Early psychological reactions in parents of children with a life threatening illness within a pediatric hospital setting

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Muscara ◽  
M.C. McCarthy ◽  
C. Woolf ◽  
S.J.C. Hearps ◽  
K. Burke ◽  
...  

AbstractResearch in contextParents of children with life threatening illness or injuries are at elevated risk of distress reactions, involving symptoms of acute stress disorder, depression and anxiety. Currently, the impact of child illness factors is unclear, and to date research systematically examining the prevalence of these psychological reactions across different illness groups with an acute life threat is sparse. This is important to explore given that studies show that parent functioning impacts on the psychological adjustment and recovery of the ill child.What does this study add?At four weeks following a child's diagnosis of a serious illness, 49–54% of parents met DSM-IV criteria for acute stress disorder, across a number of illness groups, whereas 15–27% of parents were in the moderate/severe range for depression and anxiety, and 25–31% for stress. Results from this study demonstrate that rates and severity of these psychological reactions in parents of seriously ill children do not vary according to illness type.BackgroundA life threatening childhood illness/injury can lead to significant distress reactions in parents, with independent studies finding such reactions in several different illness groups. To date, there is limited research systematically comparing the prevalence of adverse parental psychological reactions across different childhood illness groups with an acute life threat. This study aimed to investigate the frequency and severity of symptoms of acute traumatic stress, depression, anxiety and general stress in parents, following admission of their child to hospital for a life threatening illness. The study also aimed to explore the relationship between these symptoms, and to determine whether they differ according to illness/injury.MethodsCross-sectional data from a prospective, longitudinal study are reported. Participants were 194 parents of 145 children (49 couples), admitted to cardiology (n = 53), oncology (n = 40) and pediatric intensive care units (n = 52), for serious illnesses/injuries. Parents completed self-report questionnaires within four weeks of hospital admission.ResultsRates of acute traumatic stress (P = 0.262), depression (P = 0.525), anxiety (P = 0.453) and general stress symptoms (P = 0.720) in parents were comparable across illness type, with 49–54% reaching criteria for acute stress disorder, 15–27% having clinical levels of depression and anxiety, and 25–31% for general stress. Anxiety was most strongly associated with acute traumatic stress (r = 0.56), closely followed by stress (r = 0.52) and depression (r = 0.49), with all correlations highly significant (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThese findings provide evidence that the child's medical condition is not associated with parents’ experience of clinically significant psychological symptoms, and emphasize the importance for health care providers to be aware of these potential psychological reactions in parents, regardless of the type of illness.

Author(s):  
Richard A. Bryant

Acute stress disorder (ASD) was introduced as a new diagnosis in 1994 in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. This diagnosis has led to much new research into the nature of acute psychological reactions to trauma, as well as considerable developments in how acute traumatic stress is assessed and treated. This chapter reviews the current diagnostic criteria, the nature of trajectories of traumatic stress responses, known mechanisms of ASD, and prevailing assessment and treatment procedures. This review highlights that the predictive utility of the ASD diagnosis has been challenged by longitudinal research, which has led to marked changes in the definition and goals of the diagnosis in DSM-5. Despite the problems associated with initial conceptualizations of the ASD diagnosis, its introduction has led to novel early intervention strategies for trauma survivors.


2007 ◽  
Vol 187 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Forbes ◽  
Mark C Creamer ◽  
Andrea J Phelps ◽  
Anne‐Laure Couineau ◽  
John A Cooper ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (09) ◽  
pp. 779-782
Author(s):  
T. Bronisch

ZusammenfassungKatastrophenpsychiatrie meint die psychiatrisch-psychologische Betreuung von Opfern, deren Angehörigen und den Helfern im Rahmen von Naturkatastrophen und durch Menschen verursachte Katastrophen (Krieg oder Terroranschlag). Diese Betreuung basiert auf dem Diagnose- und Behandlungskonzept der Posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung – Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) und der Akuten Stress Reaktion – Acute Stress Disorder (ASD). Während die PTSD eine gut validierte und mit effektiven Behandlungskonzepten ausgestattete Diagnose ist, fehlen diese Voraussetzungen bisher bei der ASD. Konsequenzen für das Konzept der Katastrophenpsychiatrie, Therapie und Prävention von Betroffenen und Helfern werden dargelegt.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond Heir ◽  
Tore Bonsaksen ◽  
Tine Grimholt ◽  
Øivind Ekeberg ◽  
Laila Skogstad ◽  
...  

Background It has been suggested that countries with more resources and better healthcare have populations with a higher risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Norway is a high-income country with good public healthcare. Aims To examine lifetime trauma exposure and the point prevalence of PTSD in the general Norwegian population. Method A survey was administered to a national probability sample of 5500 adults (aged ≥18 years). Of 4961 eligible individuals, 1792 responded (36%). Responders and non-responders did not differ significantly in age, gender or urban versus rural residence. Trauma exposure was measured using the Life Events Checklist for the DSM-5. PTSD was measured with the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5. We used the DSM-5 diagnostic guidelines to categorise participants as fulfilling the PTSD symptom criteria or not. Results At least one serious lifetime event was reported by 85% of men and 86% of women. The most common event categories were transportation accident and life-threatening illness or injury. The point prevalence of PTSD was 3.8% for men and 8.5% for women. The most common events causing PTSD were sexual and physical assaults, life-threatening illness or injury, and sudden violent deaths. Risk of PTSD increased proportionally with the number of event categories experienced. Conclusions High estimates of serious life events and correspondingly high rates of PTSD in the Norwegian population support the paradox that countries with more resources and better healthcare have higher risk of PTSD. Possible explanations are high expectations for a risk-free life and high attention to potential harmful mental health effects of serious life events. Declaration of interest None.


2020 ◽  
pp. 6506-6509
Author(s):  
Jonathan I. Bisson

Acute stress disorder, adjustment disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder are all psychiatric consequences of traumatic experiences. Because trauma is so common in medical practice, in the form of accidents, severe illness, and sometimes medical and surgical treatments, these disorders are commonly seen by physicians. An initial severe reaction to a traumatic event such as severe accident is an acute stress disorder and is commonly characterized by dissociation. A more long-lasting emotional reaction to ongoing stress such as a new diagnosis of life-threatening illness is termed an adjustment disorder. An often longer-lasting and more severe psychological reaction associated with repeated mental re-experiencing of the traumatic event is called post-traumatic stress disorder. These trauma-related disorders are not only an important cause of suffering but may also complicate medical care, hence they require recognition and appropriate treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document