scholarly journals The effect of resting morphological lip shape during lip movement: A three-dimensional motion analysis study

Heliyon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e04093
Author(s):  
Siti Hajjar Nasir ◽  
Hashmat Popat ◽  
Stephen Richmond
2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Agosti ◽  
Carmine Vitale ◽  
Dario Avella ◽  
Rosaria Rucco ◽  
Gabriella Santangelo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-199
Author(s):  
TAIKI MATSUBARA ◽  
KAZUTO TERADA ◽  
YASUO NAKAMURA ◽  
TOYOHIKO HAYASHI ◽  
SHIGEO MORISHIMA ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Agosti ◽  
Carmine Vitale ◽  
Dario Avella ◽  
Rosaria Rucco ◽  
Gabriella Santangelo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1337-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmine Vitale ◽  
Valeria Agosti ◽  
Dario Avella ◽  
Gabriella Santangelo ◽  
Marianna Amboni ◽  
...  

Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro SEO ◽  
Tomoko ISHIZU ◽  
Akiko ATSUMI ◽  
Ryo KAWAMURA ◽  
Kazutaka AONUMA

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1242
Author(s):  
Georg Haider ◽  
Ursula Schulz ◽  
Nikola Katic ◽  
Christian Peham ◽  
Gilles Dupré

Single-port access systems (SPASs) are currently used in human and veterinary surgeries. However, they pose technical challenges, such as instrument crowding, intra- and extracorporeal instrument collision, and reduced maneuverability. Studies comparing the maneuverability of the scopes and instruments in different SPASs are lacking. This study aimed to compare the maneuverability of three different SPASs: the Covidien SILS-port, Storz Endocone, and glove port. A clear acrylic box with artificial skin placed at the bottom was used to mimic the abdominal wall and cavity. The three SPASs were placed from below, and a 10-mm endoscope and 5-mm instrument were introduced. A motion analysis system consisting of 18 cameras and motion analysis software were used to track the movement of the endoscope and instrument, to determine the volume of the cone-shaped, three-dimensional figures over which movement was possible, with higher values indicating greater maneuverability. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the analysis. The maneuverability of the endoscope alone was significantly higher in the glove port system than in the other two SPASs. When inserting an additional instrument, the maneuverability significantly decreased in the SILS-port and Endocone, but not in the glove port. The highest maneuverability overall was found in the glove port.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phob Ganokroj ◽  
Nuchanun Sompornpanich ◽  
Pichitpol Kerdsomnuek ◽  
Bavornrat Vanadurongwan ◽  
Pisit Lertwanich

Abstract Background Measurement of hip rotation is a crucial clinical parameter for the identification of hip problems and the monitoring of symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of two smartphone applications is valid and reliable for the measurement of hip rotation. Methods An experimental, cross-sectional study was undertaken to assess passive hip internal and external rotation in three positions by two examiners. The hip rotational angles were measured by a smartphone clinometer application in the sitting and prone positions, and by a smartphone compass application in the supine position; their results were compared with those of the standard, three-dimensional, motion analysis system. The validities and inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the smartphone applications were evaluated. Results The study involved 24 participants. The validities were good to excellent for the internal rotation angles in all positions (ICC 0.81–0.94), good for the external rotation angles in the prone position (ICC 0.79), and fair for the sitting and supine positions (ICC 0.70–0.73). The measurement of the hip internal rotation in the supine position had the highest ICC value of 0.94 (0.91, 0.96). The two smartphone applications showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, but good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability for only three of the six positions (two other positions had fair reliability, while one position demonstrated poor reliability). Conclusions The two smartphone applications have good-to-excellent validity and intra-rater reliability, but only fair-to-good inter-rater reliability for the measurement of the hip rotational angle. The most valid hip rotational position in this study was the supine IR angle measurement, while the lowest validity was the ER angle measurement in the sitting position. The smartphone application is one of the practical measurements in hip rotational angles. Trial registration Number 20181022003 at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th) which was retrospectively registered at 2018-10-18 15:30:29.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document