The impact of specialist care for low back pain on health service utilization in primary care patients: A prospective cohort study

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Chenot ◽  
Corinna Leonhardt ◽  
Stefan Keller ◽  
Martin Scherer ◽  
Norbert Donner-Banzhoff ◽  
...  
Pain Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1394-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Elder ◽  
Niki Munk ◽  
Margaret M. Love ◽  
Geza G. Bruckner ◽  
Kathryn E. Stewart ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. Providing inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during weekends. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in a prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of weekday of admission and distress on LoS of inpatients with LBP. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. In part 1, a negative binomial model was fitted to LoS with weekday of admission as a predictor. In part 2, the same model included weekday of admission, distress level, and their interaction as covariates. Planned contrast was used in part 1 to estimate the difference in log-expected LoS between group 1 (admissions Friday/Saturday) and the reference group (admissions Sunday-Thursday). In part 2, the same contrast was used to estimate the corresponding difference in (per-unit) distress trends. Results We identified 173 patients with LBP. The mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD = 5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS = 10.3) and Saturday (LoS = 10.6) had longer stays, but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS = 7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect and planned contrast showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with a significant increase in LoS (log ratio = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.63). A total of 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress were available from 86 patients (49%). According to the negative binomial model for LoS and the planned contrast, the distress effect on LoS was significantly influenced (difference in slopes = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.60) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday). Conclusions Delays in interdisciplinary LBP management over the weekend may prolong LoS. This may particularly affect patients reporting high levels of distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0131963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lonneke van Hoeven ◽  
Yvonne Vergouwe ◽  
P. D. M. de Buck ◽  
Jolanda J. Luime ◽  
Johanna M. W. Hazes ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 2101-2112
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Rodondi ◽  
Anne-Sylvie Bill ◽  
Nadia Danon ◽  
Julie Dubois ◽  
Jérôme Pasquier ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Fong-Ling Loy ◽  
Su-Yin Yang ◽  
Jamila Chemat ◽  
Soon-Yin Tjan

Background: Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder that can incur high financial burden. A significant proportion of this burden may be incurred from referrals to health services and subsequent healthcare usages. Patients’ overall experience of pain and its related life interferences may also have some relevance to this usage. Objective: This study aimed to examine the referral practices and subsequent health service utilization of patients with LBP within a tertiary specialist clinic setting. A secondary objective was to explore potential associations between primary independent variables of pain and life interferences with health service utilization. Methods: Participants were patients with low back pain, who completed a set of self-reported low back pain measures. These included measures for pain intensity, pain interference, disability and quality of life. The participants’ back pain-related referral and health service utilization in the subsequent 12 months were recorded. Results: A total of 282 patients completed the full measures. Of these, 59.9% were referred for physiotherapy, 26.3% for diagnostic imaging and 9.2% for interventional procedures. Compared to patients who were referred from tertiary care, those from primary care had lower pain intensity ([Formula: see text]), pain interference ([Formula: see text]), disability ([Formula: see text]), but better physical and mental quality of life ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). High pain interference was a common factor among patients who were referred on to other services after first consultation. Levels of medical utilization and physiotherapy utilization were both associated with pain intensity ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] vs [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), pain interference ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] vs [Formula: see text], 0.01) and disability ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] vs [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). Regression analysis showed that the source of referral contributed to 6% of the variance in medical utilization and 3% of the variance in physiotherapy utilization. After controlling the demographic variables and referral sources, none of the independent variables added any significant variance to medical utilization. Only pain intensity contributed an additional 2% variance to physiotherapy utilization. Conclusion: Referral patterns and practices appear similar to those reported in other studies. Higher levels of pain intensity, interference, disability and quality of life appear to influence the referral to different health services and subsequent treatment utilization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. A63-A64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf E. Mehling ◽  
Cynthia J. Price ◽  
Jennifer Daubenmier ◽  
Acree Mike ◽  
Elizabeth Bartmess ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lonneke van Hoeven ◽  
Jolanda Luime ◽  
Huub Han ◽  
Yvonne Vergouwe ◽  
Angelique Weel

Author(s):  
Michael Von Korff

This chapter argues that psychological states, in particular fear and depression, are potentially remediable causes of social role disability among primary care patients. Using chronic low back pain as an example, it considers how recognising and treating depression can improve disability and quality of life for primary care patients with this and many other chronic conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1234-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien I. T. de Schepper ◽  
Bart W. Koes ◽  
Edwin H. G. Oei ◽  
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra ◽  
Pim A. J. Luijsterburg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document