 370repeat head CT scans were performed, representing 1.38 repeat scans perpatient. 11.2% of BIG 1 and 11.1% of BIG 2 patients demonstratedworsening on repeat head CT. Patients who progressed exhibited a higherISS (14 vs. 10, p=0.040), and had a longer length of stay (4 vs. 2 days;p=0.015). After adjusting for other variables, the presence of epiduralhematoma (EDH) and intraparenchymal hematoma were independent predictors ofprogression. Two BIG 2 patients with EDH had clinical deteriorationrequiring intervention.DiscussionThe Brain Injury Guidelines may improve resourceallocation if utilized, but alterations are required to ensure patientsafety. The modified Brain Injury Guidelines refine the originalguidelines to enhance reproducibility and patient safety while continuing toprovide improved resource utilization in TBI management.

152. Pain plan implementation decreases postoperative opioid use, hospital length of stay and clinic resource utilization for patients undergoing elective spine surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S76
Author(s):  
Harjot Uppal ◽  
Sydney Rozenfeld ◽  
Kristin Hesselbach ◽  
Trisha Ludwig ◽  
Miranda Bice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Plan Implementation

scholarly journals Emergency medical admissions and COVID-19: impact on 30-day mortality and hospital length of stay

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Conway ◽  
Declan G. Byrne ◽  
Deirdre M. R. O’Riordan ◽  
Brian D. Kent ◽  
Barry M. J. Kennedy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Multiple Variable ◽  
Univariate Predictor

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has put considerable strain on healthcare systems. Aim To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on 30-day in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS) and resource utilization in acute medical care. Methods We compared emergency medical admissions to a single secondary care centre during 2020 to the preceding 18 years (2002–2019). We investigated 30-day in-hospital mortality with a multiple variable logistic regression model. Utilization of procedures/services was related to LOS with zero truncated Poisson regression. Results There were 132,715 admissions in 67,185 patients over the 19-year study. There was a linear reduction in 30-day in-hospital mortality over time; over the most recent 5 years (2016–2020), there was a relative risk reduction of 36%, from 7.9 to 4.3% with a number needed to treat of 27.7. Emergency medical admissions increased 18.8% to 10,452 in 2020 with COVID-19 admissions representing 3.5%. 18.6% of COVID-19 cases required ICU admission with a median stay of 10.1 days (IQR 3.8, 16.0). COVID-19 was a significant univariate predictor of 30-day in-hospital mortality, 18.5% (95%CI: 13.9, 23.1) vs. 3.0% (95%CI: 2.7, 3.4)—OR 7.3 (95%CI: 5.3, 10.1). ICU admission was the dominant outcome predictor—OR 12.4 (95%CI: 7.7, 20.1). COVID-19 mortality in the last third of 2020 improved—OR 0.64 (95%CI: 0.47, 0.86). Hospital LOS and resource utilization were increased. Conclusion A diagnosis of COVID-19 was associated with significantly increased mortality and LOS but represented only 3.5% of admissions and did not attenuate the established temporal decline in overall in-hospital mortality.

scholarly journals 182. Missed Opportunities to Discontinue Unnecessary Vancomycin During Pharmacist Therapeutic Monitoring

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S98
Author(s):  
Corey J Medler ◽  
Mary Whitney ◽  
Juan Galvan-Cruz ◽  
Ron Kendall ◽  
Rachel Kenney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Therapeutic Monitoring ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Missed Opportunities

Abstract Background Unnecessary and prolonged IV vancomycin exposure increases risk of adverse drug events, notably nephrotoxicity, which may result in prolonged hospital length of stay. The purpose of this study is to identify areas of improvement in antimicrobial stewardship for vancomycin appropriateness by clinical pharmacists at the time of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods Retrospective, observational cohort study at an academic medical center and a community hospital. Inclusion: patient over 18 years, received at least three days of IV vancomycin where the clinical pharmacy TDM service assessed for appropriate continuation for hospital admission between June 19, 2019 and June 30, 2019. Exclusion: vancomycin prophylaxis or administered by routes other than IV. Primary outcome was to determine the frequency and clinical components of inappropriate vancomycin continuation at the time of TDM. Inappropriate vancomycin continuation was defined as cultures positive for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant bacteria, and non-purulent skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) in the absence of vasopressors. Data was reported using descriptive statistics and measures of central tendency. Results 167 patients met inclusion criteria with 38.3% from the ICU. SSTIs were most common indication 39 (23.4%) cases, followed by pneumonia and blood with 34 (20.4%) cases each. At time of vancomycin TDM assessment, vancomycin continuation was appropriate 59.3% of the time. Mean of 4.22 ± 2.69 days of appropriate vancomycin use, 2.18 ± 2.47 days of inappropriate use, and total duration 5.42 ± 2.94. 16.4% patients developed an AKI. Majority of missed opportunities were attributed to non-purulent SSTI (28.2%) and missed MRSA nares swabs in 21% pneumonia cases (table 1). Conclusion Vancomycin is used extensively for empiric treatment of presumed infections. Appropriate de-escalation of vancomycin therapy is important to decrease the incidence of adverse effects, decreasing hospital length of stay, and reduce development of resistance. According to the mean duration of inappropriate therapy, there are opportunities for pharmacy and antibiotic stewardship involvement at the time of TDM to optimize patient care (table 1). Missed opportunities for vancomycin de-escalation Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Association of Emergency Department Waiting Times With Patient Experience in Admitted and Discharged Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110114
Author(s):  
Andrew Nyce ◽  
Snehal Gandhi ◽  
Brian Freeze ◽  
Joshua Bosire ◽  
Terry Ricca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Short Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient’S Experience ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
The Impact

Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse patient experience in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). However, it is unclear which component of the waiting times is most impactful to the patient experience and the impact on hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients between July 2018 and March 30, 2020. In all, 3278 patients were included: 1477 patients were discharged from the ED, and 1680 were admitted. Discharged patients had a longer door-to-first provider and door-to-doctor time, but a shorter doctor-to-disposition, disposition-to-departure, and total ED time when compared to admitted patients. Some, but not all, components of waiting times were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal experience (<100th percentile). Prolonged door-to-doctor time was significantly associated with worse patient experience in discharged patients and in patients with hospital length of stay ≤4 days. Prolonged ED waiting times were significantly associated with worse patient experience in patients who were discharged from the ED and in inpatients with short length of stay. Door-to-doctor time seems to have the highest impact on the patient’s experience of these 2 groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document