scholarly journals The test–retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions – A systematic review of the literature

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Ruhe ◽  
René Fejer ◽  
Bruce Walker
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Centre Of Pressure ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Task Conditions ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Tandem Gait Test-Retest Reliability Among Healthy Child and Adolescent Athletes

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1254-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Howell ◽  
Anna N. Brilliant ◽  
William P. Meehan
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Healthy Child ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Adolescent Athletes ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Task Conditions ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Tandem Gait

Context The tandem gait test is a method for assessing dynamic postural control and part of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, versions 3 and 5. However, its reliability among child and adolescent athletes has yet to be established. Objective To examine the test-retest reliability of the single-task and dual-task tandem gait test among healthy child and adolescent athletes. Design Descriptive laboratory study. Setting Sports injury-prevention center. Patients or Other Participants Uninjured and healthy athletes between the ages of 9 and 18 years. Intervention(s) Tandem gait measures repeated 3 times across the period of approximately 1 month. Main Outcome Measure(s) Participants completed the tandem gait test under single-task and dual-task (ie, while simultaneously executing a cognitive task) conditions. Our primary outcome measure was completion time during the single-task and dual-task conditions. We also assessed cognitive accuracy and response rate while participants completed the dual-task tandem gait test. Results Thirty-two child and adolescent athletes completed the study (mean age = 14.3 ± 2.4 years; females = 16). Single-task tandem gait times were similar across the 3 testing sessions (14.4 ± 4.8, 13.5 ± 4.2, and 13.8 ± 4.8 seconds; P = .45). Dual-task tandem gait times steadily improved across the test timeline (18.6 ± 6.9, 16.6 ± 4.5, and 15.8 ± 4.7 seconds; P = .02). Bivariate correlations indicated moderately high to high agreement from test 1 to test 2 (single-task r = .627; dual-task r = 0.655) and from test 2 to test 3 (single-task r = 0.852; dual-task r = 0.775). Both the single-task (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC [3,1] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73, 0.93) and dual-task (ICC [3,1] = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.69, 0.92) conditions demonstrated high reliability across testing sessions. Conclusions Tandem gait outcome measures demonstrated high test-retest reliability in both the single- and dual-task conditions. The overall reliability was within the acceptable range for clinical practice, but improvements across tests suggested a moderate practice effect. Tandem gait represents a reliable, dynamic, postural-control test that requires minimal space, cost, and time.

scholarly journals Strength Assessment Under Dual Task Conditions in Women with Fibromyalgia: A Test–Retest Reliability Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (24) ◽  
pp. 4971
Author(s):  
Juan Luis Leon-Llamas ◽  
Santos Villafaina ◽  
Alvaro Murillo-Garcia ◽  
Daniel Collado-Mateo ◽  
Francisco Javier Domínguez-Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Chair Stand ◽  
Stand Test ◽  
Performance Variable ◽  
Chair Stand Test ◽  
Total Performance ◽  
Task Conditions ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The present study aimed to: (1) analyze the test–retest reliability of the 30 s chair stand test and the 30 s arm curl test under dual-task conditions; (2) analyze the test–retest reliability of a new variable which assesses the total performance (cognitive + physical) in both tests. A total of 37 women with fibromyalgia participated in the study. Participants completed the 30 s arm curl test and 30 s chair stand test in both simple and dual-task conditions. These tests were repeated after seven days. In the 30 s chair stand dual-task test the reliability was low to good whereas that of the total performance variable was low to moderate. The reliability in both the 30 s arm curl dual-task test and the total performance variable were good to moderate. Both the 30 s chair stand test and 30 s arm curl test under dual-task conditions and the total performance variables had good test–retest reliability. However, it is necessary to consider the fluctuations of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

