Development of Nusselt number and friction factor correlations for the shell side of spiral-wound heat exchangers

2019 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mostafazade Abolmaali ◽  
Hossein Afshin
Author(s):  
M. R. Salem ◽  
K. M. Elshazly ◽  
R. Y. Sakr ◽  
R. K. Ali

The present work introduces an experimental study of horizontal shell and coil heat exchangers. Characteristics of the convective heat transfer in this type of heat exchangers and the friction factor for fully developed flow through their helically coiled tube (HCT) were investigated. The majority of previous studies were performed on HCTs with isothermal and isoflux boundary conditions or shell and coil heat exchangers with small ranges of HCT configurations and fluid-operating conditions. Here, five heat exchangers of counterflow configuration were constructed with different HCT torsions (λ) and tested at different mass flow rates and inlet temperatures of both sides of the heat exchangers. In total, 295 test runs were performed from which the HCT-side and shell-side heat transfer coefficients were calculated. Results showed that the average Nusselt numbers of both sides of the heat exchangers and the overall heat transfer coefficient increase by decreasing coil torsion. At lower and higher HCT-side Reynolds number (Ret), the average increase in the HCT-side average Nusselt number (Nu¯t) is of 108.7% and 58.6%, respectively, when λ decreases from 0.1348 to 0.0442. While, at lower and higher shell-side Reynolds number (Resh), the average increase in the shell-side average Nusselt number (Nu¯sh) is of 173.9% and 69.5%, respectively, when λ decreases from 0.1348 to 0.0442. In addition, a slight increase of 6.4% is obtained in the HCT Fanning friction factor (fc) at lower Ret when λ decreases from 0.1348 to 0.0442, and this effect vanishes with increasing Ret. Furthermore, correlations for Nu¯t, Nu¯sh, and fc are obtained.


Author(s):  
M. R. Salem ◽  
K. M. Elshazly ◽  
R. Y. Sakr ◽  
R. K. Ali

The present work experimentally investigates the characteristics of convective heat transfer in horizontal shell and coil heat exchangers in addition to friction factor for fully developed flow through the helically coiled tube (HCT). The majority of previous studies were performed on HCTs with isothermal and isoflux boundary conditions or shell and coil heat exchangers with small ranges of HCT configurations and fluid operating conditions. Here, five heat exchangers of counter-flow configuration were constructed with different HCT-curvature ratios (δ) and tested at different mass flow rates and inlet temperatures of the two sides of the heat exchangers. Totally, 295 test runs were performed from which the HCT-side and shell-side heat transfer coefficients were calculated. Results showed that the average Nusselt numbers of the two sides of the heat exchangers and the overall heat transfer coefficients increased by increasing coil curvature ratio. The average increase in the average Nusselt number is of 160.3–80.6% for the HCT side and of 224.3–92.6% for the shell side when δ increases from 0.0392 to 0.1194 within the investigated ranges of different parameters. Also, for the same flow rate in both heat exchanger sides, the effect of coil pitch and number of turns with the same coil torsion and tube length is remarkable on shell average Nusselt number while it is insignificant on HCT-average Nusselt number. In addition, a significant increase of 33.2–7.7% is obtained in the HCT-Fanning friction factor (fc) when δ increases from 0.0392 to 0.1194. Correlations for the average Nusselt numbers for both heat exchanger sides and the HCT Fanning friction factor as a function of the investigated parameters are obtained.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5304
Author(s):  
Howard Lee ◽  
Ali Sadeghianjahromi ◽  
Po-Lun Kuo ◽  
Chi-Chuan Wang

An experimental study regarding the thermofluid characteristics of a shell-and-plate heat exchanger with different chevron angles (45°/45°, 45°/65°, and 65°/65°) with a plate diameter of 440 mm was carried out. Water was used as the working fluid on both sides and the corresponding temperatures ranged from 30–70 °C. The flow rate on the plate or shell side ranged from 10–60 m3/h. The effects of chevron angles on the heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics of shell-and-plate heat exchangers were studied in detail. With regard to the heat transfer performance on the plate side, a higher chevron angle (65°/65°) resulted in a significantly better performance than a low chevron angle (45°/45°). The effect of the chevron angle became even more pronounced at high Reynolds numbers. Unlike the plate side, an increase in the chevron angle had a negative effect on the heat transfer performance of the shell side. Additionally, this opposite effect was more prominent at low Reynolds numbers due to the comparatively large contribution of the manifold. The friction factor increased appreciably with the increase in the chevron angle. However, when changing the chevron angle from 45°/45° to 65°/65°, the increase in the friction factor was about 3–4 times on the plate side while it was about 2 times on the shell side. This can be attributed to the presence of the distribution/collection manifold on the shell side. Empirical correlations for the Nusselt number and friction factor were developed for different combinations of chevron angles with mean deviations of less than 1%.


1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Olson

We have measured heat transfer and pressure drop of three thin, compact heat exchangers in helium gas at 3.5 MPa and higher, with Reynolds numbers of 450 to 36,000. The flow geometries for the three heat exchanger specimens were: circular tube, rectangular channel, and staggered pin fin with tapered pins. The specimens were heated radiatively at heat fluxes up to 77 W/cm2. Correlations were developed for the isothermal friction factor as a function of Reynolds number, and for the Nusselt number as a function of Reynolds number and the ratio of wall temperature to fluid temperature. The specimen with the pin fin internal geometry had significantly better heat transfer than the other specimens, but it also had higher pressure drop. For certain conditions of helium flow and heating, the temperature more than doubled from the inlet to the outlet of the specimens, producing large changes in gas velocity, density, viscosity, and thermal conductivity. These changes in properties did not affect the correlations for friction factor and Nusselt number in turbulent flow.


Open Physics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1121-1135
Author(s):  
Chulin Yu ◽  
Haiqing Zhang ◽  
Youqiang Wang ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Bingjun Gao ◽  
...  

Abstract Round rod baffle (RRB), plain plate baffle (PPB), wavy-shaped plate baffle (WSB) and polygonal-shaped plate baffle (PSB) are four commonly used baffles in parallel flow shell and tube heat exchangers (STHXs). Comparative study of these four different baffles are numerically carried out using different performance indicators including Nusselt number, friction factor, performance evaluation criterion, entropy generation ratio, and entransy dissipation ratio for flow in full turbulent regime. Heat transfer mechanism has also been discussed. Correlations for Nusselt number and friction factor are fitted and the cost estimation using Hall’s method is compared. It is found that the Nusselt number of STHX-PPB, STHX-WSB, and STHX-PSB increased by 20.9%, 15.2%, and 23.9% averagely compared with STHX-RRB, respectively. The friction factor can be increased on average by 142.0%, 154.5%, and 242.4%, respectively. However, the overall performance of them is only 90.1%, 84.4%, and 82.3% that of STHX-RRB, respectively. The sequence of entropy generation and entransy dissipation is STHX-RRB > STHX-WSB > STHX-PPB > STHX-PSB. The inlet Re and baffle distance have significant effects on different performance indicators while the baffle width does not. Finally, the results show that the STHX-PSB can reduce the total cost as it has better ability on heat enhancement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
QiXiong Tang ◽  
GaoFei Chen ◽  
ZhiQiang Yang ◽  
Jun Shen ◽  
MaoQiong Gong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document