A reduced PM index for evaluating the effect of fuel properties on the particulate matter emissions from gasoline vehicles

Fuel ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 253 ◽  
pp. 691-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taoyang Wu ◽  
Anren Yao ◽  
Jun Feng ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Zhuangzhuang Li ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 4191-4199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrell B. Sonntag ◽  
Chad R. Bailey ◽  
Carl R. Fulper ◽  
Richard W. Baldauf

2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1414-1428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Robert ◽  
Saskia VanBergen ◽  
Michael J. Kleeman ◽  
Christopher A. Jakober

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbin Zhang ◽  
Xiao Ma ◽  
Lu Xinhui ◽  
Shijin Shuai ◽  
Kaihua Wu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Noah R. Bock ◽  
William F. Northrop

Abstract The influence of fuel properties on particulate matter (PM) emissions from a catalytic gasoline particulate filter (GPF) equipped gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine were investigated using novel “virtual drivetrain” software and an engine mated to an engine dynamometer. The virtual drivetrain software was developed to operate the engine on an engine dynamometer as if it were in a vehicle undergoing a driving cycle. The software uses a physics-based approach to determine vehicle acceleration and speed based on engine load and a programed “shift” schedule to control engine speed. The first 200 seconds of the WLTP driving cycle was tested using 6 different fuel formulations of varying volatility, aromaticity, and ethanol concentration. It was found that there was a strong correlation between aromaticity of the fuel and the engine-out PM emissions, with the highest emitting fuel producing more than double the mass emissions of the low PM production fuel. However, the post-GPF PM emissions depended greatly on the soot loading state of the GPF. The fuel with the highest engine-out PM emissions produced comparable post-GPF emissions to the lowest PM producing fuel over the driving cycle when the GPF was loaded over three cycles with the respective fuels. These results demonstrate the importance of GPF loading state when aftertreatment systems are used for PM reduction. It also shows that GPF control may be more important than fuel properties, and that regulatory compliance for PM can be achieved with proper GPF control calibration irrespective of fuel type.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document