scholarly journals Test–Retest Reliability of the Yo-Yo Test: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1547-1557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozo Grgic ◽  
Luca Oppici ◽  
Pavle Mikulic ◽  
Jens Bangsbo ◽  
Peter Krustrup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Recommended motor assessments based on psychometric properties in individuals with dementia: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Trautwein ◽  
Philipp Maurus ◽  
Bettina Barisch-Fritz ◽  
Anela Hadzic ◽  
Alexander Woll
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Motor assessments are important to determine effectiveness of physical activity in individuals with dementia (IWD). However, inappropriate and non-standardised assessments without sound psychometric properties have been used. This systematic review aims to examine psychometric properties of motor assessments in IWD combined with frequency of use and effect sizes and to provide recommendations based on observed findings. We performed a two-stage systematic literature search using Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ALOIS, and Scopus (inception - July/September 2018, English and German). The first search purposed to identify motor assessments used in randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of physical activity in IWD and to display their frequency of use and effect sizes. The second search focused on psychometric properties considering influence of severity and aetiology of dementia and cueing on test-retest reliability. Two reviewers independently extracted and analysed findings of eligible studies in a narrative synthesis. Results Literature searches identified 46 randomised controlled trials and 21 psychometric property studies. While insufficient information was available for validity, we observed sufficient inter-rater and relative test-retest reliability but unacceptable absolute test-retest reliability for most assessments. Combining these findings with frequency of use and effect sizes, we recommend Functional Reach Test, Groningen Meander Walking Test (time), Berg Balance Scale, Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, Timed Up & Go Test, instrumented gait analysis (spatiotemporal parameters), Sit-to-Stand assessments (repetitions> 1), and 6-min walk test. It is important to consider that severity and aetiology of dementia and cueing influenced test-retest reliability of some assessments. Conclusion This review establishes an important foundation for future investigations. Sufficient relative reliability supports the conclusiveness of recommended assessments at group level, while unacceptable absolute reliability advices caution in assessing intra-individual changes. Moreover, influences on test-retest reliability suggest tailoring assessments and instructions to IWD and applying cueing only where it is inevitable. Considering heterogeneity of included studies and insufficient examination in various areas, these recommendations are not comprehensive. Further research, especially on validity and influences on test-retest reliability, as well as standardisation and development of tailored assessments for IWD is crucial. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018105399).

scholarly journals Test–retest reliability and responsiveness of centre of pressure measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1357-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Laroche ◽  
A. Kubicki ◽  
P.J. Stapley ◽  
V. Gremeaux ◽  
K. Mazalovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Centre Of Pressure ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Test-Retest Reliability of Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST) in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 510
Author(s):  
Laura Muñoz-Bermejo ◽  
José Carmelo Adsuar ◽  
María Mendoza-Muñoz ◽  
Sabina Barrios-Fernández ◽  
Miguel A. Garcia-Gordillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Balance Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Stand Test ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Functional independence in adults is conditioned by lower limb muscle strength. Thus, it seems important to assess lower limb strength using reliable and easy to reproduce measurements. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to collect studies that examined the test-retest reliability of the Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST) in adults. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, including all studies published up to 28 December 2020. To be included, studies had to include relative reliability scores (ICC) and maximum torque or standard error of measurements (SEM) of FTSST. A total of 693 studies were initially identified, but only 8 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis, covering a total of 14 groups with 400 participants. Relative inter-rater reliability results (ICC = 0.937, p < 0.001, n = 400) revealed excellent reliability of FTSST to assess sitting and standing performance, lower limbs strength and balance control. Conclusion: The Five Times Sit to Stand Test is a highly reliable tool for assessing lower limbs strength, balance control, and mobility in both healthy adults and those with pathologies.

scholarly journals Reliability, and Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Gaming Disorder Scales: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seowon Yoon ◽  
Yeji Yang ◽  
Eunbin Ro ◽  
Woo-Young Ahn ◽  
Jueun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Internet Addiction ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Gaming Disorder ◽  
Reliability Generalization ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: An association between gaming disorder (GD) and the symptoms of common mental disorders is unraveled yet. In this preregistered study, we quantitatively synthesized reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of GD scales to examine association between GD and other constructs.Methods: Five representative GD instruments (GAS-7, AICA, IGDT-10, Lemmens IGD-9, and IGDS9-SF) were chosen based on recommendations by the previous systematic review study to conduct correlation meta-analyses and reliability generalization. A systematic literature search was conducted through Pubmed, Proquest, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify studies that reported information on either reliability or correlation with related variables. 2,124 studies were full-text assessed as of October 2020, and 184 were quantitatively synthesized. Conventional Hedges two-level meta-analytic method was utilized.Results: The result of reliability generalization reported a mean coefficient alpha of 0.86 (95% CI = 0.85–0.87) and a mean test-retest estimate of 0.86 (95% CI = 0.81–0.89). Estimated effect sizes of correlation between GD and the variables were as follows: 0.33 with depression (k = 45; number of effect sizes), 0.29 with anxiety (k = 37), 0.30 with aggression (k = 19), –0.22 with quality of life (k = 18), 0.29 with loneliness (k = 18), 0.56 with internet addiction (k = 20), and 0.40 with game playtime (k = 53), respectively. The result of moderator analyses, funnel and forest plots, and publication bias analyses were also presented.Discussion and Conclusion: All five GD instruments have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Relatively few studies reported the test-retest reliability. The result of correlation meta-analysis revealed that GD scores were only moderately associated with game playtime. Common psychological problems such as depression and anxiety were found to have a slightly smaller association with GD than the gaming behavior. GD scores were strongly correlated with internet addiction. Further studies should adopt a rigorous methodological procedure to unravel the bidirectional relationship between GD and other psychopathologies.Limitations: The current study did not include gray literature. The representativeness of the five tools included in the current study could be questioned. High heterogeneity is another limitation of the study.Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42020219781].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document