OCCURRENCE OF SECONDARY FINDINGS DURING UNIVERSAL CARRIER SCREENING FOR EGG DONOR CANDIDATES

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e269-e270
Author(s):  
Amber Gamma ◽  
Mary Rausch ◽  
Jeanette Tomasino ◽  
Marie Marella ◽  
Marianne Farkas
Author(s):  
Antonio Capalbo ◽  
Maurizio Poli ◽  
Antoni Riera-Escamilla ◽  
Vallari Shukla ◽  
Miya Kudo Høffding ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Our genetic code is now readable, writable and hackable. The recent escalation of genome-wide sequencing (GS) applications in population diagnostics will not only enable the assessment of risks of transmitting well-defined monogenic disorders at preconceptional stages (i.e. carrier screening), but also facilitate identification of multifactorial genetic predispositions to sub-lethal pathologies, including those affecting reproductive fitness. Through GS, the acquisition and curation of reproductive-related findings will warrant the expansion of genetic assessment to new areas of genomic prediction of reproductive phenotypes, pharmacogenomics and molecular embryology, further boosting our knowledge and therapeutic tools for treating infertility and improving women’s health. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE In this article, we review current knowledge and potential development of preconception genome analysis aimed at detecting reproductive and individual health risks (recessive genetic disease and medically actionable secondary findings) as well as anticipating specific reproductive outcomes, particularly in the context of IVF. The extension of reproductive genetic risk assessment to the general population and IVF couples will lead to the identification of couples who carry recessive mutations, as well as sub-lethal conditions prior to conception. This approach will provide increased reproductive autonomy to couples, particularly in those cases where preimplantation genetic testing is an available option to avoid the transmission of undesirable conditions. In addition, GS on prospective infertility patients will enable genome-wide association studies specific for infertility phenotypes such as predisposition to premature ovarian failure, increased risk of aneuploidies, complete oocyte immaturity or blastocyst development failure, thus empowering the development of true reproductive precision medicine. SEARCH METHODS Searches of the literature on PubMed Central included combinations of the following MeSH terms: human, genetics, genomics, variants, male, female, fertility, next generation sequencing, genome exome sequencing, expanded carrier screening, secondary findings, pharmacogenomics, controlled ovarian stimulation, preconception, genetics, genome-wide association studies, GWAS. OUTCOMES Through PubMed Central queries, we identified a total of 1409 articles. The full list of articles was assessed for date of publication, limiting the search to studies published within the last 15 years (2004 onwards due to escalating research output of next-generation sequencing studies from that date). The remaining articles’ titles were assessed for pertinence to the topic, leaving a total of 644 articles. The use of preconception GS has the potential to identify inheritable genetic conditions concealed in the genome of around 4% of couples looking to conceive. Genomic information during reproductive age will also be useful to anticipate late-onset medically actionable conditions with strong genetic background in around 2–4% of all individuals. Genetic variants correlated with differential response to pharmaceutical treatment in IVF, and clear genotype–phenotype associations are found for aberrant sperm types, oocyte maturation, fertilization or pre- and post-implantation embryonic development. All currently known capabilities of GS at the preconception stage are reviewed along with persisting and forthcoming barriers for the implementation of precise reproductive medicine. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The expansion of sequencing analysis to additional monogenic and polygenic traits may enable the development of cost-effective preconception tests capable of identifying underlying genetic causes of infertility, which have been defined as ‘unexplained’ until now, thus leading to the development of a true personalized genomic medicine framework in reproductive health.


2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. e14-e15
Author(s):  
A. Quinteiro Retamar ◽  
C.M. Borghi ◽  
G. Fiszbajn ◽  
S. Papier ◽  
S. Munne ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e237
Author(s):  
Pere Mir Pardo ◽  
Joaquin Panadero ◽  
Gema Escribano ◽  
Jorge Jimenez-Almazán ◽  
Roberto Alonso ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
GREG FEERO
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lea Godino ◽  
Liliana Varesco ◽  
William Bruno ◽  
Carla Bruzzone ◽  
Linda Battistuzzi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Swanson ◽  
Teresa N. Sparks ◽  
Billie R. Lianoglou ◽  
Flavia Chen ◽  
Sarah Downum ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ivy van Dijke ◽  
Phillis Lakeman ◽  
Naoual Sabiri ◽  
Hanna Rusticus ◽  
Cecile P. E. Ottenheim ◽  
...  

AbstractPreconception carrier screening offers couples the possibility to receive information about the risk of having a child with a recessive disorder. Since 2016, an expanded carrier screening (ECS) test for 50 severe autosomal recessive disorders has been available at Amsterdam Medical Center, a Dutch university hospital. This mixed-methods study evaluated the experiences of couples that participated in the carrier screening offer, including high-risk participants, as well as participants with a general population risk. All participants received genetic counselling, and pre- (n = 132) and post-test (n = 86) questionnaires and semi-structured interviews (n = 16) were administered. The most important reason to have ECS was to spare a future child a life with a severe disorder (47%). The majority of survey respondents made an informed decision (86%), as assessed by the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Among the 86 respondents, 27 individual carriers and no new carrier couples were identified. Turn-around time of the test results was considered too long and costs were perceived as too high. Overall, mean levels of anxiety were not clinically elevated. High-risk respondents (n = 89) and pregnant respondents (n = 13) experienced higher levels of anxiety before testing, which decreased after receiving the test result. Although not clinically significant, distress was on average higher for carriers compared to non-carriers (p < 0.0001). All respondents would opt for the test again, and 80.2% would recommend it to others. The results suggest that ECS should ideally be offered before pregnancy, to minimise anxiety. This study could inform current and future implementation initiatives of preconception ECS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document