scholarly journals The effects of temperature and duration of thermal pretreatment on the solid-state anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure

Heliyon ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. e02140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilton P.A. McVoitte ◽  
O. Grant Clark
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Katada ◽  
Akira Fukuda ◽  
Chie Nakajima ◽  
Yasuhiko Suzuki ◽  
Takashi Azuma ◽  
...  

Efficient methods for decreasing the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and transfer of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) from livestock manure to humans are urgently needed. Aerobic composting (AC) or anaerobic digestion (AD) are widely used for manure treatment in Japanese dairy farms. To clarify the effects of AC and AD on antimicrobial resistance, the abundances of antimicrobial (tetracycline and cefazolin)-resistant lactose-degrading Enterobacteriaceae as indicator bacteria, copy numbers of ARGs (tetracycline resistance genes and β-lactamase coding genes), and concentrations of residual antimicrobials in dairy cow manure were determined before and after treatment. The concentration of tetracycline/cefazolin-resistant lactose-degrading Enterobacteriaceae was decreased over 1,000-fold by both AC and AD. ARGs such as tetA, tetB, and blaTEM were frequently detected and their copy numbers were significantly reduced by ∼1,000-fold by AD but not by AC. However, several ARG copies remained even after AD treatment. Although concentrations of the majority of residual antimicrobials were decreased by both AC and AD, oxytetracycline level was not decreased after treatment in most cases. In addition, 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based metagenomic analysis revealed that both treatments changed the bacterial community structure. These results suggest that both AC and AD could suppress the transmission of ARB, and AD could reduce ARG copy numbers in dairy cow manure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 184 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Đurđica Kovačić ◽  
Davor Kralik ◽  
Daria Jovičić ◽  
Slavko Rupčić ◽  
Brigita Popović ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S. Giray Velioğlu ◽  
Kriton Curi ◽  
Ahmet Baban ◽  
Necdet Alpaslan

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (17) ◽  
pp. 8288-8293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maritza Macias-Corral ◽  
Zohrab Samani ◽  
Adrian Hanson ◽  
Geoffrey Smith ◽  
Paul Funk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Ephodia Sihlangu ◽  
Dibungi Luseba ◽  
Khathutshelo A. Nephawe ◽  
Florence V. Nherera-Chokuda

Dairy cow manure has high buffering capacity hence a substrate for anaerobic digestion, however the process is not optimised in mono-digestion system due to limited substrate. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of co-digesting animal waste and vegetable waste on methane production. Two systems were applied- batch and continuous anaerobic digestion system to determine effect on methane yield. The experiments were conducted with treatments as: manure alone (M), composite of manure with cabbage (MC), manure with potatoes (MP), manure with cabbage and potatoes (MCP), faecal alone (F), faecal with cabbage (FC), faecal with potatoes (FP) and faecal with cabbage and potatoes (FCP). Rectal grab samples were collected prior to incubation and manure was collected from the pens. All treatments were in replicates. Composite of manure or faecal with cabbage and potatoes produced the highest biogas (FCP: 32.1 mL/g DM, MCP: 29.5 mL/g DM) and methane (FCP: 3.13 mL/g DM, MCP: 2.36 mL/g DM) compared to manure alone or faecal alone (F: 27.0 biogas mL/g DM, M: 26.6 biogas mL/g DM) (F: 1.36 methane mL/g DM, M: 1.18 methane mL/g DM). Co-digesting dairy excreta with cabbage as only vegetable substrate affected anaerobic digestion (FC: 24.8 mL/g DM, MC: 24.9 mL/g DM), since it was the lowest in biogas production compared to all treatments. The anaerobic digestion system had an effect in methane production since continuous anaerobic digestion system produced the highest methane compared to batch anaerobic digestion system in all treatments. The results obtained in this study suggest that composite of manure with both cabbage and potatoes results in the highest biogas and methane production.


2019 ◽  
Vol 274 ◽  
pp. 215-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Đurđica Kovačić ◽  
Davor Kralik ◽  
Slavko Rupčić ◽  
Daria Jovičić ◽  
Robert Spajić ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document