Beware the hallucal interphalangeal joint sesamoid in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. e18-e22 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Wong-Chung ◽  
Matthew Arneill ◽  
Richard Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Rate of Development of Hallucal Interphalangeal Degenerative Joint Disease After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-362
Author(s):  
Nisha N. Shah ◽  
Marcus P. Richardson ◽  
Anson K. Chu ◽  
Christopher F. Hyer
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Degenerative Joint Disease ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Radiographic Analysis ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Rate Of Development ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

The development of hallux interphalangeal joint (IPJ) arthritis after an arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint has been established in the literature. However, the significance has not been well reported. A retrospective, radiographic review of patients who had undergone a first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis was performed. The Coughlin classification for degree of arthritic degeneration, hallux abductus angle, and hallux interphalangeus angle were measured in 107 radiographs of 103 patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative angles were measured immediately following surgery at approximately 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. We found that the hallux abductus angle had decreased in the patients postoperatively; however, the hallux abductus interphalangeus angle increased on average after first metatarsophalangeal fusion. The majority of patients started with a Coughlin classification I of the hallux IPJ, which remained unchanged over the postoperative period, with no statistically significant difference in IPJ degeneration in the patients with or without fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. In addition, no patients had a symptomatic hallux IPJ postoperatively within our limited study period. Further prospective studies would be beneficial with longer follow-up times to assess IPJ degeneration following first metatarsophalangeal joint fusions. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective, comparative study

Hallux Interphalangeal Joint Range of Motion in Feet with and Without Limited First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Dorsiflexion

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro V. Munuera ◽  
Piedad Trujillo ◽  
Israel Güiza
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Regression Equation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Limitus ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Range ◽  
Strong Inverse Correlation

Background: This work was designed to assess the degree of correlation between hallux interphalangeal joint and first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and to compare the mobility of the hallux interphalangeal joint between participants with and without limited first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion (hallux limitus). Methods: Dorsiflexion of the hallux interphalangeal joint was measured in 60 normal feet and in 60 feet with hallux limitus to find correlations with first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion with the Spearman correlation coefficient and a simple linear regression equation. In addition, movement of the hallux interphalangeal joint was compared between normal and hallux limitus feet with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Significant differences were found between the groups in mean ± SD interphalangeal joint dorsiflexion (control group: 1.17° ± 2.50° ; hallux limitus group: 10.65° ± 8.24° ; P < .001). A significant inverse correlation was found between first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and hallux interphalangeal joint dorsiflexion (ρ = −0.766, P < .001), and the regression equation from which predictions could be made is the following: hallux interphalangeal joint dorsiflexion = 27.17 − 0.381 × first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion. Conclusions: Hallux interphalangeal joint dorsiflexion was greater in feet with hallux limitus than in normal feet. There was a strong inverse correlation between first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion and hallux interphalangeal joint dorsiflexion. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(1): 47–53, 2012)

Functional motion of the medial column joints of the foot during propulsion

1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 474-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
RD Phillips ◽  
EA Law ◽  
ED Ward
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Plane Motion ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
First Ray ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joints

Motion in the ankle, subtalar, midtarsal, and first metatarsophalangeal joints has been well documented. However, motion in the first metatarsocuneiform, the first cuneonavicular, and the first interphalangeal joint has not been addressed. Motion in these joints has not been documented because many believe that little motion occurs at these joints, and because of the difficulty in assessing motion at these joints. Using two-dimensional motion analysis, the authors present sagittal plane ranges of motion occurring in the first metatarsophalangeal joint, the first metatarsocuneiform joint, the medial cuneonavicular joint, and the first interphalangeal joint during the propulsive period of gait. This pilot study indicates that sagittal plane motion between the navicular and calcaneus and between the first metatarsal and first cuneiform are very mild and inconsistent. However, plantarflexion motion between the first cuneiform and the navicular is significant and comprises most of the plantarflexion motion of the first ray during propulsion. Motion in the first interphalangeal joint is slight during the first 80% of the propulsive period but shows slight-to-moderate dorsiflexion during the last 20% of the propulsive period of gait.

Correlation analysis of the x-ray and functional parameters from the results of chevron (Austin) osteotomy for hallux valgus

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-63
Author(s):  
Ruslan Khairutdinov ◽  
Timur Minasov ◽  
Ekaterina Yakupova ◽  
Elvina Mukhametzyanova
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Valgus Deformity ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Chevron Osteotomy ◽  
Hallux Valgus Deformity ◽  
Valgus Angle ◽  
The Right ◽  
Bone Structures

Hallux valgus is characterized by the appearance and growth of a painful “lump” in the region of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, the development of forefoot corns, and inability to choose the right shoes, which leads to a significant decrease in the quality of life of these patients. Corrective osteotomies that preserve the metatarsophalangeal joint, for example Austin (Chevron) osteotomy, are usually used for hallux valgus deformity of the I, II degrees. Radiography with the study of the hallux valgus angle (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) is a research method that shows the true correlation between bone structures. The correlation between the radiological and functional indicators of osteotomy allows us to determine possible recommendations for indications for surgical treatment of Hallux valgus. Correlation shows that the largest correction of hallux valgus in older patients occurs due to a small adjustment of the angle of DMMA and HVA. IMA had the best correction after Austin osteotomy among patients of a younger age, then the HVA, and the DMMA had minimum correction according to the AOFAS rating scale (Kitaoka). The revealed correlations allow us to determine the correct tactics for the treatment of hallux valgus by identifying the benefits of Austin osteotomy.

scholarly journals Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus and Impact of Arthrodesis versus Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Monique Chambers ◽  
MaCalus Hogan ◽  
Dukens LaBaze
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
End Stage

Category: Bunion, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Severe, end-stage hallux rigidus can become debilitating with surgical intervention becoming necessary once conservative measures and shoe modifications have failed. Joint salvage procedures include metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis and MTP arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in patient reported outcomes in two cohorts who underwent fusion or joint reconstruction. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 385 patients from an academic medical institution. Patients who underwent surgical intervention from July 2015 to November 2016 were identified based on CPT codes for MTP arthrodesis (28750) and arthroplasty (28293). We extracted outcome scores including SF12-M, SF12-P, FAAM, and VAS scores. Exclusion criteria included poly-trauma, revision procedures, and lack of pre and post-operative outcome scores. Mann- Whitney t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0b for Mac to compare procedure groups, with significance define by a p-value of 0.05. Results: A total of eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6 who underwent arthroplasty and 12 arthrodesis. The average age was 63.7 amongst the cohort, with a total of 16 female and 2 males. Patients who underwent arthrodesis had better outcomes across all parameters. When comparing preoperative and postoperative scores, arthrodesis patients showed greater improvement of SF12-M (arthrodesis 9 vs arthroplasty -2, p=0.05), and SF12-P (9 vs -16, respectively p=0.05) scores. Arthroplasty patients were more likely to have a decrease in their SF-12 scores. VAS scores and FAAM scores showed no statistical difference between the two cohorts. Postoperative VAS scores were worse in 33% of arthroplasty patients despite surgical intervention, compared to 10% of arthrodesis patients. Conclusion: Our results suggests that both procedures provide a statistically significant difference in pain with several patients having a Global Rate of Change that is “very much better”. However, fusion of the metatarsophalangeal joint results in improved pain and functional outcomes for patients with severe hallux rigidus. These findings are consistent with current reports in the literature, which are mostly case series reports. Larger studies are needed to provide appropriate power and better support the findings of this study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document