scholarly journals Quality of depression treatment in Black Americans with major depression and comorbid medical illness

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amma A. Agyemang ◽  
Briana Mezuk ◽  
Paul Perrin ◽  
Bruce Rybarczyk
2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Druss ◽  
Kimberly Rask ◽  
Wayne J. Katon

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Flávia Barros da Silva Lima ◽  
Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, adequacy of antidepressant treatment, and changes in quality of life of patients with major depression receiving follow-up care from primary care centers. METHOD: A cohort study was performed in which major depression patients were followed-up over a nine-month period. Several evaluation instruments were used, including the World Health Organization Quality of Life and the Quality of Life-Depression, Centers for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression questionnaires. RESULTS: The sample comprised 179 individuals, mostly female (73%), with a mean age of 38 years and mean education of 9 years. At the end of the follow-up period, 42% of the individuals still presented with major depression, 25% had complete symptom remission, and only 9% were properly treated with antidepressants. In relation to quality of life, there were significant differences especially between baseline and after nine months in almost all measures. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that depressive symptoms are poorly recognized and that treatment is often inadequate for patients followed-up in primary care units in the south of Brazil. Most of the patients continued to have symptoms of depression over the nine-month period which were associated with impaired quality of life.


2020 ◽  
pp. appi.ajp.2020.2
Author(s):  
Lara N. Coughlin ◽  
Paul Pfeiffer ◽  
Dara Ganoczy ◽  
Lewei A. Lin

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanford I. Finkel ◽  
Ellen M. Richter ◽  
Cathryn M. Clary

Background. Few randomized, double-blind studies that examine antidepressant treatment in patients 70 years and older are available. To provide additional data on the safety and efficacy of antidepressants in this rapidly growing population segment, a subgroup analysis of a larger sertraline vs. nortriptyline elderly depression treatment study was performed. Methods. Outpatients (N = 76) who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression with a minimum Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) severity score of 18 were randomized to 12 weeks of flexible dose treatment with sertraline (50–150 mg) or nortriptyline (25–100 mg). Results. Both treatments significantly improved depression as measured by the HAM-D and Clinical Global Impression scales. At Weeks 10, 12, and endpoint, sertraline demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in depression severity compared to nortriptyline as measured by improvement on the 24-item HAM-D (mean adjusted change score of 14.8 vs. 7.6, respectively, at Week 12; p = .001). Sixty-five percent of sertraline-treated patients were responders by Week 12 (50% or greater reduction from baseline in 24-item HAM-D score) compared to 26% of nortriptyline-treated patients (p < .05). Sertraline treatment had a significantly more positive effect, when compared to nortriptyline, across almost all associated measures of cognitive function, energy, anxiety, and quality of life and was better tolerated than nortriptyline, with a lower attrition rate/side effect burden. Conclusion. The efficacy advantage of sertraline appeared to be even greater in this subgroup of older patients drawn from a larger treatment study of depression that included elderly individuals over the age of 60.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1289-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Shing Chen ◽  
Ming-Chao Chen ◽  
Frank Huang-Chih Chou ◽  
Feng-Ching Sun ◽  
Pei-Chun Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document