Reassessing Prognostic Factors in the Era of Combined Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Analysis of RTOG 9410 and 9801

Author(s):  
C.J. Langer ◽  
S. Swann ◽  
W. Curran ◽  
B. Movsas ◽  
M. Werner-Wasik ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 3201-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Schild ◽  
Philip J. Stella ◽  
Susan M. Geyer ◽  
James A. Bonner ◽  
William L. McGinnis ◽  
...  

Purpose: The North Central Cancer Treatment Group performed a phase III trial to determine whether chemotherapy plus either bid radiation therapy (RT) or daily (qd) RT resulted in a better outcome for patients with stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No difference in survival was identified between the two arms. This secondary analysis was performed to examine the relationship between patient age and outcome. Patients and Methods: Two hundred forty-six patients were randomized to receive etoposide plus cisplatin and either RT qd or split-course RT bid. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of patients aged ≥70 years (“elderly patients”) with those of younger individuals. Of the 244 assessable patients, 63 (26%) were elderly, and 181 (74%) were younger individuals. Results: The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 39% and 18%, respectively, in patients younger than 70 years, compared with 36% and 13%, respectively, in elderly patients (P = .4). Grade 4+ toxicity occurred in 62% of patients younger than 70 years compared with 81% of elderly patients (P = .007). Grade 4+ hematologic toxicity occurred in 56% of patients younger than 70 years, compared with 78% of elderly patients (P = .003). Grade 4+ pneumonitis occurred in 1% of those younger than 70 years, compared with 6% of elderly patients (P = .02). Conclusion: Toxicity, especially myelosuppression and pneumonitis, was more pronounced in the elderly patients receiving combined-modality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Despite increased toxicity, elderly patients have survival rates equivalent to younger individuals. Therefore, fit, elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC should be encouraged to receive combined-modality therapy, preferably on clinical trials with cautious, judicious monitoring. Future studies should explore ways to decrease toxicity of therapy in elderly patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 886-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond H. Mak ◽  
Elizabeth Doran ◽  
Alona Muzikansky ◽  
Josephine Kang ◽  
Joel W. Neal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
LiJun Tian ◽  
HongZhi Liu ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Dian-Zhong Geng ◽  
Yu-Qing Huo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined-modality therapy for tumor invading the chest wall of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 21 elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) with locally advanced NSCLC diagnosed as tumor invading the chest wall. The prescription dose of the primary tumor adopting external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was given 40 Gy which was supplemented with iodine-125 seed implantation, meanwhile the lymph nodes of mediastinum undergoing EBRT was given 60 Gy. Follow-up was conducted every 3 months postoperatively. The related analytic parameters were the change of tumor size, the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), the degree of pain relief, the improvement of physical status and the toxicity. Results The combined-modality therapy could significantly inhibit the local growth of tumor (from 7.84 ± 1.20 to 4.69 ± 1.90 cm) (P < 0.0001), indicating a better validity with an ORR of 71.4% and DCR 90.5%, respectively at 1 year. The cancer-related pain was significantly relieved (P < 0.05) and the physical status were also significantly improved (P < 0.05). There was no procedure-associated death or grade > 2 irradiation-related adverse effect in our study. Conclusions The combined-modality therapy of EBRT with 40 Gy and permanent iodine-125 seed implantation is an efficacious and safe option and may be recommended as a treatment pattern for the elderly of locally advanced NSCLC with tumor invading the chest wall.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17143-17143
Author(s):  
K. Kishi ◽  
A. Okazaki ◽  
H. Takaya ◽  
A. Miyamoto ◽  
S. Sakamoto ◽  
...  

17143 Background: Combined modality therapy with P, C and radiation for locally advanced NSCLC is active, but its clinical data are limited in Japan. The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of the therapy in a Japanese general hospital. Methods: Patients with previously untreated and locally advanced NSCLC with stage IIIA and IIIB (PS 0–1, weight loss less than 5% over past 3 months) were treated with P (40 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15, 22, 29, 36, 43), C (AUC 2 on days 1,8,15, 22, 29, 36, 43) and TRT (66 Gy/33fr over 6.5 weeks starting on day1). Results: Fifteen evaluable patients entered this study between December 2001 and March 2005. They were 12 males, 3 females, with median age 67 (57–76); 6 patients with ECOG PS 0, 9 with PS 1, 8 with stage IIIA, and 7 with IIIB. Chemotherapeutic agents were administered a median of 6 cycles (4–7) and 66 Gy of TRT done in 14 patients. It achieved 13 PRs, 1 SD and 1 PD with a response rate of 86.7%. Survival was 85.5% at 1 year, 66.0% at 2 year and 66.0% at 3 year. Eleven patients are still alive. A relapse occurred in 10 patients (66.7%) and 5 were disease-free (33.3%). The site of first relapse was distant in 5 patients, local in 3, and both local and distant in 2. Toxicity was mild: grade 3 neutropenia in 2 patients, grade 3 nausea in 1, and grade 3 esophagitis in 1. No grade 3/4 pneumonitis was observed. After completion of chemoradiotherapy scheduled, 2 patients received additional chemotherapy of PC and 1 underwent lobectomy. Conclusion: Although the number of patients is small in this study, concurrent PC and TRT for locally advanced NSCLC is feasible and highly effective for Japanese patients with good PS and minimal weight loss. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 363-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunnie Kim ◽  
Karen T. Brown ◽  
Yuman Fong ◽  
Stephen Barnett Solomon ◽  
Joanne F. Chou ◽  
...  

363 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) provides a survival benefit in a subset of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Even though data are lacking, patients with metastatic HCC (mHCC) are sometimes treated with transarterial therapies to address the hepatic disease. Sorafenib is a standard treatment for patients with mHCC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with HCC who had undergone hepatic arterial embolization (HAE) between 2006 and until 2013. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of HAE to date of death and estimated by Kaplan Meier Methods. Patients alive at their last follow up date were censored. Results: Of 243 patients who had undergone HAE at MSKCC during the study period, 36 patients had mHCC on initial diagnosis. Of these, 22 received HAE only, while 14 received HAE plus systemic therapy at some time during their whole treatment course. Conclusions: Patients with mHCC who underwent HAE alone had a poor OS. These data suggest that there maybe a survival benefit in patients with mHCC treated with transarterial therapies add to systemic therapy that is given at some time during their whole treatment course. These results contrast with recent data on the use of combined modality in locally advanced disease. Further studies of combined modality therapy in the setting of mHCC may be warranted. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document