scholarly journals Racial Disparities in Culturally Competent Health Care among Cancer Survivors in the United States

Author(s):  
S.S. Butler ◽  
B.A. Mahal ◽  
P.L. Nguyen ◽  
N.N. Sanford
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 246-246
Author(s):  
Janice Bell ◽  
Robin L. Whitney ◽  
Sarah Reed ◽  
Andra Davis ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
...  

246 Background: Recent national reports highlight gaps in the quality of health care received by the growing population of cancer survivors in the United States. A deeper understanding of the health care experiences of cancer survivors and related disparities could inform interventions designed to address these gaps. Methods: Data from the 2011 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey Household Component and Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement (n=1,592) were used to compare health care experiences of survivors those those of individuals in active treatment. Logistic regression models of three outcomes (receipt of necessary care; detailed discussions with providers about late or long-term side effects of cancer treatment; and detailed discussions with providers about lifestyle or health recommendations e.g., diet, exercise, quitting smoking) were controlled for potential confounding variables including age, sex, health insurance status, education, race/ethnicity, and marital status. Survey weights were applied to account for the complex sampling design and estimates are generalizable to the US civilian, non-institutionalized population. Results: Most respondents (96%), whether or not they were in active treatment, reported they had received all medical care, tests, or treatments that they or their providers believed were necessary. Fewer survivors, compared to respondents in active treatment, reported their providers had discussed late or long-term side effects (37% versus 61%; p<0.01) or lifestyle recommendations with them in detail (57% versus 72%). These associations persisted in the multivariable models of side effect discussions (OR=0.38; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.55) and lifestyle recommendations (OR=; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.68) regardless of the length of time since treatment had finished. Subgroups with lower odds of all three outcomes included those with public or no insurance and those with lower levels of education. Conclusions: Care received after treatment for cancer may not fully address the unique needs of cancer survivors and, in particular, those with public or no insurance and with low levels of education regardless of treatment status. Targeted interventions with a focus on these subgroups may be required.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e125-e134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Soneji ◽  
Katrina Armstrong ◽  
David A. Asch

Whether the United States is able to equitably meet future demand for colorectal cancer screening may depend on access, physician supply, and organization of the health care system.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence N. Shulman ◽  
Linda A. Jacobs ◽  
Sheldon Greenfield ◽  
Barbara Jones ◽  
Mary S. McCabe ◽  
...  

The combination of a shortfall in oncologists and primary care physicians and an increased number of patients using more health care resources raises concerns about our health care system's ability to accommodate future patients with cancer and cancer survivors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
David R. Holmes ◽  
Michael J. Mack ◽  
Mohamad Alkhouli ◽  
Sreekanth Vemulapalli

Author(s):  
Ann H. Partridge ◽  
Paul B. Jacobsen ◽  
Barbara L. Andersen

There are over 14 million survivors of cancer living in the United States alone and tens of millions more worldwide, with this population expected to nearly double in the next decade. The successes of prevention, early detection, and better therapies have lead to an emerging understanding of the substantial medical and psychosocial issues for this growing population that must be tackled for individuals and from the health care system and societal perspectives.


JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santino S. Butler ◽  
Karen M. Winkfield ◽  
Chul Ahn ◽  
Zirui Song ◽  
Edward C. Dee ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Dana

This paper describes the status of multicultural assessment training, research, and practice in the United States. Racism, politicization of issues, and demands for equity in assessment of psychopathology and personality description have created a climate of controversy. Some sources of bias provide an introduction to major assessment issues including service delivery, moderator variables, modifications of standard tests, development of culture-specific tests, personality theory and cultural/racial identity description, cultural formulations for psychiatric diagnosis, and use of findings, particularly in therapeutic assessment. An assessment-intervention model summarizes this paper and suggests dimensions that compel practitioners to ask questions meriting research attention and providing avenues for developments of culturally competent practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document