scholarly journals Sa1398 EUS-GUIDED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION: LONG-TERM OUTCOME RESULTS FOR PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS AND PANCREATIC CYSTIC NEOPLASMS IN A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB172
Author(s):  
Marc Barthet ◽  
Marc Giovannini ◽  
Nathalie Lesavre ◽  
Christian Boustiere ◽  
Bertrand Napoleon ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (08) ◽  
pp. E1178-E1185
Author(s):  
Marc Barthet ◽  
Marc Giovannini ◽  
Mohamed Gasmi ◽  
Nathalie Lesavre ◽  
Christian Boustière ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) with worrisome features or high-risk stigmata (WF/HRS) has been evaluated in few series with short-term outcomes. This studyʼs primary endpoint was to assess the long-term efficacy of EUS-RFA in patients with NETs or pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) over at least 3 years. Patients and methods Twelve patients had 14 NETs with a mean 13.4-mm size (10–20) and 17 patients had a cystic tumor (16 IPMN, 1 MCA) with a 29.1-mm mean size (9–60 were included. They were treated with EUS-guided RFA, evaluated prospectively at 1 year, and followed annually for at least 3 years. Results The mean duration of follow-up was 42.9 months (36–53). Four patients died during follow-up (17–42 months) from unrelated diseases.At 1-year follow-up, and 85.7 % complete disappearance was seen in 12 patients with 14 NETs. At the end of follow-up (45.6 months), complete disappearance of tumors was seen in 85.7 % of cases. One case of late liver metastasis occurred in a patient with initial failure of EUS-RFA. At 1-year follow-up, a significant response was seen in 70.5 % of 15 patients with PCNs. At the end of the follow-up, there was a significant response in 66.6 % with no mural nodules. Two cases of distant pancreatic adenocarcinoma unrelated to IPMN occurred. Conclusions EUS-RFA results for pancreatic NETs or PCNs appear to be stable during 42 months of follow-up.


Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (09) ◽  
pp. 836-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Barthet ◽  
Marc Giovannini ◽  
Nathalie Lesavre ◽  
Christian Boustiere ◽  
Bertrand Napoleon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) with worrisome features are surgically managed. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has recently been developed. The safety of EUS-RFA was the primary end point of this study, its efficacy the secondary end point. Methods This was a prospective multicenter study that was planned to include 30 patients with a 1-year follow-up with either a NET < 2 cm or a pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN), either a branch duct IPMN with worrisome features or a mucinous cystadenoma (MCA). EUS-RFA was performed with an 18G RFA cooling needle. Results 12 patients had 14 NETs (mean size 13.1 mm, range 10 – 20 mm); 17 patients had cystic tumors (16 IPMNs, 1 MCA; mean size 28 mm, range 9 – 60 mm). Overall three adverse events occurred (10 %), two of these in the first two patients (one pancreatitis, one small-bowel perforation). After these initial patients, modifications in the protocol resulted in a decrease in complications (3.5 %), with one patient having a pancreatic ductal stenosis. Among the 14 NETs, at 1-year follow-up 12 had completely disappeared (86 % tumor resolution), with three patients having a delayed response. Among the 17 PCNs, at 12 months, there were 11 complete disappearances and one diameter that decreased by > 50 % (significant response rate 71 %). All 12 mural nodules showed complete resolution. Conclusions EUS-RFA of pancreatic NETs or PCNs is safe with a 10 % complication rate, which can be decreased by improved prophylaxis for the procedure.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e0182223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tormund S. Njølstad ◽  
Henrica M. Werner ◽  
Janusz Marcickiewicz ◽  
Solveig Tingulstad ◽  
Anne C. Staff ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven-Petter Haugvik ◽  
Irina Pavlik Marangos ◽  
Bård Ingvald Røsok ◽  
Ewa Pomianowska ◽  
Ivar Prydz Gladhaug ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document