ORA47 is a transcriptional regulator of a general stress response hub

Transcriptional regulators of general stress response (GSR) reprogram expression of selected genes to transduce informational signals into cellular events, ultimately manifested in plant's ability to cope with environmental challenges. Identification of the core GSR regulatory proteins will uncover the principal modules and their mode of action in the establishment of adaptive responses. To define the GSR regulatory components, we employed a yeast-one-hybrid assay to identify the protein(s) that binds to the previously established functional GSR motif, coined Rapid Stress Response Element (RSRE). This led to the isolation of ORA47 (octadecanoid-responsive AP2/ERF-domain transcription factor 47), a Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) inducible protein. Subsequently, the ORA47 transcriptional activity was confirmed using RSRE-driven Luciferase (LUC) activity assay performed in the ORA47 loss- and gain-of-function lines introgressed into the 4xRSRE::Luc background. In addition, the prime contribution of CALMODULIN-BINDING TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATOR3 (CAMTA3) protein in induction of RSRE was reaffirmed by genetic studies. Moreover, exogenous application of MeJA led to enhanced levels of ORA47 and CAMTA3 transcripts, and the induction of RSRE::LUC activity. Metabolic analyses illustrated the reciprocal functional inputs of ORA47 and CAMTA3 in increasing JA levels. Lastly, transient assays identified JASMONATE ZIM-domain1 (JAZ1) as a repressor of RSRE::LUC activity.

Acid stress signals are integrated into the σB-dependent general stress response pathway via the stressosome in the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes

The general stress response (GSR) in Listeria monocytogenes plays a critical role in the survival of this pathogen in the host gastrointestinal tract. The GSR is regulated by the alternative sigma factor B (σB), whose role in protection against acid stress is well established. However, the mechanisms leading to its activation by low pH are unknown. Here, we investigated the involvement of the stressosome, a sensory organelle, in transducing low pH signals to induce the GSR. Mild acid shock (15 min at pH 5.0) activated σB and conferred protection against a subsequent lethal pH challenge. A mutant strain where the stressosome subunit RsbR1 was present but its remaining paralogues were genetically inactivated retained the ability to induce σB activity at pH 5.0. The role of stressosome phosphorylation in signal transduction was investigated by mutating the putative phosphorylation sites in the core stressosome proteins RsbR1 (rsbR1 T175A, T209A, T241A) and RsbS (rsbS S56A), or in the active site of the stressosome kinase RsbT (rsbT N49A). The rsbS S56A and rsbT N49A mutations abolished the response to low pH. The rsbR1 T175A variant, retained a near-wild type phenotype. The rsbR1 T209A and rsbR1 T241A mutants displayed constitutive σB activity. Mild acid shock upregulates invasion genes and stimulates epithelial cell invasion, effects that were abolished in mutants with an inactive or overactive stressosome. Overall, the results show that the stressosome is required for acid-induced activation of σB in L. monocytogenes. Furthermore, RsbR1 can function independently of its paralogues and that signal transduction requires RsbT-mediated phosphorylation of RsbS on S56 and RsbR1 on T209. These insights shed light on the mechanisms of signal transduction that activate the GSR in L. monocytogenes in response to acidic environments, and highlight the role this sensory process in the early stages of the infectious cycle.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak on the Performance of Sign Language Interpreters

In general, stress affects the efficiency of workers’ performance. With the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic outbreak, sign language interpreters experience increased stress due to various factors. This study aims to determine the stressors faced by sign language interpreters during the pandemic. To achieve this goal, we prepared a questionnaire consisting of 15 paragraphs covering psychological, health, cognitive, linguistic and environmental aspects. Then, we surveyed 57 sign language interpreters in the Arab region. In the analysis, we calculated the average performance levels in addition to the differences between participants’ average scores. We also divided the stress levels into three categories: simple, moderate and severe. Results indicated that the stress was medium on average and no statistically significant differences in the performance average in accordance with the study variables (gender, experience and workplace).

The Association Between Stress and Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study Among 186 First-Year Contemporary Dance Students

