scholarly journals Type of frozen transfer in relation to euploid miscarriage outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. e31
Author(s):  
Ange Wang ◽  
Lynn M. Westphal
Keyword(s):  
Frozen Transfer

FT-MDnet: A Deep-Frozen Transfer Learning Framework for Person Search

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Ronghua Hu ◽  
Tian Wang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Hichem Snoussi ◽  
Abel Cherouat
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Learning ◽  
Learning Framework ◽  
Person Search ◽  
Frozen Transfer

scholarly journals What can patients expect in their first frozen transfer after failed day 5 eSET?

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e174 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Liebermann ◽  
J. Mathews ◽  
A. Diamond ◽  
M.L. Uhler ◽  
R. Brohammer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Frozen Transfer

scholarly journals EAST ASIAN WOMEN EXPERIENCE LOWER RATES OF LIVE BIRTH THAN CAUCASIAN WOMEN AFTER SINGLE FRESH BLASTOCYST TRANSFER BUT HAVE SIMILAR OUTCOMES AFTER FROZEN TRANSFER

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e292-e293
Author(s):  
Anne E. Martini ◽  
Samantha Kodama ◽  
Tommy Na ◽  
Samad Jahandideh ◽  
Micah J. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Asian Women ◽  
Caucasian Women ◽  
Frozen Transfer

Transfer of two versus three embryos in women less than 40 years old undergoing frozen transfer cycles

2010 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna Berin ◽  
Lawrence L. Engmann ◽  
Claudio A. Benadiva ◽  
David W. Schmidt ◽  
John C. Nulsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Frozen Transfer

scholarly journals The late vanishing of a co-twin contributes to adverse perinatal outcomes in the surviving singleton

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1553-1561
Author(s):  
Jinliang Zhu ◽  
Zhongwei Wang ◽  
Lixue Chen ◽  
Ping Liu
Keyword(s):  
Perinatal Mortality ◽  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Adverse Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies ◽  
Fresh Transfer ◽  
Frozen Transfer

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is the vanishing of a co-twin after or before the ultrasonic registration of cardiac activity at approximately 6–8 weeks of gestation associated with adverse perinatal outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER The timing of the demise of a co-twin after the registration of cardiac activity is an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A significant body of evidence has confirmed that vanishing twin (VT) pregnancies are associated with higher levels of risk for preterm birth (PTB), low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA) and perinatal mortality, compared with singleton pregnancy. However, the impact of co-twin vanishing, before or after the presence, of cardiac activity, on perinatal outcomes has yet to be extensively investigated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 38 876 singletons delivered from ART cycles between 2006 and 2018, at the Peking University Third Hospital. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In total, 35 188 singletons were delivered from the singleton pregnancy group, 2256 singletons from the VT pregnancy group after that cardiac activity was noted, and 1432 singletons were delivered from the VT pregnancy group before cardiac activity could be registered. Using the Poisson model, the adjusted risk ratio (aRR) was used to estimate the incidence of PTB, LBW, SGA and perinatal mortality, in the pregnancies of two types of VT compared with singleton pregnancies after correction for potential confounding factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The vanishing of a co-twin after the registration of cardiac activity was associated with an increased risk of perinatal mortality when compared with the group of singleton pregnancies (0.5% vs 0.2%; P = 0.006); this association still existed after adjustment for potential confounders (aRR 2.19, 95% CI 1.12–4.30; P = 0.023). Furthermore, it was significantly associated with a higher risk of PTB (all cycles aRR 2.00, 95% CI 1.77–2.24; P < 0.001; fresh transfer aRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.78–2.38; P < 0.001; frozen transfer aRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.52–2.28; P < 0.001), LBW (all cycles aRR 2.47, 95% CI 2.12–2.88; P < 0.001; fresh transfer aRR 2.50, 95% CI 2.07–3.02; P < 0.001; frozen transfer aRR 2.39; 95% CI 1.83–3.12; P < 0.001) and SGA (all cycles aRR 1.56, 95% CI 1.35–1.80; P < 0.001; fresh transfer aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.29–1.81; P < 0.001; frozen transfer aRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24–2.11; P < 0.001). However, prior to the presence of cardiac activity, the vanishing of a co-twin was not associated with a higher risk of perinatal mortality (all cycles aRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.17–2.92; P = 0.636; fresh cycles aRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.07–3.70; P = 0.502; frozen cycles aRR 1.29, 95% CI 0.17–9.66; P = 0.803), PTB (all cycles aRR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91–1.34; P = 0.301; fresh cycles aRR 1.10, 95% CI 0.87–1.39; P = 0.447; frozen cycles aRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.81–1.58; P = 0.467), LBW (all cycles aRR 1.19, 95% CI 0.91–1.55; P = 0.207; fresh cycles aRR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77–1.51; P = 0.668; frozen cycles aRR 1.45, 95% CI 0.93–2.25; P = 0.100) and SGA (all cycles aRR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89–1.35; P = 0.405; fresh cycles aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.75–1.26; P = 0.839). Pregnancies involving the two types of VT were significantly different in terms of PTB (all cycles aRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.45–2.24; P < 0.001; fresh cycles aRR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44–2.45; P < 0.001; frozen cycles aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13–2.40; P = 0.009), LBW (all cycles aRR 2.08, 95% CI 1.55–2.79; P < 0.001; fresh cycles aRR 2.32, 95% CI 1.61–3.36; P < 0.001; frozen cycles aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.01–2.70; P = 0.046) and SGA (all cycles aRR 1.70, 95% CI 1.36–2.11; P < 0.001; fresh cycles aRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.42–2.45; P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The present data are not able to differentiate between co-twin demise occurring in the first or second trimester. Because the second trimester ultrasound scan is not an integral aspect of IVF assessment, this information was not available in the database. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Adverse perinatal outcomes in ART babies can be avoided by replacing one embryo at a time. It is possible to apply selective single embryo transfer strategy for all while maintaining acceptable success rates. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (Reference number: 31801251). No competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER not applicable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document