Favorable Outcome in Stage I-II Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Report of 160 Patients From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG)

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. S151-S152 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dabaja ◽  
R.W. Tsang ◽  
S. Qi ◽  
P. Allen ◽  
D. Hodgson ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4292-4292
Author(s):  
Bouthaina S. Dabaja ◽  
Richard Tsang ◽  
Shunan Qi ◽  
Pamela Allen ◽  
David C. Hodgson ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) often present with advanced-stage and have a poor prognosis. Although MCL is highly radiosensitive, RT is rarely used other than for palliation. Stage I-II presentation is rare, and there is only limited data on treatment outcome with less aggressive combined modality approaches or RT alone. To assess the outcome of this group of patients, we retrospectively reviewed 82 patients referred to radiation oncology at 9 ILROG institutions between 1990 and 2012. Of the 82 patients, 65 (79%) were males, 44 (54%) were > 60 years; 47 (57%) were stage I, 61 (74%) presented in the head and neck areas, 51 (62%) had extranodal presentation, 14 (17%) were bulky (>5 cm). Treatment approaches consisted of combined modality (CM) with chemotherapy and consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in 66 (80%) and definitive RT alone in 16 (20%). The median radiation dose used was 35 Gy (range 12-45). Chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like, regimens in 62 (57%), rituximab was added to chemotherapy in 51 (62%). The median follow-up was 60 months (range 5-245). At last follow up, 26 (32%) patients relapsed (70% of relapses were outside the radiation field) and 21 (26%) died (2 deaths unrelated to disease or treatment). The 5-and 10-years overall survivals (OS) were 71% and 63%, respectively. The 5-and 10-years disease free survivals (DFS) were 75% and 39%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the following characteristics were significantly associated with DFS and OS: age as a continuous variable (HR=1.05, p=0.005 for DFS; HR=1.05, p=0.006 for OS) and bulky disease (HR=2.78, p=0.03 for DFS; HR= 3.18, p=0.02 for OS). On multivariate analysis, both DFS and OS were significantly influenced by: age as a continuous variable (HR=2.09, p=0.03; HR=1.05, p=0.005), bulky disease (HR=2.23, p=0.05; HR=3.1, p=0.03), and female gender only affected DFS (HR=2.16, p=0.03).SurvivalAll (%)Combined modality (%)RT alone up-front(%)5-years OS71689210-years OS6362745-years DFS75738910-years DFS393657 Conclusion Patients who presented with stage I-II MCL and were treated with programs that included consolidative local radiotherapy or even radiotherapy alone demonstrated favorable disease control and relatively long survival. It appears that radiotherapy as a sole modality can offer in selected patients a comparable DFS and OS to a combined modality approach. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1665-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie E. Chang ◽  
Hailun Li ◽  
Mitchell R. Smith ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
Elisabeth M. Paietta ◽  
...  

Key Points VcR-CVAD produced high overall and CR rates in previously untreated MCL patients. No substantial difference in 3-year PFS or OS was observed in patients receiving ASCT compared with patients receiving maintenance rituximab.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19566-e19566
Author(s):  
Apoorva Jayarangaiah ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Tarek N. Elrafei ◽  
Lewis Steinberg ◽  
Abhishek Kumar

e19566 Background: Limited stage mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (stage I-II) is rare and occurs in 5-15% of patients. The ideal treatment approach among radiation (RT), chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or close monitoring (NT) has not been defined. Methods: A retrospective analysis of SEER database (1975 to 2018) was conducted for patients with stage I-II MCL to compare overall survival (OS) among the various treatment modalities in patients >18 years. We excluded patients lacking information on demographic characteristics and survival. Patients were analyzed in 4 groups; RT only, CT only, CRT and no treatment groups. ANOVA test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate parametric and non-parametric variables between groups, respectively. Cancer specific survival (CSS) and OS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis. Results: There were in total 2266 patients with limited stage MCL. Median age was 71 years (61-78.25) and predominantly male (65.7%). Stage I MCL was noted in 55.6% and stage II in 44.4% of the patients. The number of patients in each group; RT only, CT only, CRT and NT along with the OS are presented in Table. CSS among these four groups showed no statistically significant differences (p <0.26). OS showed that CT only group has worse survival compared to RT only and CRT groups (p <0.001). CRT has no significant difference in survival compared to RT only (p<0.001). NT was associated with poorest survival rates (p<0.001). Conclusions: In limited stage MCL, RT only and CRT resulted in superior OS compared to CT only. Results suggest a role for incorporation of RT in treatment regimens. One limitation of the study is that the SEER database lacks the ability to distinguish between no receipt of therapy versus lack of availability of data.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document