Enhanced hydrogen-rich gas production from steam gasification of coal in a pressurized fluidized bed with CaO as a CO2 sorbent

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 5781-5792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinhui Wang ◽  
Nai Rong ◽  
Hongtao Fan ◽  
Yongjie Meng ◽  
Mengxiang Fang ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 427-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Fremaux ◽  
Sayyed-Mohsen Beheshti ◽  
Hojat Ghassemi ◽  
Rasoul Shahsavan-Markadeh

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 579
Author(s):  
Max Schmid ◽  
Selina Hafner ◽  
Günter Scheffknecht

The conversion of biogenic residues to fuels and chemicals via gasification and synthesis processes is a promising pathway to replace fossil carbon. In this study, the focus is set on sewage sludge gasification for syngas production. Experiments were carried out in a 20 kW fuel input bubbling fluidized bed facility with steam and oxygen as gasification agent. In-situ produced sewage sludge ash was used as bed material. The sensitivity of the key operation parameters gasifier temperature, oxygen ratio, steam to carbon ratio, and the space velocity on the syngas composition (H2, CO, CO2, CH4, CxHy, H2S, COS, NH3, and tars) was determined. The results show that the produced syngas has high H2 and CO concentrations of up to 0.37 m3 m−3 and 0.18 m3 m−3, respectively, and is thus suitable for synthesis of fuels and chemicals. By adjusting the steam to carbon ratio, the syngas’ H2 to CO ratio can be purposely tailored by the water gas shift reaction for various synthesis products, e.g., synthetic natural gas (H2/CO = 3) or Fischer–Tropsch products (H2/CO = 2). Also, the composition and yields of fly ash and bed ash are presented. Through the gasification process, the cadmium and mercury contents of the bed ash were drastically reduced. The ash is suitable as secondary raw material for phosphorous or phosphate fertilizer production. Overall, a broad database was generated that can be used for process simulation and process design.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2006
Author(s):  
Diamantis Almpantis ◽  
Anastasia Zabaniotou

This study explored the suitability of simulation tools for accurately predicting fluidized bed gasification in various scenarios without disturbing the operational system, and dedicating time to experimentation, in the aim of benefiting the decision makers and investors of the low-carbon waste-based bioenergy sector, in accelerating circular bioeconomy solutions. More specifically, this study aimed to offer a customized circular bioeconomy solution for a rice processing residue. The objectives were the simulation and economic assessment of an air atmospheric fluidized bed gasification system fueled with rice husk, for combined heat and power generation, by using the tools of Aspen Plus V9, and the Aspen Process Economic Analyzer. The simulation model was based on the Gibbs energy minimization concept. The technological configurations of the SMARt-CHP technology were used. A parametric study was conducted to understand the influence of process variables on product yield, while three different scenarios were compared: (1) air gasification; (2) steam gasification; and (3) oxygen-steam gasification-based scenario. Simulated results show good accuracy for the prediction of H2 in syngas from air gasification, but not for the other gas components, especially regarding CO and CH4 content. It seems that the RGIBBS and Gibbs free minimization concept is far from simulating the operation of a fluidized bed gasifier. The air gasification scenario for a capacity of 25.000 t/y rice husk was assessed for its economic viability. The economic assessment resulted in net annual earnings of EUR 5.1 million and a positive annual revenue of EUR 168/(t/y), an excellent pay out time (POT = 0.21) and return of investment (ROI = 2.8). The results are dependent on the choices and assumptions made.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Aleksandrovich Shevyrev ◽  
Nikita Eugenievich Mazheiko ◽  
Sergei Konstantinovich Yakutin ◽  
Pavel Aleksandrovich Strizhak

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 5181-5189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Sakaguchi ◽  
A. Paul Watkinson ◽  
Naoko Ellis

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingbo Wang ◽  
Bo Xiao ◽  
Shiming Liu ◽  
Zhiquan Hu ◽  
Piwen He ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 333 ◽  
pp. 697-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy N. Antzara ◽  
Aitor Arregi ◽  
Eleni Heracleous ◽  
Angeliki A. Lemonidou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document