The demanding environment that contemporary dance students are exposed to could result in high stress levels, which can influence injury susceptibility. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between stress and injuries. In the period between September 2016 and March 2020, four cohorts of first-year dance students (N = 186; mean age 19.21 ± 1.35 years) were followed for one academic year. Each month, general stress was assessed on a 0–100 visual analogous scale. The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Questionnaire on Health Problems was used on a monthly basis to monitor injuries. Injuries were defined as “all injuries” (i.e., any physical complaint irrespective of the need for medical attention or time-loss from dance) and “substantial injuries” (i.e., leading to moderate/severe/complete reductions in training volume or performance). Mann–Whitney tests were performed to measure differences in general stress levels between injured and injury-free students, while repeated-measures ANOVA were performed to investigate whether general stress scores increased before and during injury occurrence. The overall average monthly general stress score over all cohorts for all students was 39.81. The monthly general stress scores ranged from 31.75 to 49.16. Overall, injured and substantially injured students reported higher stress scores than injury-free students, with significant differences in 3 out of the 9 months for all injuries (September, October, March, p < 0.05), and in 5 months for substantial injuries (September, October, November, December, April, p < 0.05). Within the 3-month period before and during injury occurrence, a (marginally) significant linear effect of general stress across the time periods was found for all injuries [F(1.87,216.49) = 3.10, p = 0.051] and substantial injuries [F(2,138) = 4.16, p = 0.018]. The results indicate an association between general stress and injuries. Future research should focus on effects of varying stress levels on injury risk using higher sampling frequency, for instance by measuring weekly since stress levels are likely to fluctuate daily. Practically, strategies aiming at stress reduction might have the potential to reduce the burden of dance injuries and may have positive outcomes for dancers, teachers, schools, and companies.

The functional differences between paralogous regulators define the control of the General Stress Response in Sphingopyxis granuli TFA

Sphingopyxis granuli TFA is a contaminant degrading alphaproteobacterium that responds to adverse conditions by inducing the General Stress Response (GSR), an adaptive response that controls the transcription of a variety of genes to overcome adverse conditions. The GSR triggered by TFA is driven by two extracytoplasmic function σ factors (ECFs), EcfG1 and EcfG2, whose functional differences have been addressed previously, being EcfG2 the main activator. Upstream in this cascade, NepR anti-s factors directly inhibit EcfG activity under non-stress conditions, whereas PhyR response regulators sequester the NepR elements upon stress sensing to relieve EcfG inhibition. These elements, which are essential mediators of the GSR regulation, are duplicated in TFA, being NepR1 and NepR2, and PhyR1 and PhyR2. Here, based on multiple genetic, phenotypical and biochemical evidences including in vitro transcription assays, we have assigned distinct functional features to each of these paralogs and assessed their contribution to the GSR regulation, dictating its timing and the intensity. We show that different stress signals are differentially integrated into the GSR by PhyR1 and PhyR2, therefore producing different levels of GSR activation. We demonstrate in vitro that both NepR1 and NepR2 bind EcfG1 and EcfG2, although NepR1 produces a more stable interaction than NepR2. Conversely, NepR2 interacts with phosphorylated PhyR1 and PhyR2 more efficiently than NepR1. We propose an integrative model where NepR2 would play a dual negative role: it would directly inhibit the s factors upon activation of the GSR and it would modulate the GSR activity indirectly by titrating the PhyR regulators.

In harm’s way, but not stressed about it: On the antecedents and consequences of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories

Conspiracy theories proliferate during times of turmoil. Not surprisingly, the COVID-19 pandemic has created an environment in which virus-related conspiracy theories have thrived. The current study leverages prior research to shed light on the antecedents and consequences of conspiracy theory beliefs in the important, real-world context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we found that suffering greater negative economic consequences due to the pandemic predicted greater belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and this relation was strongest among those generally inclined to believe conspiracy theories. We then examined the consequences of coming to hold such beliefs. Greater endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories predicted less social distancing behavior, greater minimization of the threat of COVID-19, and lower levels of general stress. These findings replicate and extend prior research showing a link between conspiracy theory beliefs and rejection of scientific advice, but also offer evidence pointing to a psychological benefit of believing conspiracy theories.

General and specific stress mindsets: Links with college student health and academic performance

The goal of this cross-sectional, correlational study was to evaluate (a) whether beliefs about stress as enhancing versus debilitating (i.e., stress mindsets) vary across sources of stress that differ in duration (acute vs. chronic) and controllability, and (b) how general and source-specific stress mindsets relate to health and academic performance. College students (n = 498) self-reported their general and source-specific stress mindsets, perceived distress, health, coping, and GPA. Stress mindsets varied as a function of duration and controllability, and general stress mindsets were only weakly associated with source-specific mindsets. Consistent with previous research, general stress mindsets were associated with health, but some source-specific mindsets were more predictive of health than others—viewing stress from chronic controllable sources as debilitating was most predictive of poor mental and physical health. Measures of stress were also associated with health, and this association was moderated by stress mindsets, suggesting that viewing stress as enhancing can provide a psychological “buffer” against the negative effects of stress. Approach coping and perceived distress were examined as potential mediators of the links between stress mindset and health. Viewing stress as enhancing was related to greater use of approach coping and lower perceived distress, which in turn was related to better health. This research suggests that stress mindset interventions may benefit students’ health, and that interventions targeting mindsets for chronic controllable sources of stress may be more effective than general stress mindset interventions.