Definitive risk factors for anastomotic leak in open elective colon resection

2007 ◽  
Vol 205 (3) ◽  
pp. S20
Author(s):  
Paul N. Suding ◽  
Erin Jensen ◽  
Murray A. Abramson ◽  
Kamal Itani ◽  
Samuel E. Wilson
2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 828-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa J. Harris ◽  
Neil Moudgill ◽  
Eric Hager ◽  
Hamid Abdollahi ◽  
Scott Goldstein

Mechanical bowel preparation before elective colon resection has recently been questioned in the literature. We report a prospective study evaluating the anastomotic leak rate in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery without preoperative mechanical bowel preparation. One hundred fifty-three patients undergoing elective colon resection from July 2006 to June 2008 were enrolled into this Institutional Review Board-approved study. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon at a single institution. No patients received mechanical bowel preparation. Of the 153 patients enrolled, 51.6 per cent had a colorectostomy, 32 per cent had an ileocolostomy, 10.4 per cent had a colocolostomy 5.2 per cent had an ileoanal anastomosis, and 0.6 per cent had an ileorectostomy performed. A total of eight patients (5.2%) developed an anastomotic leak. Of these patients, four required reoperation, three were managed with percutaneous drainage, and one was managed with antibiotics alone. Five of the eight patients who developed an anastomotic leak had significant preoperative comorbidities, including neoadjuvant radiation therapy, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, prior anastomotic leak, and tobacco use. Elective colon resection can be performed safely without preoperative mechanical bowel preparation. Vigilance for anastomotic leak must be maintained at all times, especially in patients with comorbidities that predispose to anastomotic leak.


2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Juárez-Parra ◽  
J. Carmona-Cantú ◽  
J.R. González-Cano ◽  
S. Arana-Garza ◽  
R.J. Treviño-Frutos

2015 ◽  
Vol 262 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Frasson ◽  
Blas Flor-Lorente ◽  
José Luis Ramos Rodríguez ◽  
Pablo Granero-Castro ◽  
David Hervás ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Vikash Katiar ◽  
R.K. Jauhari ◽  
Abhinav Sengar ◽  
Vibhu Jain

Background: Despite advancements in modern surgery and postoperative care, disruption of gastrointestinal anastomosis remains the most dreaded complication, even in experienced surgical hands. The cause of leakage is multifactorial consisting of a complete spectrum of pre, intra and postoperative factors. Search for an ideal gastrointestinal anastomosis still remains an unquenched thirst. Study Design: Prospective, hospital based, time bound observational study. Methods: After ethical clearance, 288 consenting adult patients who underwent gastrointestinal anastomosis were observed for risk factors, presentation and outcome of leakage and evaluated using appropriate statistical tools. Results: An overall gastrointestinal anastomotic leak rate of 15.28% with peak incidence at 41-50 years (19.51%) was seen. Peritonitis (p=0.0009, OR=2.9611), COPD (p=0.0181, OR=2.7306), low serum albumin concentration (p=0.0028, OR=3.1442), ASA status of ≥III (p=0.0001, OR=4.0281) and a perioperative blood transfusion requirement of ≥2 units (p=0.0028, OR=3.1442) were the most signicant risk factors associated with leakage. Obstruction (p=0.0160, OR=2.2310), malignancy (p=0.0149, OR=2.6961), steroid therapy (p=0.0176, OR=2.2741), chemoradiation (p=0.0400, OR=2.4889), diabetes (p=0.0427, OR=2.2689), undernutrition (p= 0.0308, OR= 2.1099), anaemia (p=0.0325, OR=2.0183) and sepsis (p=0.0187, OR=2.2702) also showed clear risk augmentation. Risk of leakage was increased with a surgical duration of >4 hours (p=0.0078, OR=2.5610), when anastomosis was done as an emergency procedure (p=0.0427, OR=2.6571) or by a surgeon with expertise of ≤5 years (p=0.0338, OR=2.7733). Neither the level, type, technique of anastomosis; nor the usage of surgical staplers had an impact on leakage. Preoperative bowel preparation and creation of a proximal stoma also had minimal effect on leakage rates; though, the infectious complications that follow were greatly reduced. The most common presentation of anastomotic leak was a suspicious drain output with a mean time of 7.59± 2(2.48) postoperative days; resulting in a prolongation of hospitalization by more than ten days (p<0.0001), along with an increased mortality rate (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Accurately predicting anastomotic leakage still requires more evidence-based information. Even with good risk stratication, many causative factors may not be amenable to immediate correction in the pre-operative period. In such cases, the patient must be considered as a candidate for an enterostomy to help tide the crisis over.


Author(s):  
Shahnam ASKARPOUR ◽  
Mehran PEYVASTEH ◽  
Hazhir JAVAHERIZADEH ◽  
Nasim ASKARI

Background: Anastomotic leak are reported among neonates who underwent esophageal atresia. Aim: To find risk factors of anastomotic leakage in patients underwent esophageal repair. Methods: All cases with esophageal atresia were included. In this case control study, patients were classified in two groups according to presence or absence of anastomotic leaks. Duration of study was 10 years. Results: Sixty-one cases were included. Mean±SD age at time of surgery in patients with leakage and without leakage was 9.50±7.25 and 8.83±6.93 respectively (p=.670). Blood transfusion and two layer anastomosis had significant correlation with anastomotic leakage. Conclusion: Blood transfusion and double layer anastomosis are associated with higher rate of anastomotic leakage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Brinkmann ◽  
D H Chang ◽  
K Kuhr ◽  
A H Hoelscher ◽  
J Spiro ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric tube formation is the surgical treatment of choice for esophageal cancer. The surgical reconstruction induces changes of gastric microcirculation, which are recognized as potential risk factors of anastomotic leak. This prospective observational study investigates the association of celiac trunk (TC) stenosis with postoperative anastomotic leak. One hundred fifty-four consecutive patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy were included. Preoperative staging computed tomography (CT) was used to identify TC stenosis. Any narrowing of the lumen due to atherosclerotic changes was classified as stenosis. Percentage of stenotic changes was calculated using the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial formula. Multivariable analysis was used to identify possible risk factors for leak. The overall incidence of TC stenosis was 40.9%. Anastomotic leak was identified in 15 patients (9.7%). Incidence of anastomotic leak in patients with stenosis was 19.4% compared to 2.3% in patients without stenosis. Incidence of stenosis in patients with leak was 86.7% (13 of 15 patients) and significantly higher than 38.8% (54 of 139 patients) in patients without leak (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in median degree of TC stenosis (50.0% vs 39.4%; P = 0.032) in patients with and without leak. In the multivariable model, TC stenosis was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leak (odds ratio: 5.98, 95% CI: 1.58–22.61). TC stenosis is associated with postoperative anastomotic leak after Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy. Routine assessment of TC for possible stenosis is recommended to identify patients at risk.


2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 1083-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Moriello ◽  
Nancy E. Mayo ◽  
Liane Feldman ◽  
Franco Carli

1980 ◽  
Vol 192 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. BARRY BOYD ◽  
BERT BRADFORD ◽  
ALVIN L. WATNE

Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 161 (6) ◽  
pp. 1619-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahagn C. Nikolian ◽  
Neil S. Kamdar ◽  
Scott E. Regenbogen ◽  
Arden M. Morris ◽  
John C. Byrn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document