Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective feasibility study

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 808-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Joo Jin ◽  
Seok Jeong ◽  
Don Haeng Lee
2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Davidson ◽  
Sue Skull ◽  
Hanny Calache ◽  
Donna Chesters ◽  
Jane Chalmers

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB382
Author(s):  
João Fernandes ◽  
Gonçalo Alexandrino ◽  
Marta Moreira ◽  
Tarcísio Araújo ◽  
David Horta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Fernandes ◽  
G Alexandrino ◽  
M Moreira ◽  
T Araújo ◽  
D Horta ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. King

In a sample of attenders screened at a London health centre, 13.6% of male and 1.3% of female respondents were drinking at levels considered unsafe by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and yet revealed few indicators to alert the general practitioner in terms of classical alcohol-related disability. Males, the unemployed, and those of Scottish or Irish origin were over-represented in the ‘at risk’ group. A significant proportion viewed their general practitioner as a source of help.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padeliadu Susana ◽  
Georgios D. Sideridis

Abstract This study investigated the discriminant validation of the Test of Reading Performance (TORP), a new scale designed to evaluate the reading performance of elementary-school students. The sample consisted of 181 elementary-school students drawn from public elementary schools in northern Greece using stratified random procedures. The TORP was hypothesized to measure six constructs, namely: “letter knowledge,” “phoneme blending,” “word identification,” “syntax,” “morphology,” and “passage comprehension.” Using standard deviations (SD) from the mean, three groups of students were formed as follows: A group of low achievers in reading (N = 9) including students who scored between -1 and -1.5 SD from the mean of the group. A group of students at risk of reading difficulties (N = 6) including students who scored between -1.5 and -2 SDs below the mean of the group. A group of students at risk of serious reading difficulties (N = 6) including students who scored -2 or more SDs below the mean of the group. The rest of the students (no risk, N = 122) comprised the fourth group. Using discriminant analyses it was evaluated how well the linear combination of the 15 variables that comprised the TORP could discriminate students of different reading ability. Results indicated that correct classification rates for low achievers, those at risk for reading problems, those at risk of serious reading problems, and the no-risk group were 89%, 100%, 83%, and 97%, respectively. Evidence for partial validation of the TORP was provided through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and indices of sensitivity and specificity. It is concluded that the TORP can be ut ilized for the identification of children at risk for low achievement in reading. Analysis of the misclassified cases indicated that increased variability might have been responsible for the existing misclassification. More research is needed to determine the discriminant validation of TORP with samples of children with specific reading disabilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document