TeleClinical Care: A Randomised Control Trial of a Smartphone-Based Model of Care for Patients with Heart Failure or Acute Coronary Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S101
Author(s):  
P. Indraratna ◽  
U. Biswas ◽  
J. McVeigh ◽  
A. Ziegl ◽  
A. Mamo ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
А. С. Пушкин

В обзорной статье собраны современные представления об особенностях диагностики и мониторинга пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста с сердечной недостаточностью и стенокардией. Особое внимание уделено проблеме коморбидности пациентов старше 65 лет, что требует корректирующих действий при стратификации риска и прогнозировании клинических исходов. Отмечена приоритетность неинвазивных диагностических тестов. Рекомендована оценка хрупкости как неотъемлемой части диагностического процесса пациентов с сердечной недостаточностью и стенокардией ввиду чёткой связи с худшим прогнозом с точки зрения качества жизни, госпитализации и смертности. Review is about current information on the features of heart failure and angina diagnosis and monitoring in elderly and senile patients. One of the main problem in patients over 65 years is comorbidity, which requires corrective action in the risk stratification and prediction of clinical outcomes. The priority of non-invasive diagnostic tests is noted. Authors of the article recommend frailty as an obligatory part of diagnostic process in patients with heart failure and angina due to a clear connection with the worst prognosis in terms of quality of life, hospitalization and mortality.


2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Wilson Grandin ◽  
Petr Jarolim ◽  
Sabina A Murphy ◽  
Lea Ritterova ◽  
Christopher P Cannon ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Galectin-3 is a β-galactoside–binding lectin that has been implicated in cardiac fibrosis and remodeling, is increased in models of failure-prone hearts, and has prognostic value in patients with heart failure (HF). The relationship between galectin-3 and the development of HF after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. METHODS In a nested case-control study among patients with ACS in PROVE IT-TIMI 22, we identified 100 cases with a hospitalization for new or worsening HF. Controls were matched (1:1) for age, sex, ACS type, and randomized treatment. Serum galectin-3 was measured at baseline (within 7 days post-ACS). RESULTS Patients who developed HF had higher baseline galectin-3 [median 16.7 μg/L (25th, 75th percentile 14.0, 20.6) vs 14.6 μg/L (12.0, 17.6), P = 0.004]. Patients with baseline galectin-3 above the median had an odds ratio of 2.1 (95% CI 1.2–3.6) for developing HF, P = 0.010. Galectin-3 showed a graded relationship with risk of HF. Cases were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, prior MI, and prior HF; after adjustment for these factors, this graded relationship with galectin-3 quartile and HF remained significant [adjusted OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1–1.9), P = 0.020]. When BNP was added to the model, the relationship between galectin-3 and HF was attenuated [adjusted OR 1.3 (95% CI: 0.96–1.9), P = 0.08]. CONCLUSIONS The finding that galectin-3 is associated with the risk of developing HF following ACS adds to emerging evidence supporting galectin-3 as a biomarker of adverse remodeling contributing to HF as well as a potential therapeutic target.


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav R de Peuter ◽  
Federico Lussana ◽  
Pieter W Kamphuisen

Background: Guidelines generally recommend the use of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It has recently been suggested that non-selective beta-blockers were more effective than selective beta-blockers in HF. However, a better efficacy of different beta-blockers, specifically analyzing total and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity, in patients with HF or ACS is unclear. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify RCTs comparing selective or non-selective beta-blockers with placebo (29 studies, 31,856 patients), or directly comparing the two different beta-blockers (5 studies, 3,733 patients). Studies were selected using a priori defined criteria and data on study characteristics, study quality and outcomes were abstracted. All included studies had (cardiovascular) mortality as primary or secondary endpoint. Results: In patients with HF non-selective beta-blockers were associated with a reduction in total mortality (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.61–0.92), and with a non significant decrease in CV mortality. Selective beta-blockers decreased total and CV mortality (RR 0.76, 0.68–0.84 and RR 0.78, 0.66–0.92, respectively). In patients with ACS non-selective beta-blockers were associated with a significant decrease in total mortality (RR 0.73, 0.64–0.82), CV mortality (RR 0.69, 0.60–0.80) and CV morbidity. Selective beta-blockers however had no effect on total mortality (RR 0.88, 0.68–1.15) or CV mortality (RR 0.89, 0.69–1.15). In HF, direct comparison showed a significantly decreased mortality (RR 0.86, 0.78–0.94) for non-selective beta-blockers compared to selective beta-blockers. For ACS, only one study directly compared different beta-blockers. Conclusions: In patients with HF, selective and non-selective beta-blockers seem equally effective in reducing mortality. In patients with ACS, selective beta-blockers had no influence on total and cardiovascular mortality, in contrast to non-selective beta-blockers. This meta-analysis suggests that patients with ACS should specifically be treated with non-selective beta-blockers to reduce total and cardiovascular mortality.


Maturitas ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matina Kouvari ◽  
Christina Chrysohoou ◽  
Eleptherios Tsiamis ◽  
Hara Kosyfa ◽  
Lemonia Kalogirou ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 176 (1) ◽  
pp. 260-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Lazzeri ◽  
Serafina Valente ◽  
Marco Chiostri ◽  
Maria Grazia D'Alfonso ◽  
Serena Fatucchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document