Transitioning to a business rule management service model: Case studies from the property and casualty insurance industry

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Nelson ◽  
John Peterson ◽  
Robert L. Rariden ◽  
Ravi Sen
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 101-116
Author(s):  
Ceng Guoqing ◽  
Yan An ◽  
Ou Jia ◽  
Jiang Lihui ◽  
Pan Xingliang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Margreet B. Michel-Verkerke ◽  
Roel W. Schuring ◽  
Ton A.M. Spil

In the previous two chapters, the determinants and theoretical background of the USE IT model is discussed. In this chapter, the application of the USE IT model in three cases are described to show the value and benefits of the USE IT model in practice. The USE IT model has four determinants: resistance, relevance, requirements, and resources. It can be used ex ante and ex post. The USE IT model is applied ex ante to find relevance and appropriate choices to overcome resistance for an ICT support of the multiple sclerosis (MS) healthcare chain and the rheumatism care guide, and as well ex ante as ex post in a local stroke service to measure the feasibility of a mobile device for general practitioners. The USE IT model proved to be very helpful not only in revealing the most urgent and relevant problems but also in discovering the crucial obstacles and prerequisites for implementing a solution to these problems. By that, the USE IT model served as a strong tool to decide whether healthcare processes should be supported by ICT and, if so, what processes should be used and how.


Author(s):  
Harish Maringanti

Framing a technology question as a simple choice between developing an in- house application system and off-the- shelf proprietary system, or simply put, as a choice between build and buy, runs the risk of ignoring myriad options available in between the two extremes. In this era of cloud computing and run anything-as- a-service model, the very notion of developing an in-house application would raise a few eyebrows among C- level executives. How then can academic libraries, under mounting pressure to demonstrate their value (Oakleaf, 2010), justify investments in software development in particular? What follows in these sections is a brief discussion on the importance of investing in software development in libraries, three mini-case studies demonstrating the wide possibilities of integrating software development in library operations and a non- prescriptive model to assess which projects may be worth pursuing from the software development standpoint.


2022 ◽  
pp. 1444-1457
Author(s):  
Harish Maringanti

Framing a technology question as a simple choice between developing an in- house application system and off-the- shelf proprietary system, or simply put, as a choice between build and buy, runs the risk of ignoring myriad options available in between the two extremes. In this era of cloud computing and run anything-as- a-service model, the very notion of developing an in-house application would raise a few eyebrows among C- level executives. How then can academic libraries, under mounting pressure to demonstrate their value (Oakleaf, 2010), justify investments in software development in particular? What follows in these sections is a brief discussion on the importance of investing in software development in libraries, three mini-case studies demonstrating the wide possibilities of integrating software development in library operations and a non- prescriptive model to assess which projects may be worth pursuing from the software development standpoint.


Author(s):  
Pengzhu Zhang ◽  
Xiaoning Mao ◽  
Xieping Tang ◽  
Daniel Zeng
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 527 ◽  
pp. 656-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Li ◽  
Stein Beldring ◽  
C.-Y. Xu ◽  
Matthias Huss ◽  
Kjetil Melvold ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document