Re: Role of Genetic Testing for Inherited Prostate Cancer Risk: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Antonio Alcaraz ◽  
Lourdes Mengual
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 847-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence Shaneyfelt ◽  
Rozita Husein ◽  
Glenn Bubley ◽  
Christos S. Mantzoros

PURPOSE: Although there is strong circumstantial evidence that androgens are implicated in the etiology of prostate cancer, epidemiologic investigations have failed to demonstrate consistently that one or more steroid hormones are implicated. In contrast, recent epidemiologic studies unequivocally link serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels with risk for prostate cancer. METHODS: We have performed the first meta-analysis of all previously published studies on hormonal predictors of risk for prostate cancer. RESULTS: A meta-analysis restricted to studies that performed mutual adjustment for all measured serum hormones, age, and body mass index indicated that men whose total testosterone is in the highest quartile are 2.34 times more likely to develop prostate cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.30 to 4.20). In contrast, levels of dihydrotestosterone and estradiol do not seem to play a role of equal importance. The only study that provides multivariably adjusted sex hormone–binding globulin data indicates that this binding protein is inversely related to prostate cancer risk (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.89). Finally, all three studies that examined the role of serum IGF-1 have consistently demonstrated a positive and significant association with prostate cancer risk that is similar in magnitude to that of testosterone. CONCLUSION: Men with either serum testosterone or IGF-1 levels in upper quartile of the population distribution have an approximately two-fold higher risk for developing prostate cancer.


2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Nakazato ◽  
K Suzuki ◽  
H Matsui ◽  
N Ohtake ◽  
S Nakata ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Doukas ◽  
MD Fetters ◽  
JC Coyne ◽  
LB McCullough

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeel Kaiser ◽  
Christopher Haskins ◽  
Mohummad M. Siddiqui ◽  
Arif Hussain ◽  
Christopher D’Adamo

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 321-321
Author(s):  
Elisa Ledet ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Colin Pritchard ◽  
William B. Isaacs ◽  
A. Oliver Sartor

321 Background: The BLM gene encodes a RecQ DNA helicase that is involved in homologous recombination. Biallelic BLM inactivation leads to Bloom syndrome, an inherited genetic disorder marked by chromosomal instability and multiple cancer susceptibilities. Conflicting studies have suggested that heterozygous BLM mutation carriers may have an increased risk of various cancers. Here we explored the role of germline pathogenic BLM mutations in prostate cancer. Methods: Prostate cancer patients with heterozygous BLM mutations were assembled from Tulane Cancer Center (TCC), Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and University of Washington (UW). BLM germline mutations were identified either through commercial germline testing (Invitae), the UW-BROCA panel, or whole-exome sequencing. Corresponding tumor tissue was analyzed by DNA sequencing for somatic alterations. Population level control data were obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Results: 6 BLM germline carriers were identified among 985 advanced prostate cancer case; 2/295 TCC patients, 2/172 JHH patients, and 2/518 UW patients. Overall, pathogenic BLM mutations were detected in 0.609% (6/985) of prostate cancer cases. All mutations were loss-of-function truncating lesions (splicing or nonsense alterations). No Ashkenazi BLM mutations were observed. The population frequency of pathogenic or likely pathogenic BLM alterations detected in gnomAD was 0.025% (31/124,589). Compared to gnomAD controls, the relative risk of BLM mutations in prostate cancer patients was 24.3 (95% CI 10.2 to 58.2; P < 0.0001). One family had a pathogenic splice variant in BLM that cosegregated with disease in three of three cases with lethal/high risk prostate cancer. Tumor DNA sequencing was possible in 5 of 6 BLM carriers; no case demonstrated LOH or additional somatic BLM mutations. Interestingly, 2/5 cases on tumor sequencing also had bi-allelic BRCA2 inactivation. Conclusions: Germline BLM mutations may play a role in prostate cancer risk. Given the role of BLM in chromosomal stability and evidence of concurrent BRCA2 inactivation in a subset of cases, larger cohorts and functional analyses will be critical for better understanding the role of BLM in prostate cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document