Major trauma centres and trauma networks – The potential impact on surgical training

Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-177
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Gray ◽  
Paul V. Fearon ◽  
Rob Gregory
2018 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Breeze ◽  
J G Combes ◽  
J DuBose ◽  
D B Powers

IntroductionThe conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan provided military surgeons from the USA and the UK with extensive experience into the management of injuries to the head, face and neck (HFN) from high energy bullets and explosive weaponry. The challenge is now to maintain the expertise in managing such injuries for future military deployments.MethodsThe manner in which each country approaches four parameters required for a surgeon to competently treat HFN wounds in deployed military environments was compared. These comprised initial surgical training (residency/registrar training), surgical fellowships, hospital type and appointment as an attending (USA) or consultant (UK) and predeployment training.ResultsNeither country has residents/registrars undertaking surgical training that is military specific. The Major Trauma and Reconstructive Fellowship based in Birmingham UK and the Craniomaxillofacial Trauma fellowship at Duke University USA provide additional training directly applicable to managing HFN trauma on deployment. Placement in level 1 trauma/major trauma centres is encouraged by both countries but is not mandatory. US surgeons attend one of three single-service predeployment courses, of which HFN skills are taught on both cadavers and in a 1-week clinical placement in a level 1 trauma centre. UK surgeons attend the Military Operational Surgical Training programme, a 1-week course that includes 1 day dedicated to teaching HFN injury management on cadavers.ConclusionsMultiple specialties of surgeon seen in the civilian environment are unlikely to be present, necessitating development of extended competencies. Military-tailored fellowships are capable of generating most of these skills early in a career. Regular training courses including simulation are required to maintain such skills and should not be given only immediately prior to deployment. Strong evidence exists that military consultants and attendings should only work at level 1/major trauma centres.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e1184
Author(s):  
M. Hadjipavlou ◽  
E. Grouse ◽  
R. Gray ◽  
C. Brown ◽  
D. Sharma

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Drain ◽  
Jonathon I Ferguson ◽  
Sharon Wilkinson ◽  
Samer AM Nashef

There may be conflict between the requirements of surgical training and those of the clinical service if training has an impact on clinical outcomes. One area of potential impact is perioperative blood loss. We compared total and 12-hour blood loss after 2,079 consecutive cardiac operations performed over 2 years by trainees and consultants. One- and two-way analyses of variance with EuroSCORE and surgeon status as factors were carried out to evaluate the impact of surgeon status on blood loss. There was no difference in blood loss between consultants and trainees. We also compared the rates between consultants and trainees of patients returning to the operating room due to bleeding. This showed a significant difference, with trainees having a higher rate of investigation for bleeding. Cardiac surgical training can be achieved without an adverse effect on blood loss, but it may be associated with a higher rate of re-intervention for bleeding.


Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 1534-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Dunn ◽  
Ben Beck ◽  
Pam M. Simpson ◽  
Peter A. Cameron ◽  
Marcus Kennedy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
James Houston ◽  
Luke Ashby ◽  
Jonathan Ogidi ◽  
Daren F Lui ◽  
Alex J Trompeter

Open fractures incur significant morbidity and mortality, and as such have standardised guidelines for their management. Photography of open fractures is an essential component of documentation in the treatment of open fractures as per the British Orthopaedic Association Standards of Trauma and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Smartphones have made photography easily accessible to the clinician, but serious concerns exist regarding data security and the consent process around the use of sensitive clinical images. This project sought to overcome this issue by developing a Caldicott-compliant hospital imaging protocol that allows clinicians to use their smartphone to upload open fracture images into the patient's permanent record. Implementation of the protocol was audited and resulted in the increase of safe and secure open fracture photographic storage to inpatient medical records. This protocol would be transferrable to other hospital trusts and could be adopted across major trauma networks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document