scholarly journals Pro-Inflammatory Interleukin-1 Genotypes Potentiate the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Events Mediated by Oxidized Phospholipids and Lipoprotein(a)

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (17) ◽  
pp. 1724-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sotirios Tsimikas ◽  
Gordon W. Duff ◽  
Peter B. Berger ◽  
John Rogus ◽  
Kenneth Huttner ◽  
...  
Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 381-P
Author(s):  
ARTHUR MADER ◽  
MAXIMILIAN MAECHLER ◽  
BARBARA LARCHER ◽  
LUKAS SPRENGER ◽  
BEATRIX MUTSCHLECHNER ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pao-Hsien Chu

Background and aims: Elevated lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease especially in familial hypercholesterolemia. The association of elevated lipoprotein(a) within non-familial hypercholesterolemia or healthy population however, is not known. Therefore, we investigated the associations between elevated lipoprotein(a) and the risk of cardiovascular disease in a non-familial hypercholesterolemia clinically healthy young age cohort. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed medical records of 3,427 participants with lipoprotein(a) levels from a tertiary healthcare center in Taiwan. We further classified lipoprotein(a) level into four groups and analyzed cardiovascular events. Results: Our study population had a mean age 46 years old that were 78% male. Mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein level were 195 mg/dL and 118 mg/dL respectively. Overall, 12.9% of the participants had an elevated lipoprotein(a) level (>30 mg/dL), and 2.7% had a very high level (>70 mg/dL). Thirty-three events including 6 participants with stroke and 27 with coronary artery disease were identified. A lipoprotein(a) level >70 mg/dL was associated with a higher risk of coronary artery disease events in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Aging was associated with a higher lipoprotein(a) value in the male participants but not in the female participants. However, the severity of fatty liver was not positively associated with lipoprotein(a) value. Conclusions: Elevated lipoprotein(a) was associated with coronary events but not the severity of fatty liver disease in non-familial hypercholesterolemia clinically healthy population. Aging may be associated with a higher lipoprotein(a) level in males but not females.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felice Gragnano ◽  
Fabio Fimiani ◽  
Marco Di Maio ◽  
Arturo Cesaro ◽  
Giuseppe Limongelli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Karrthik ◽  
M Gad ◽  
N Bazarbashi ◽  
K Ahuja ◽  
Y Sammour ◽  
...  

Abstract Background High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels have been shown to increase Myocardial Infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality. However, studies evaluating the optimal preventive measures for that subset of cardiac patients are scarce. This study aims to study the outcomes of aspirin use versus no aspirin for the prevention of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction in patients with high Lp(a) levels. Purpose We sought to determine the effect of Aspirin in reducing the rate of MI and all-cause mortality among patients with high lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a) ≥50mg/dL] Methods Patients who attended the preventive cardiology clinic from 2005 to 2016 and included in the Preventive Cardiology Database were included in the current single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study that was conducted according to the guidelines of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement) checklist. The primary outcome was the incidence of myocardial infarction and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Patients were excluded in cases of I) Lp(a)a <50mg/dL, II) history of malignancy, or III) being on anticoagulation/ dual antiplatelet therapy. The median duration of follow-up was 92 months from time of Lp(a) measurement to the last follow-up. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation or median (IQR), and categorical variables were expressed as percentages (%). All statistical tests were two-sided. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed with 1:1 nearest match for Age, Gender, Race, Smoking status, BMI, Diabetes, Peripheral artery disease, Carotid artery disease, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, Heart failure, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, Stroke, family history of coronary artery disease, Lp (a), LDL, HDL, Triglycerides, glucose and total cholesterol. Results 1,805 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria out of 7,410 patients initially identified with recorded Lp(a) levels in the Preventive Cardiology Database. Of these, 376 patients were taking aspirin, and 1429 patients were not receiving aspirin. After propensity score matching for different baseline characteristics and comorbidities as mentioned above, 316 patients were matched in each group. Patients who were on Aspirin had a significantly lower rate of MI events compared to patients who were not on aspirin (6.96% vs 12.02%, P=0.03) and a lower rate, however statistically non-significant, of all-cause mortality (2.84% vs 4.11%, P=0.385). Conclusion The use of aspirin in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels significantly lowers the rate of myocardial infarction events. Larger randomized clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the use of aspirin for primary and secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with high Lp(a) levels.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Hikita ◽  
Yosuke Yamakami ◽  
Keisuke Kojima ◽  
Yuichiro Sagawa ◽  
Hirofumi Ohtani ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cardiovascular mortality in patients with lower limb artery disease is higher in critical limb ischemia (CLI) than in intermittent claudication (IC). We sought to evaluate differential characteristics of coronary artery disease severity and prognostic factors for cardiovascular events between CLI and IC patients. Methods: Coronary and lower limb angiography was performed on 242 patients (age 73±8 years, mean±sd, men 186) without cardiac symptoms and with symptoms of either CLI or IC. From the coronary angiogram of each study patient, Gensini Score as an index of coronary angiographic severity and an incidence of significant stenosis (AHA classification, ≥75% stenosis) in at least one of major coronary arteries were evaluated. High sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), eicosapentaenoic acid-arachidonic acid ratio (EPA/AA), and lipoprotein (a), as biomarkers for prognostic factors, were measured from blood samples at rest in the fasting state. Results: The study patients were divided into CLI-group (42 patients) and IC-group (200 patients). Coronary angiography showed that Gensini Score and an incidence of significant stenosis (AHA classification, ≥75% stenosis) in at least one of major coronary arteries were higher in the CLI-group than in the IC-group (39±32 vs 8±8, p<0.001, 59.5% vs 22.0%, p<0.001, respectively). Hs-TnT and lipoprotein (a) values were higher in the CLI-group than the IC-group (0.15±0.19 ng/ml vs 0.05±0.09, p<0.001, 45.9±23.3 mg/dl vs 26.2±27.7, p<0.001, respectively) and EPA/AA was lower in the CLI-group than in the IC-group (0.22±0.11 vs 0.38±0.29, p<0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Greater coronary artery disease severity, higher hs-TnT and lipoprotein (a), and lower EPA/AA were observed in the CLI patients, which may explain higher cardiovascular events in CLI patients than IC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document